No abstract

Objective. The application of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in the treatment of paralytic strabismus has been recognized, but there are few studies on the treatment of acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE). This study was aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of AACE and compare the therapeutic effects of BTXA and traditional surgery. Methods. 78 patients with AACE in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between March 2019 and March 2021 were reviewed. The relevant medical records of the patients were collected, and they were divided into surgical group ( n = 46 ) and botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) group ( n = 32 ) according to different treatment approaches. The surgical group was treated with squint correction, whereas the BTXA group was treated with microinjection of BTXA in MR. Eye alignment, esotropia, stereopsis, and complications were examined before and after treatment in both groups. Results. The refractive status of 78 patients with AACE was mostly myopic refractive error. In general, the angle of esotropia at distance was larger than which at near, with a statistically significant difference. At follow-up assessments of 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment, the total effective rates of the surgical group and the BTXA group were 100% and 90.48%, respectively. The residual angle of esotropia of both groups was lower after treatment. Additionally, the incidence rate of complications in the BTXA group was significantly lower than that in the surgical group. Conclusion. AACE occurs mostly in people with myopic refractive errors and is associated with prolonged near work. Besides surgical treatment, micro-injection of BTXA is also an effective and safe treatment for AACE.

Objective Our aim is to establish a machine-learning model that will enable us to investigate the key factors influencing the prevalence of myopia in students. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study that included 16,653 students from grades 1–3 across 17 cities in Hubei Province. We used questionnaires to discern levels of participation in potential factors contributing to the development of myopia. The relative importance of potential contributors was ranked using machine-learning methods. The students’ visual acuity (VA) was measured and those with logMAR VA of > 0.0 underwent a autorefraction test to determine students’ refraction status. Results The prevalence of myopia in grades 1, 2, and 3 was 14.70%, 20.54% and 28.93%, respectively. Myopia rates among primary school students in provincial capital city (32.35%) were higher than those in other urban (23.03%) and rural (14.82%) areas. Children with non-myopic parents, only one myopic parent, or both parents having myopia exhibited myopic rates of 16.36%, 25.18%, and 41.37%, respectively. Myopia prevalence was higher in the students who continued to use their eyes at close range for a long time and lower in those engaged longer in outdoor activities. The machine-learning model determined that the top three contributing factors were the students’ age (0.36), followed by place of residence (0.34), starting age of education (0.21). Conclusion The overall prevalence of myopia was 21.52%. Children’s age and place of residence were the important influencing factors, but genetics and environmental were also played key roles in myopia development.