Scarring of the kidney is a major public health concern, directly promoting loss of kidney function. In order to understand the role of microRNA (miRNA) in the progression of kidney scarring in response to injury, we investigated changes in miRNA expression in two kidney fibrosis models, and identified 24 commonly upregulated miRNAs. Among them, miR-21 was highly elevated in both animal models and human transplant kidney nephropathy. Deletion of miR-21 in mice resulted in no overt abnormality. However, miR-21-/- mice suffered far less interstitial fibrosis in response to kidney injury, which was pheno-copied in wild-type mice treated with anti-miR-21 oligonucleotides. Surprisingly, global de-repression of miR-21 target messenger RNAs was only readily detectable in miR-21-/- kidneys after injury. Analysis of gene expression profiles identified groups of genes involved in metabolic pathways that were up-regulated in the absence of miR-21, including the lipid metabolism pathway regulated by Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α (Pparα), a direct miR-21 target. Over-expression of Pparα prevented UUO-induced injury and fibrosis. Pparα deficiency abrogated the anti-fibrotic effect of anti-miR21 oligonucleotides. miR-21 also regulates the redox metabolic pathway. The mitochondrial inhibitor of reactive oxygen species generation, Mpv17l, was repressed by miR-21, correlating closely with enhanced oxidative kidney damage. These studies demonstrate that miR-21 contributes to fibrogenesis and epithelial injury in the kidney in two mouse models and is a candidate target for anti-fibrotic therapies.
Genomic ablation of hepatocyte-specific fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)4 in mice revealed a role of FGF signaling in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism and hepatolobular restoration in response to injury without effect on liver development or hepatocyte proliferation. Although the potential role of all 23 FGF polypeptides in the liver is still unclear, the most widely studied prototypes, FGF1 and FGF2, are present and have been implicated in liver cell growth and function in vitro. To determine whether FGF1 and FGF2 play a role in response to injury and fibrosis, we examined the impact of both acute and chronic exposure to carbon tetrachloride (CCl 4 ) in the livers of FGF1-and FGF2-deficient mice. After acute CCl 4 exposure, FGF1(؊/؊)FGF2(؊/؊) mice exhibited an accelerated release of serum alanine aminotransferase similar to FGFR4 deficiency, but no effect on overall hepatolobular restoration or bile acid metabolism. The fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) comprise a family of 23 reported members that have varying affinities for variants of four different FGF receptor kinases (FGFR1 to FGFR4). 1-3 FGF1 and FGF2, the first two cloned members of the FGF family, 4,5 have received the most study, are widely expressed, and thus, predicted to be involved in tissue-specific functions and associated pathologies at their site of expression. 6,7 In vitro FGF1 affects cells of multiple origin whereas activity of FGF2 appears more limited to cells derived from mesenchyme and neuroectoderm. 8 FGF1 and FGF2 have been implicated in derivation of the liver from foregut endoderm. 9 However, mice lacking FGF1, FGF2, or both FGF1 and FGF2 are viable, fertile, and grossly indistinguishable from wild type (WT) except for modest defects in cardiovascular tissue, healing of skin wounds, and neuronal tissue. 3,10,11 This suggests that FGF1 and FGF2 alone are not essential for embryonic development or are compensated by other members of the extensive FGF ligand family. Consequently, FGF1-and FGF2-deficient animals are available for study of the role of the two factors in adult tissue homeostasis. Despite their ubiquity, little has emerged except for the modest effects of ablation of FGF1 and FGF2 in the cardiovascular, skin, and nervous systems.Although the levels of mRNA transcripts are low, longlived FGF1 and FGF2 polypeptides are present in the resting liver at significant levels. 12 This suggests that a significant reservoir of both ligands is present in the resting liver in an inactive state before activation and
OBJECTIVE-Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family signaling largely controls cellular homeostasis through short-range intercell paracrine communication. Recently FGF15/19, 21, and 23 have been implicated in endocrine control of metabolic homeostasis. The identity and location of the FGF receptor isotypes that mediate these effects are unclear. The objective was to determine the role of FGFR4, an isotype that has been proposed to mediate an ileal FGF15/19 to hepatocyte FGFR4 axis in cholesterol homeostasis, in metabolic homeostasis in vivo. