We studied silage fermentation of kudzu (KZ), sugarcane top (ST) and their mixtures treated with additives to be able to effectively use available local feed resources. The silages were prepared using KZ, ST, KZ 90% + ST 10%, KZ 80% + ST 20%, KZ 70% + ST 30% and KZ 60% + ST 40%, based on fresh matter (FM). These silages were treated with 10 colony-forming units/g epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 5% molasses and 0.02% cellulase of FM. The KZ contained higher crude protein (CP; 14.52%) content and lower levels of neutral detergent fiber (NDF; 62.15%) than those of ST (6.84% CP and 64.93% NDF) based on dry matter (DM). The KZ 60% + ST 40% silage fermented well with a higher (P < 0.05) lactic acid content and lower (P < 0.05) pH than those of the other mixed silages. Silages treated with molasses had lower (P < 0.05) ammonia-N, NDF, acid detergent fiber, and hemi-cellulose contents as well as pH, but higher (P < 0.05) DM, water-soluble carbohydrate, and lactic acid contents, than those of the control, LAB and cellulase treatments. The results confirmed that KZ 60% + ST 40% was the best mixing ratio to prepare silage, and molasses improved silage fermentation and fiber degradation.
Successful silage production depends on the promotion of lactic acid fermentation and one of the key factors influencing the fermentation quality of silage is lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Therefore, epiphytic LAB on grasses play an important role in silage production. The present research investigated the distribution of LAB on Pennisetum spp. and factors influencing its presence. Lactic acid bacteria on four grass cultivars, cv. MT‐1, cv. Mott, cv. Reyan No. 4 (Reyan) and cv. Guimu No. 1 (Guimu), were investigated by both culture‐dependent methods and 16S rRNA amplicon sequence analysis and polymerase chain reaction‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR‐DGGE). Mott grass had significantly lower contents of dry matter and lower pH and higher water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content than the other three cultivars (P < 0.05). Mott also epiphyted the largest number of LAB (2.56 × 103 cfu g−1), while MT‐1 supported the least (41 cfu g−1). A diversity of LAB were recovered from the species including the following proportional representation: 33.4% Lactobacillus plantarum, 8.3% Lactobacillus pentosus, 8.3% Lactococcus lactis, 8.3% Leuconostoc citreum, 25.0% Weissella confusa and 16.7% Weissella cibaria on Mott, 20.0% L. plantarum, 20.0% L. pentosus and 60.0% Lc. lactis on MT‐1, 83.3% L. plantarum and 16.7% Lc. lactis on Reyan, 16.7% L. plantarum and 83.3% Lc. lactis on Guimu. The DGGE analyses of rRNA amplicons also revealed a similar distribution of these species. While the species composition and abundance of LAB differed among the four grasses. The number of LAB on grasses was positively correlated with the WSC content in the grasses (P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with the pH of the grasses (P < 0.05).
Cancer becomes one of the main causes of human deaths in the world due to the high incidence and mortality rate and produces serious economic burdens. With more and more attention is paid on cancer, its therapies are getting more of a concern. Previous research has shown that the occurrence, progression, and treatment prognosis of malignant tumors are closely related to genetic and gene mutation. CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as a powerful method for making changes to the genome, which has extensively been applied in various cell lines. Establishing the cell and animal models by CRISPR/Cas9 laid the foundation for the clinical trials which possibly treated the tumor. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing technology brings a great promise for inhibiting migration, invasion, and even treatment of tumor. However, the potential off-target effect limits its clinical application, and the effective ethical review is necessary. The article reviews the molecular mechanisms of CRISPR/Cas9 and discusses the research and the limitation related to cancer clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.