Background The mammalian Notch family ligands delta‐like 3 (DLL3) is reported to be a potential therapeutic target for large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC). The effect of DLL3 expression on LCNEC prognosis has not yet been elucidated. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 70 LCNEC patients undergoing surgical resection between 2001 and 2015 using a prospectively maintained database. We performed immunohistochemistry for DLL3 and investigated the correlation between the sensitivity of LCNEC to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy. Results DLL3 expression was positive in 26 (37.1%) LCNEC patients. A total of 23 patients (32.9%) received platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with DLL3 expression‐positive tumors, no difference was found in the five‐year overall survival (OS) or recurrence‐free survival (RFS) between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy (surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery alone, five‐year OS: 58.3% vs. 35.7% P = 0.36, five‐year RFS: 41.7% vs. 35.7% P = 0.74). In contrast, among patients with DLL3‐negative tumors, significantly greater five‐year OS and RFS rates were observed for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy than for those without it (surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery alone: five‐year OS: 90.0% vs. 26.9% P<0.01, five‐year RFS: 80.0% vs. 21.7% P < 0.01). A multivariate analysis for the RFS revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was a significant independent prognostic factor among patients with DLL3‐negative tumors (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–0.41, P < 0.01), although it was not a factor among patients with DLL3‐positive tumors (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.23–2.27, P = 0.58). Conclusions Our results revealed that DLL3 is a predictive marker of sensitivity to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy for LCNEC. Key points Significant findings of the study DLL3 was a predictive marker of sensitivity to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy for LCNEC. Among patients with DLL3 expression‐negative LCNEC, platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the OS and RFS, although it did not do so among patients with DLL3 expression‐positive LCNEC. What this study adds Our results suggest that DLL3 expression‐positive LCNEC may be better treated with other types of adjuvant chemotherapy, such as the anti‐DLL3 therapies if these effects are confirmed by ongoing clinical research.
OBJECTIVES Despite significant advances in surgical techniques, including thoracoscopic approaches and perioperative care, the morbidity rate remains high after lung resection. This study focused on a low attenuation cluster analysis, which represented the size distribution of pulmonary emphysema and assessed its utility for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy. METHODS From April 2013 to September 2018, lung cancer patients who received spirometry and computed tomography (CT) before surgery and underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy were included. The cumulative size distribution of the low attenuation area (LAA, defined as ≤−950 Hounsfield unit on CT) clusters followed a power-law characterized by an exponent D-value, a measure of the complexity of the alveolar structure. D-value and LAA% (LAA/total lung volume) were calculated using preoperative 3-dimensional CT software. The relationship between pulmonary complications and patient characteristics, including D-value and LAA%, was investigated. RESULTS Among 471 patients, there were 61 respiratory complication cases (12.9%). Receiver operation characteristic curve analysis revealed that the best predictive cut-off value of D-value and LAA% for pulmonary complications was 2.27 and 16.5, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.72 and 0.58, respectively. D-value was significantly correlated with % forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Per univariate analysis, gender, smoking history, forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity, LAA% and D-value were risk factors for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications. In the multivariate analysis, D-value remained a significant predictive factor. CONCLUSION Preoperative assessment of emphysema cluster analysis may represent the vulnerability of the operated lung and could be the novel predictor for pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy.
