The generalized uncertainty principle is often used to modify various thermodynamics systems by regarding the greater-than-equal relation as an approximate relation. We give a method to improve this approximation and compare the differences between the original and improved methods during the evaporation of black hole from two aspects of positive and negative parameters. Finally, we prove the rationality of the improved method and give some guiding opinions.
There have been many papers suggesting that the parameter of the generalized uncertainty principle should be negative rather than positive in some specific scenarios, and the negative parameter can remove the minimum length. However, the minimum length is a model-independent feature of quantum gravity and it should not be affected by the specific scenarios. In order to solve this contradiction, we derive a new generalized uncertainty principle to reflect a fixed and unified minimum length in both cases of positive and negative parameters.
The usual generalized uncertainty principle will lead to a divergent mass limit of white dwarf, and this divergence should be prevented for both scenarios including positive and negative parameters of generalized uncertainty principle. Although it has been shown that negative parameter can directly restore the mass limit, the underlying reason is not given to explain why the negative sign appears under the condition of white dwarf. In order to solve this problem, we derive a field-dependent parameter expression whose sign can change depending on the species of spin fields. Besides, we find that the actual physical effect of the negative sign is aimed at limiting the exorbitant uncertainty of momentum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.