A real-time version of the Nodal Expansion Method (NEM) code is developed and implemented into Kozloduy 6 full-scope replica control room simulator. Combined with an enhanced thermal-hydraulics and I&C models the whole package is a high-fidelity simulation tool for operator training and various other applications. The fidelity and accuracy of simulation with emphasis on reactor core model is illustrated through comparison with plant-specific data. The transient of ‘Switching-off of One of the Four Operating Main Circulation Pumps at Nominal Reactor Power’ as described in OECD/NEA Kalinin 3 Coolant Transient Benchmark is an example of an asymmetric core scenario with a range of parameter changes. Simulation results concerning fuel assembly power and axial power distribution during the transient are compared with records from Kalinin 3 in-core monitoring system. Main operating parameters of nuclear steam supply system of a VVER-1000/V320 series units vary to a considerable degree. While Kalinin 3 benchmark specification contains very good description of the transient, as well as record of many parameters of the unit, the document provides only superfluous description of the reference unit. In such a case, an approach based on a ‘generic’ V320 model by default introduces deviations which are difficult to quantify. There are several examples which warrant discussion. One example is core coolant flow and pressure loss during the transient. Pump head and pressure loss across reactor vessel are measured and recorded and in-core monitoring system provides estimation of core coolant flow, which is quite high in comparison with some other V320 units (e.g. by about 5 % larger). Without more detailed pressure loss data across the main circulation loop and specific pump characteristics, however, one can only guess how much simulation is off the mark. Another detail of the same problem is coolant flow through a specific fuel assembly. The presence of a fuel assembly of different design (TVS-M type) surrounded by TVSA type fuel assemblies shall be thoroughly considered, because secondary sources indicate significant differences in fuel assembly pressure loss coefficients between the two types. Coolant flow affects coolant (and fuel) temperature profile and thus neutron cross-sections. Yet another example, even more strongly affecting our ability to interpret simulation results is core power reconstruction provided by the in-core monitoring system of the unit. The SPND (Self-Powered Neutron Detector) current readings are subject of conversion by an algorithm based upon simulated spatial neutron flux distribution across the reactor core. While error estimation of the parameters in stationary conditions is available from secondary sources, there is no reliable estimation of error magnitude during the transient.
The aim of this paper is to summarize authors' experience in adaptation of an existing plant-specific VVER-1000/V320 model for simulation of a rare example of a Kalinin 3 nuclear power plant (NPP) transient of “switching-off of one of the four operating main circulation pumps at nominal reactor power” with an asymmetric core configuration. The fidelity and accuracy of simulation with emphasis on reactor core model is illustrated through comparison with plant-specific data. Simulation results concerning fuel assembly (FA) power and axial power distribution during the transient are compared with records from Kalinin 3 in-core monitoring system (ICMS). Main operating parameters of nuclear steam supply system of a VVER-1000/V320 series units vary to a considerable degree. While Kalinin 3 benchmark specification contains very good description of the transient, as well as record of many parameters of the unit, the document provides only superficial description of the reference unit. In such a case, an approach based on a “generic” V320 model by default introduces deviations which are difficult to quantify. There are several examples which warrant discussion. Some of the most important lessons learned are as follows. (1) individual characteristics of all the main circulation pumps and the reactor coolant loops are quite important for the quality of simulation and should be accounted for in the model; (2) variations in fuel assembly characteristics should be accounted for not only in terms of macroscopic cross section library but also in terms of local pressure loss coefficients and mixing factors in the case of mixed core loads; (3) comprehensive plant-specific model of dynamic response of instrumentation and control (I&C) systems is a necessity; dynamic characteristics of individual measurement channels (nuclear instrumentation, pressure, temperature) should be accounted for; and (4) comprehensive plant-specific model of balance-of-plant equipment, instrumentation, and control is a necessity. Above requirements impose a difficult task to comply with. Nevertheless, any individual nuclear power unit is supposed to maintain a detailed design database and data requirements for plant-specific model development should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.