Background To explore the value of magnetic resonance quantitative analysis using diffusion tensor imaging, T2 mapping, and intravoxel incoherent motion in the evaluation of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage and to compare the effects of various eccentric exercise modes at different time points in rats. Methods A total of 174 Sprague-Dawley male rats were randomly divided into five groups: control, once-only exercise, continuous exercise, intermittent exercise, and once-fatigue exercise groups. Each experimental group was divided into seven time-subgroups: 0.5 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, 120 h and 168 h after exercise. The quadriceps femoris muscles were then scanned using magnetic resonance imaging. The apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy values of diffusion tensor imaging, T2 values of T2 mapping, D and D* values of intravoxel incoherent motion and optical density values of desmin were measured. Associations among different eccentric exercise programmes, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and histopathological results were evaluated. Dunnett’s test, two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results Diffusion tensor imaging showed that the number of muscle fibre bundles decreased to varying degrees with different time points and eccentric exercises. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of the exercise groups showed a trend that first increased and then decreased, the opposite of fractional anisotropy. The specimens in all eccentric exercise programmes showed high signal T2 values after exercise, the highest among which was in the once-fatigue exercise group. D and D* in the experimental groups were significantly higher than those in the control group at 0.5–48 h after exercise. The apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, T2, D and D* values correlated with the optical density values of desmin. Conclusions Diffusion tensor imaging, T2 mapping, and intravoxel incoherent motion technology accurately reflect the degree of skeletal muscle damage and recovery associated with eccentric exercise. The degree of muscle damage was the lowest in the continuous exercise group and the highest in the once-fatigue exercise group, which may provide more information and guidance for the formulation of physical and athletic training programmes.
Background T2 mapping is useful for evaluating the cartilage matrix. Purpose To determine the variations in the acetabular cartilage T2 relaxation values between healthy individuals and those with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Material and Methods Thirty-three patients with unilateral DDH underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between January 2018 and February 2019. Fifteen volunteers (30 hips) were enrolled as controls. T2 values were measured with the T2 mapping sequence in all layers and were equally divided into three layers (deep, middle, and superficial) with equal thickness. We calculated the mean T2 relaxation values for the full thickness, deep, middle, and superficial layers and compared the values between the different groups. In addition, the inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated. Results The T2 relaxation values in the DDH arm were significantly lower in the middle, superficial, and full thickness layers compared with those of the volunteers and contralateral hips. The T2 relaxation values of the deep layers showed no significant difference between the different groups. The acetabular cartilage T2 relaxation values increased from the deep layer to the superficial layer in the control and contralateral groups. Both inter- and intra-observer agreements were good. Conclusion MRI T2 mapping may help to diagnose developmental disorders of the acetabular cartilage matrix in infants and children with DDH. Abnormal acetabular cartilage T2 relaxation values may be due to the extraordinary stress load of the femoral head.
Purpose: T2 mapping and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) enable the detection of changes in the skeletal muscle microenvironment. We assessed T2 relaxation times, DTI metrics, performed histological characterization of frostbite-induced skeletal muscle injury and repair, and provided diagnostic imaging biomarkers.Design and Methods: Thirty-six Sprague Dawley rats (200 ± 10 g) were obtained. Thirty rats were used for establishing a skeletal muscle frostbite model, and six were untreated controls. Functional MR sequences were performed on rats on days 0, 3, 5, 10, and 14 (n = 6 per time point). Rats were then sacrificed to obtain the quadriceps muscles. Tensor eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3), mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and T2 values were compared between the frostbite model and control rats. ImageJ was used to measure the extracellular area fraction (EAF), muscle fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA), and skeletal muscle tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and Myod1 expression. The correlation between the histological and imaging parameters of the frostbitten skeletal muscle was evaluated. Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test, Leven’s test, one-way ANOVA, and Spearman coefficient were used for analysis.Results: T2 relaxation time of frostbitten skeletal muscle was higher at all time points (p < 0.01). T2 relaxation time correlated with EAF, and TNF-α and Myod1 expression (r = 0.42, p < 0.05; r = 0.86, p < 0.01; r = 0.84, p < 0.01). The average tensor metrics (MD, λ1, λ2, and λ3) of skeletal muscle at 3 and 5 days of frostbite increased (p < 0.05), and fCSA correlated with λ1, λ2, and λ3, and MD (r = 0.65, p < 0.01; r = 0.48, p < 0.01; r = 0.52, p < 0.01; r = 0.62, p < 0.01).Conclusion: T2 mapping and DTI imaging detect frostbite-induced skeletal muscle injury early. This combined approach can quantitatively assess skeletal muscle repair and regeneration within 2 weeks of frostbite. Imaging biomarkers for the diagnosis of frostbite were suggested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.