No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionTo investigate the clinical, radiographic and pathological features of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis (anti-MDA5+DM).MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the medical records of patients with anti-MDA5+DM who had undergone radiological examination, and lung histopathology was performed on 17 of them.ResultsThis study examined 329 patients with anti-MDA5+DM, of whom 308 (93.6%) were diagnosed with ILD and 177 (53.8%) exhibited rapidly progressive ILD (RPILD). The most common radiographic patterns were organising pneumonia (OP) (43.2%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (26.4%) and NSIP+OP (18.5%). Histological analysis showed NSIP (41.2%) and NSIP+OP (47.1%) to be the predominant patterns. However, in the 17 patients who underwent lung histopathology, the coincidence rate between radiological and histopathological diagnoses was only 11.8%. Compared with patients without RPILD, those with RPILD showed a higher prevalence of NSIP+OP (26.6% vs 10.7%, p=0.001) and a lower prevalence of NSIP pattern (21.5% vs 37.4%, p=0.002) on high-resolution CT. Furthermore, patients with radiographic patterns of NSIP+OP or diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) had more risk factors for poor prognosis, with 12-month mortality rates of 45.9% and 100%, respectively.ConclusionsRPILD was commonly observed in patients with anti-MDA5+DM. OP was identified as the predominant radiographic pattern, which corresponded to a histopathological pattern of NSIP or NSIP+OP. Notably, patients exhibiting radiographic patterns of NSIP+OP or DAD were shown to have a poor prognosis.

ObjectiveTo explore the clinical features and prognoses of dermatomyositis (DM) associated with a double-positive anti-MDA5 and anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-ARS) antibody presentation.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1280 consecutive patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Individuals with anti-MDA5 and anti-ARS antibodies (anti-MDA5+/ARS+) were compared to anti-MDA5-/ARS+ and anti-MDA5+/ARS- control individuals based on clinical, pulmonary radiological characteristics, treatment, and follow-up information.ResultsSix individuals (0.47%) presented with anti-MDA5+/ARS+; of these, 2 (33.3%) were anti-PL-12+, 2 (33.3%) were anti-Jo-1+, 1 (16.7%) was anti-EJ+, and 1 (16.7%) was anti-PL-7+. Hallmark cutaneous manifestations, including Gottron’s sign (100%), heliotrope rash (50%), mechanic’s hand (66.7%), and skin ulcers (16.7%) were common. Anti-MDA5+/ARS+ patients tended to have higher ferritin levels (p = 0.038) than anti-MDA5-/ARS+ group, and higher CD4+ T-cell counts (p = 0.032) compared to the anti-MDA5+/ARS- group. Radiologically, NSIP with OP overlap was predominant (60%). Consolidation (60%), ground-glass attenuation (GGA) (80%), traction bronchiectasis (80%), and intralobular reticulation (100%) were common in anti-MDA5+/ARS+ individuals. All were diagnosed with ILD and 50% were categorized as RPILD. All patients received glucocorticoids combined with one or more immunosuppressants. Most (83.3%) had a good prognosis following treatment, but there was no difference in the survival rate between the three subgroups.ConclusionPresentation with anti-MDA5+/ARS+ DM was rare. The clinical and radiological characteristics of anti-MDA5+/ARS+ DM combined the features of anti-MDA5+ and anti-ARS+ individuals. Individuals with anti-MDA5+/ARS+ antibodies may respond well to glucocorticoid therapy; glucocorticoids combined with one or more immunosuppressants may be considered a basic treatment approach.