A systematic study is presented herein on the seismic response of buried pipelines subjected to ground fault rupture in the form of normal faulting. In this study, advanced computational simulations are conducted in parallel with physical testing using a geotechnical centrifuge. For the numerical simulations, the pipeline was modeled using isotropic 3-D shell elements and the soil was modeled using either 1-D spring elements or 3-D solid (continuum) elements. The results from continuum finite-element analyses are compared with those from a Winkler-type model (in which the pipe is supported by a series of discrete springs) and with results from centrifuge tests. In addition, via appropriate modeling of the soil-pipe interaction, the q-z relation of the soil medium is elucidated for normal faulting events. The numerical analysis results demonstrate the potential for continuum modeling of events that induce pipe-soil interaction and results in improved understanding of pipe-soil interaction under normal faulting.

A systematic study of buried pipeline response to strike-slip faulting was performed wherein advanced computational simulations were conducted in parallel with a series of physical tests employing splitboxes within the geotechnical centrifuge at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the full-scale testing facility at Cornell University. This article describes the numerical modeling and simulations of the experimental tests. The buried pipeline and the surrounding soil are modeled using nonlinear beam (shell) elements and elasto-plastic springs distributed along the pipeline, respectively. Using the finite element method, reasonable predictions are obtained for the axial and bending strain distributions measured during the tests. It is also shown that finite element analysis using pipe beam elements and a modified soil spring model can accurately predict the pipeline seismic behavior due to strike-slip fault rupture, especially when the pipe is subjected to combined bending and tension. In addition, existing closed-form solutions are evaluated.

No abstract