Invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix involves the progression of premalignant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and is associated with persistent human papillomavirus infection. Most CINs will regress, and the challenge is to identify the lesions likely to progress to invasive cancer. We evaluated Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression in nonneoplastic cervix, CINs, and SCCs as a potential biomarker to predict disease progression. A total of 101 cases were selected including 29 CIN 1s, 32 CIN 2s, 16 CIN 3s, 2 microinvasive SCCs, and 22 invasive SCCs. Cervical nonneoplastic squamous epithelium showed weak positivity of SIRT1 in the basal layer. SIRT1 cytoplasmic overexpression was found in 13.8% of CIN 1s (4/29), 40.6% of CIN 2s (13/32), and 50% of CIN 3s (8/16), and it was statistically significant between CIN 1 and CIN 2/3 lesions (P=.01). All 24 cases of invasive and microinvasive SCC showed SIRT1 overexpression, with 25% (6/24) showing cytoplasmic staining only, 4.2% (1/24) showing nuclear staining only, and 70.8% (17/24) showing both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. From CIN 1 to SCC, SIRT1 expression showed steady and statistically significant increase (CIN 1 versus CIN 2-3, P=.01; CIN 2-3 versus SCC, P=.0001). Thus, SIRT1 may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting the progression of CIN to invasive SCC.
Objectives:
Patients with HIV infection have an increased risk of developing plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL). In this study, we reviewed the clinicopathologic features of PBL in HIV+ patients in the era of HAART from a single health center.
Design:
Retrospective study.
Methods:
The morphologic, immunophenotypic, and clinical features were reviewed in these HIV+ patients with PBL and univariate analysis was employed to determine the survival prognosis.
Results:
During the interval of 1 January 2008 to 30 December 2018, we identified 95 HIV+ patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas. Among these patients, there were 21 (22%) patients with PBL (19 men and two women; median age: 45 years). Seven patients had PBL at their initial HIV diagnosis and 14 developed PBL after a median interval of 7.7 months of HIV diagnosis. Lymph nodes (n = 10), oral cavity/sinonasal mass (n = 6), and rectal masses (n = 5) were the common involved sites, and five of 15 (33%) had bone marrow involvement. Lymphoma cells were immunoreactive for MUM-1/IRF4 (100%), CD138 (90%), CD45 (63%), CD79a (47%), and CD30 (25%). Proliferation rate assessed by Ki67 was at least 90% in 18 of 20 cases. Eighteen patients received chemotherapy including etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (n = 13) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (n = 2). With a median follow-up time of 19 months, nine out of 17 patients died. Bone marrow involvement was associated with a poorer overall survival (median: 4.7 months, P = 0.015).
Conclusion:
PBL is the second most common type of aggressive lymphoma and often presents in lymph nodes of patients with poorly controlled HIV infection. Bone marrow involvement is associated with a poorer outcome.
Objectives
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have recently emerged as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. In our previous study, we proposed that tumor stroma should also be considered in the calculation of TILs and we introduced tumor infiltration lymphocyte volume (TILV) in triple-negative breast cancer.
Methods
We assessed the disease-free survival predictive value of TILV in all subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma and compared the predictive value of TILV with TILs. Differences between disease-free survival curves were determined by using the log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier survival plots were generated for both groups.
Results
TILV was significantly correlated with disease-free survival in both invasive ductal carcinoma (P = .03) and all subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma (P = .043), whereas TILs failed to show a statistical significance.
Conclusions
Tumor-stroma ratio needs to be considered in estimation of tumor immunity, and TILV adds more predictive power to TILs.
Objectives
Malignant effusion is usually caused by metastatic carcinoma. Malignant lymphoma is often not included as a top differential diagnosis of malignant effusion. Here, we describe 3 cases of young female patients with no significant past medical history who presented with fluid overload and were diagnosed with high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL).
Methods
We conducted histopathologic examination and immunophenotypic and cytogenetic analyses on three cases using immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and karyotyping. We also included patients’ clinical and radiological findings in our case reports.
Results
Histologic examination of the effusion samples showed numerous intermediate to large lymphoma cells with irregular nuclear contours and fine chromatin. The lymphoma cells were positive for CD10, CD20, BCL2, BCL6, and PAX5 and negative for CD34, cyclin D1, HHV-8, and TdT. In situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)–encoded small RNAs was negative. The proliferation index by Ki-67 stain was more than 80%. Flow cytometry showed CD10-positive B cells with monotypic immunoglobulin light chain expression. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis demonstrated MYC, BCL2, or BCL6 rearrangements. These 3 patients were diagnosed as having HGBL with double-/triple-hit rearrangements. Despite receiving aggressive chemotherapy, all 3 patients had a dismal clinical course, with 2 patients dying less than 2 years after initial diagnosis.
Conclusions
High-grade B-cell lymphoma should be considered in the differential diagnoses of malignant effusions. Flow cytometric and FISH analyses of the body fluid specimens are essential to reach an accurate and timely diagnosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.