Aims. To investigate the impact of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in non-infarct-related artery (IRA) on the long-term prognosis and evaluate the clinical significance of staged revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods. 1266 STEMI patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were categorized as single-vessel disease (SVD), multivessel disease (MVD) without and with CTO. We study the clinical outcomes of patients after primary PCI in the following 3 years. Additionally, patients with CTO received staged revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 3-year follow-up were recorded. Results. Presence of CTO was a predictor of both early mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4–4.5, P < 0.01] and late mortality (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4–3.6, P < 0.01), whereas MVD without CTO was only a predictor of early mortality (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.3, P < 0.05). In CTO group, 100 patients had successful CTO recanalization, and 48 patients failed. During 3-year follow-up, patients with failed procedure had higher cardiac mortality (22.9% versus 9.0%, P = 0.020) and lower MACE-free survival (50.0% versus 72.0%, P = 0.009) compared to patients with successful procedure. Conclusion. The presence of CTO and not MVD alone is associated with long-term mortality. Successful revascularization of CTO in the non-IRA is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Background: No-/slow-reflow indicates worse outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with high thrombus burden. We examined whether deferred stenting (DS) strategy reduces no-/ slow-reflow or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for patients with acute STEMI and high thrombus burden. Methods:We performed an open-label, multi-center, prospective cohort study among eligible patients with acute STEMI and high thrombus burden who further received pPCI. All participants received PCI with DS (second procedure performed within 48-72 h) or immediate-stenting (IS) strategy. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow. We evaluated MACEs and bleeding events during hospitalization and at 30-and 90-day follow-ups. Results: We recruited 245 patients to this study, including 51 with DS and 194 with IS. Baseline clinical characters were comparable between the 2 strategies. Incidence of no-/slow-reflow defined by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade was not significantly different between the 2 strategies [DS: 5 (9.8%), IS: 33 (17.0%), P=0.21]. No-/slow-reflow by TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) was less prevalent in DS [20 (39.2%) vs. 107 (55.2%), P=0.04]. No significant differences were found in recurrence of myocardial infarction (P=0.56), cardiac death (P=0.37), all-cause mortality (P=0.37), heart failure-induced readmission (P=0.35), or bleeding (P=0.61) between the 2 strategies in-hospital, and at 30-and 90-day follow-up. Conclusions:In STEMI patients with high thrombus burden who underwent pPCI, DS strategy reduced no-/slow-reflow of microcirculation. However, DS strategy did not reduce incidence of MACEs or bleeding.

Background:No-/slow-reflow phenomenon (NRP) is a severe complication in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). This study aimed to explore the relationship between elevated serum uric acid (SUA) and NRP in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI, focusing on inflammation and angiographic findings.Methods: A total of 610 patients who received pPCI for STEMI were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into a hyperuricaemia group and a non-hyperuricaemia group according to SUA levels. Clinical information and angiographic indicators were compared between the two groups. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) <3 after stent implantation were defined as TIMI-NRP and TMPG-NRP, respectively. A logistic model was used to analyse the relationship between hyperuricaemia and NRP. Results:The hyperuricaemia group had a higher incidence of TIMI-NRP (24.9% vs 14.0%, p < .001) and TMPG-NRP (33.0% vs 24.9%, p = .03), higher levels of C-reactive protein (7.2 vs 4.1 mg/L, p < .001) and worse left ventricular ejection fraction (51.5% vs 54.0%, p = .002) than the non-hyperuricaemia group. As for angiographic findings, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of lesion characteristics measured by quantitative coronary angiography. After multivariable adjustment, elevated SUA was significantly associated with TIMI-NRP (odds ratio: 1.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-3.01, p = .003). Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of hyperuricaemia in TIMI-NRP was more pronounced in patients with delayed perfusion as well as in patients with diabetes mellitus.Conclusions: Elevated SUA is associated with severe inflammation and has higher incidence of TIMI-NRP in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI, especially in those with delayed perfusion or diabetes mellitus.

Background: Patients with chronic rheumatic heart disease (CRHD) have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), but the model to detect coexistent coronary artery stenosis prior to surgery has not been validated. Our study investigated whether the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is a valid predictor of CAD in patients undergoing surgery for CRHD. Methods: A total of 989 rheumatic patients were enrolled between 2005 and 2010. They were subdivided into two groups according to coronary angiography (CAG) results to identify potential factors in the development of CAD. Finally, all patients were assessed using the FRS to examine the association between the 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and CAD. Results: There were statistically significant inter-group differences in terms of age, sex, smoking, hypertension, bypass surgery and cardiac function in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification status (p < 0.05). We showed that the FRS had high accuracy in predicting CAD in female and male patients with CRHD. In the male group, the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting CAD was 0.904, with a specificity of 90.3% and sensitivity of 76.1%. In the female group, the AUC for predicting CAD was 0.924, with a specificity of 77.5% and sensitivity of 90.9%, respectively. With a cut-off point of a 10-year CVD risk of 12.5 (%) in the male group and a 10-year CVD risk