OBJECTIVES Segmentectomies such as S1 + 2, S1 + 2+3 and S4 + 5 segmentectomy are used to treat patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the left upper lobe. However, the preservable lung volume and changes after such segmentectomies remain unknown. We compared the residual pulmonary function after thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy in the left upper lobe and examined the efficacy of S1 + 2 segmentectomy regarding postoperative pulmonary function. METHODS Patients with left upper lobe NSCLC who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy were included. Spirometry and computed tomography were performed before and 6 months after resection, and the ipsilateral preserved lobe volume was calculated using 3-dimensional computer tomography. The percentage of postoperative/preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s and actual/predicted regional forced expiratory volume in 1 s (preservation rate) in the residual lobe were compared. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients underwent lobectomy and 70 patients underwent segmentectomy (23 S1 + 2, 35 S1 + 2+3 and 12 S4 + 5 segmentectomies). The percentage of postoperative/preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 97 in S1 + 2, 82 in S1 + 2+3, 86 in S4 + 5 segmentectomy and 73 in left upper lobectomy, indicating that segmentectomy could be a meaningful approach to preserve pulmonary function. The preservation rate was 83% in S1 + 2 and 62% in S1 + 2+3 segmentectomy and was significantly higher in S1 + 2 than in S1 + 2+3 segmentectomy (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative pulmonary function and the preservable lung volume of the residual lobe after thoracoscopic S1 + 2 segmentectomy were well-preserved among other segmentectomies and lobectomy. Thoracoscopic S1 + 2 segmentectomy is a good alternative for preserving postoperative function.
OBJECTIVES We investigated the influence of the preoperative haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value on the prognosis and pathology of patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 400 lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection between 2009 and 2013 using a prospectively maintained database. We stratified 400 patients into 4 groups according to the preoperative HbA1c value as follows: HbA1c ≤ 5.9 (n = 296), 6.0 ≤ HbA1c ≤ 6.9 (n = 70), 7.0 ≤ HbA1c ≤ 7.9 (n = 21) and HbA1c ≥ 8.0 (n = 12). We compared the recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) among these 4 groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 61.2 months. On comparing the recurrence-free survival and OS rates among these 4 groups, we found that these rates among patients in the HbA1c ≥ 8.0 group were significantly poorer compared with the other 3 groups (5-year recurrence-free survival: HbA1c ≤ 5.9, 70.4%; 6.0 ≤ HbA1c ≤ 6.9, 69.7%; 7.0 ≤ HbA1c ≤ 7.9, 70.7%; ≥8.0 HbA1c, 18.8%; P = 0.002; and 5-year OS: HbA1c ≤ 5.9, 88.7%; 6.0 ≤ HbA1c ≤ 6.9, 80.6%; 7.0 ≤ HbA1c ≤ 7.9, 90.2%; ≥8.0 HbA1c, 66.7%; P = 0.046). Patients in the HbA1c ≥ 8.0 group had significantly more tumours with vascular invasion (P = 0.041) and experienced distant metastasis significantly more often (P = 0.028) than those with other values. A multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative HbA1c ≥ 8.0 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.33; P = 0.026] and lymph node metastasis (HR 3.94; P < 0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Our results revealed that preoperative HbA1c ≥ 8.0 is associated to poor prognosis due to the occurrence of distant metastasis and we should carefully follow these patients after surgery. Clinical registration number Hyogo Cancer Center, G-57.
Background The clinical and prognostic implications of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status in resected lung cancers remain unclear. In this study we analyzed the prognostic and predictive significance of ALK‐positive among patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 197 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete surgical resection and had been tested for their ALK status. We investigated the impact of an ALK‐positive status on the recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and examined the predictive factors for an ALK‐positive status. Results ALK positivity was noted in 36 (18%) out of 197 patients, and when limited to stage I patients, in 24 (19%) out of 124. In the pathological‐stage I population, while the OS exhibited no significant difference between ALK‐positive and ALK‐negative patients (5‐year OS rate, 81.2% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.226), the RFS of ALK‐positive patients was significantly worse than that of ALK‐negative patients (5‐year RFS rate, 55.9% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.018). A multivariate analysis showed that ALK‐positive status (hazard ratio [HR] 3.431, p = 0.009) was an independent prognostic factor for the RFS. Regarding the relationship between clinicopathological factors and an ALK‐positive status, a high‐grade histological subtype, including solid and micropapillary subtypes (odds ratio [OR] 5.464, p < 0.001), and never‐smokers (OR 4.292, p = 0.018) were associated with ALK‐positive. Conclusion A high‐grade histological subtype and never‐smokers were associated with ALK positivity, and the RFS of ALK‐positive patients was worse than that of ALK‐negative patients among patients with completely resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.