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-FGFR4Ϫ/Ϫ micemice overexpressing constitutively active hepatic FGFR4 -and FGFR4 Ϫ/Ϫ with constitutively active hepatic FGFR4 restored in the liver were subjected to a normal and a chronic high-fat diet sufficient to result in obesity. Systemic and liver-specific metabolic phenotypes were then characterized. RESULTS-FGFR4-deficient mice on a normal diet exhibited features of metabolic syndrome that include increased mass of white adipose tissue, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance, in addition to hypercholesterolemia. Surprisingly, the FGFR4 deficiency alleviated high-fat diet-induced fatty liver in obese mice, which is also a correlate of metabolic syndrome. Restoration of FGFR4, specifically in hepatocytes of FGFR4-deficient mice, decreased plasma lipid levels and restored the high-fat diet-induced fatty liver but failed to restore glucose tolerance and sensitivity to insulin. CONCLUSIONS-FGFR4plays essential roles in systemic lipid and glucose homeostasis. FGFR4 activity in hepatocytes that normally serves to prevent systemic hyperlipidemia paradoxically underlies the fatty liver disease associated with chronic high-fat intake and obesity. Diabetes
The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor complex is a regulator of adult organ homeostasis in addition to its central role in embryonic development and wound healing. FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4) is the sole FGFR receptor kinase that is significantly expressed in mature hepatocytes. Previously, we showed that mice lacking mouse FGFR4 (mR4 ؊/؊ ) exhibited elevated fecal bile acids, bile acid pool size, and expression of liver cholesterol 7␣-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), the rate-limiting enzyme for canonical neutral bile acid synthesis. To prove that hepatocyte FGFR4 was a negative regulator of cholesterol metabolism and bile acid synthesis independent of background, we generated transgenic mice overexpressing a constitutively active human FGFR4 (CahR4) in hepatocytes and crossed them with the FGFR4-deficient mice to generate CahR4/mR4 ؊/؊ mice. In mice expressing active FGFR4 in liver, fecal bile acid excretion was 64%, bile acid pool size was 47%, and Cyp7a1 expression was 10 -30% of wild-type mice. The repressed level of Cyp7a1 expression was resistant to induction by a high cholesterol diet relative to wild-type mice. Expression of CahR4 in mR4 ؊/؊ mouse livers depressed bile acid synthesis below wild-type levels from the elevated levels observed in mR4 ؊/؊ . Levels of phosphorylated cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which is part of a pathway implicated in bile acid-mediated repression of synthesis, was 30% of wild-type levels in mR4 ؊/؊ livers, whereas CahR4 livers exhibited an average 2-fold increase. However, cholate still strongly induced phospho-JNK in mR4 ؊/؊ livers. These results confirm that hepatocyte FGFR4 regulates bile acid synthesis by repression of Cyp7a1 expression. Hepatocyte FGFR4 may contribute to the repression of bile acid synthesis through JNK signaling but is not required for activation of JNK signaling by bile acids.
Inappropriate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling is involved in most tissue-specific pathologies including cancer. Previously we showed that inappropriate expression and chronic activity of FGF receptor (FGFR) 1 in hepatocytes accelerated diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-initiated hepatocarcinogenesis. Here we showed that although widely expressed FGF1 and FGF2 are frequently upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), germline deletion of both FGF1 and FGF2 had no effect on DEN-initiated hepatocarcinogenesis. Thus overexpression of FGF1 or FGF2 may be a consequence rather than contributor to hepatoma progression. FGF21 is the first of 22 homologues whose expression has been reported to be preferentially in the liver. We showed that similar to FGF1 and FGF2, FGF21 mRNA was upregulated in neoplastic and regenerating liver after partial hepatectomy (PH) and CCl4 administration. In situ hybridization analysis confirmed that in contrast to FGF1 and FGF2, expression of FGF21 mRNA was limited to hepatocytes. Forced overexpression of FGF21 in hepatocytes by gene targeting had no apparent impact on normal liver development and compensatory response to injury. Surprisingly, overexpression of FGF21 delayed the appearance of DEN-induced liver tumors. At 8 and 10 mo, only 10% and 30% of transgenic mice, respectively, developed adenomas compared to 50% (all adenomas) and 80% (60% adenoma/20% HCC) in the wild-type (WT) mice. However, the incidence and burden of HCC at 10 mo and later was equal in the FGF21 transgenic and WT mice. We propose that FGF21 may delay development of adenomas through activation of resident hepatocyte FGFR4 at early times, but counteracts the delay by acceleration of progression to HCC through interaction with ectopic FGFR1 once it appears in hepatoma cells. This indicates a dual function of FGF21 that may reflect changes in FGFR isotype during progression of differentiated hepatoma cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.