Gene mutations have not yet been included in the 2016 WHO classification and revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), which are now widely utilized to discriminate myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients regarding risk of leukemia evolution and overall survival (OS). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether integration of gene mutations with other risk factors could further improve the stratification of MDS patients. Mutational analyses of 25 genes relevant to myeloid malignancies in 426 primary MDS patients showed that mutations of CBL, IDH2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, and TP53 were independently associated with shorter survival. Patients within each IPSS-R or 2016 WHO classification-defined risk group could be stratified into two risk subgroups based on the mutational status of these five genes; patients with these poor-risk mutations had an OS shorter than others in the same risk group, but similar to those with the next higher risk category. A scoring system incorporating age, IPSS-R and five poor-risk mutations could divide the MDS patients into four risk groups (P < 0.001 for both OS and leukemia-free survival). In conclusion, integration of gene mutations in current IPSS-R improves the prognostication of MDS patients and may help identify high-risk patients for more aggressive treatment in IPSS-R lower risk group.

Mutations of the GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2) gene in myeloid malignancies usually cluster in the zinc finger 1 (ZF1) and the ZF2 domains. Mutations in different locations of GATA2 may have distinct impact on clinico-biological features and outcomes in AML patients, but little is known in this aspect. In this study, we explored GATA2 mutations in 693 de novo non-M3 AML patients and identified 44 GATA2 mutations in 43 (6.2%) patients, including 31 in ZF1, 10 in ZF2, and three outside the two domains. Different from GATA2 ZF2 mutations, ZF1 mutations were closely associated with French-American-British (FAB) M1 subtype, CEBPA double mutations (CEBPAdouble-mut), but inversely correlated with FAB M4 subtype, NPM1 mutations, and FLT3-ITD. ZF1-mutated AML patients had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) than GATA2-wild patients and ZF2-mutated patients in total cohort as well as in those with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and normal karyotype. ZF1 mutations also predicted better disease-free survival and a trend of better OS in CEBPAdouble-mut patients. Sequential analysis showed GATA2 mutations could be acquired at relapse. In conclusion, GATA2 ZF1 mutations are associated with distinct clinico-biological features and predict better prognosis, different from ZF2 mutations, in AML patients.

No abstract

Summary Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) by reverse seroconversion (HBV‐RS) after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) can occur in patients with resolved HBV infection (rHBV, defined as negative HBV surface antigen [HBsAg] and positive HBV core antibody), and may cause fatal hepatitis. To explore the risk factors, we retrospectively identified 817 consecutive patients who underwent allo‐HSCT from 2005 to 2016 in this largest single centre cohort from National Taiwan Univerisity Hospital. Transplants using donors or recipients positive for HBsAg or HBV DNA were excluded, leaving 445 rHBV patients for analysis. The 3‐ and 5‐year cumulative incidence of HBV‐RS after allo‐HSCT was 8·7% and 10·5%, respectively, at a median 16 months after allo‐HSCT. All had concurrent HBV reactivation. HBV flares developed in 19% of HBV‐RS cases, but none experienced hepatic failure. Neither did it impact non‐relapse mortality or overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with donor lacking hepatitis B surface antibody and extensive chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (cGVHD) have the highest risk for HBV‐RS, with 5‐year incidence of 24·2%. In conclusion, adoptive immunity transfer from the donor seems to have protective effects against HBV‐RS, which may alter future donor selection algorithms, and combined with extensive cGVHD provides a good target for risk‐adaptive HBV prophylaxis.

Background Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is the ultimate cure for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Aim This study was performed to compare the outcomes of ALL patients receiving busulfan (Bu) with cyclophosphamide (Cy)‐based or total body irradiation (TBI)‐based regimen in a Chinese population. Methods We enrolled 224 adult patients with ALL who received allo‐HSCT at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1997 and 2016. Results The median age at transplantation was 33 years. Before allo‐HSCT, 75.9% of patients attained first or late complete remission. A total of 141 patients (62.9%) received Bu/Cy‐based conditioning, either myeloablative (MA) or reduced‐intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST), and 83 patients received a TBI‐based regimen (MA‐TBI). Patients receiving the MA‐Bu regimen had longer relapse‐free survival (RFS) than those receiving the MA‐TBI regimen (median, 24.1 vs. 6.7 months, p = .044). There was no difference in overall survival (OS, MA‐Bu vs. MA‐TBI vs. RIST‐Bu: 39.4 vs. 28.2 vs. 13.1 months, p = .276), treatment‐related mortality (TRM), or incidences of grade 3–4 acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). Among patients receiving identical GvHD prophylactic regimens, there was no difference between MA‐Bu and MA‐TBI groups regarding the incidence of grade 3–4 acute GvHD, grade 2–4, and all‐grade chronic GvHD. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving oral busulfan had comparable RFS and OS to the intravenous busulfan group ( p = .436 and p = .236, respectively), but a higher TRM (25% vs. 9.8%, p = .016). In the multivariable analysis, disease status before allo‐HSCT was the only risk factor impacting RFS and OS. Conclusion In summary, patients receiving Bu/Cy‐based or TBI‐based regimens as conditioning had similar results in terms of OS, TRM, and acute GvHD, whereas the use of myeloablative Bu/Cy resulted in a better RFS. A Bu‐based regimen could be an alternative conditioning choice for patients who are ineligible to receive TBI. Prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the long‐term outcomes.