Background: The incidence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is increasing worldwide, contributing to 70–85% of kidney cancer cases. Ferroptosis is a novel type of programmed cell death and could predict prognoses in cancers. Here, we developed a ferroptosis-related long non-coding RNA (FRlncRNA) signature to improve the prognostic prediction of ccRCC.Methods: The transcriptome profiles of FRlncRNAs and clinical data of ccRCC were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and ICGC databases. Patients were randomly assigned to training cohorts, testing cohorts, and overall cohorts. The FRlncRNA signature was constructed by Lasso regression and Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan–Meier (K-M) analysis was used to access the prognosis of each group. The accuracy of this signature was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The visualization of functional enrichment was carried out by the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Internal and external datasets were performed to verify the FRlncRNA signature.Results: A FRlncRNA signature comprising eight lncRNAs (AL590094.1, LINC00460, LINC00944, AC024060.1, HOXB-AS4, LINC01615, EPB41L4A-DT, and LINC01550) was identified. Patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups according to the median risk score, in which the high-risk group owned a dramatical shorter survival time than that of the low-risk group. Through ROC analysis, it was found that this signature had a greater predictive capability than traditional evaluation methods. The risk score was an independent risk factor for overall survival suggested by multivariate Cox analysis (HR = 1.065, 95%CI = 1.036–1.095, and p < 0.001). We constructed a clinically predictive nomogram based on this signature and its clinical features, which is of accurate prediction about the survival rate of patients. The GSEA showed that primary pathways were the P53 signaling pathway and tumor necrosis factor–mediated signaling pathway. The major FRlncRNAs (LINC00460, LINC00944, LINC01550, and EPB41L4A-DT) were verified with the prognosis of ccRCC in the GEPIA and K-M Plotter databases. Their major target genes (BNIP3, RRM2, and GOT1) were closely related to the stage, grade, and survival outcomes of ccRCC by the validation of multiple databases. Additionally, we found two groups had a significant distinct pattern of immune function, immune checkpoint, and immune infiltration, which may lead to different survival benefits.Conclusions: The FRlncRNA signature was accurate and act as reliable tools for predicting clinical outcomes and the immune microenvironment of patients with ccRCC, which may be molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Purpose. This study aimed to establish a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with bladder cancer (BC) by ferroptosis-related long noncoding RNAs (FRlncRNAs) signature. Methods. We obtained FRlncRNAs expression profiles and clinical data of patients with BC from the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The patients were divided into the training set, testing set, and overall set. Lasso regression and multivariate Cox regression were used to establish the FRlncRNAs signature, the prognosis of each group was compared by Kaplan–Meier (K-M) analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluated the accuracy of the model. The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used for the visualization of the functional enrichment for FRlncRNAs. The databases of GEPIA and K-M Plotter were used for subsequent functional analysis of major FRlncRNAs. Results. Thirteen prognostic FRlncRNAs (LINC00942, MAFG-DT, AL049840.3, AL136084.3, OCIAD1-AS1, AC062017.1, AC008074.2, AC018653.3, AL031775.1, USP30-AS1, LINC01767, AC132807.2, and AL354919.2) were identified to be significantly different, constituting an FRlncRNAs signature. Patients with BC were divided into low-risk group and high-risk group by this signature in the training, testing, and overall sets. K-M analysis showed that the prognosis of patients in the high-risk group was poor and the difference in the subgroup analyses was statistically significant. ROC analysis revealed that the predictive ability of the model was more accurate than traditional assessment methods. A risk score based on FRlncRNAs signature was an independent prognostic factor for the patients with BC (HR = 1.388, 95%CI = 1.228–1.568, P < 0.001 ). Combining the FRlncRNAs signature and clinicopathological factors, a predictive nomogram was constructed. The nomogram can accurately predict the overall survival of patients and had high clinical practicability. The GSEA analysis showed that the primary pathways were WNT, MAPK, and cell-matrix adhesion signaling pathways. The major FRlncRNAs (MAFG-DT) were associated with poor prognosis in the GEPIA and K-M Plotter database. Conclusion. Thirteen prognostic FRlncRNAs and their nomogram were accurate tools for predicting the OS of BC, which might be molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

The meta-analysis was performed to access efficacy of L-carnitine/L-acetyl-carnitine (LC/LAC) and N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) in men with idiopathic asthenozoospermia. We researched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and references to related articles. Finally, seven articles including 621 patients were analyzed. The results indicated that LC/LAC and NAC had a considerable improvement in sperm motility ( p = .03 and p < .0001, respectively) and normal morphology ( p = .006, p = .0002, respectively) compared with the placebo group. Besides, NAC had a significantly greater increase in sperm concentration ( p < .00001) and ejaculate volume ( p = .002) compared with the placebo group, and there was no significant difference in LC/LAC. For the analysis of serum hormones, NAC had no obvious differences in improving the serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and prolactin compared with non-treatment group. Conclusively, LC/LAC and NAC showed a greater improvement in sperm motility and normal morphology. Moreover, NAC has a positive effect on sperm concentration and ejaculate volume, whereas no obvious effect was observed in serum hormones.