Background: Given the different methods of assessing emphysema, controversy exists as to whether it is associated with lung cancer.Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between chest CT-defined emphysema and the presence of lung cancer. Materials and Methods:The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 15, 2021, to identify studies on the association between emphysema assessed visually or quantitatively with CT and lung cancer. Associations were determined by emphysema severity (trace, mild, or moderate to severe, assessed visually and quantitatively) and subtype (centrilobular and paraseptal, assessed visually). Overall and stratified pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs were obtained.Results: Of the 3343 screened studies, 21 studies (107 082 patients) with 26 subsets were included. The overall pooled ORs for lung cancer given the presence of emphysema were 2.3 (95% CI: 2.0, 2.6; I 2 = 35%; 19 subsets) and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.02; six subsets) per 1% increase in low attenuation area. Studies with visual (pooled OR, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9, 2.6; I 2 = 48%; 12 subsets) and quantitative (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 2.8; I 2 = 3.7%; eight subsets) assessments yielded comparable results for the dichotomous assessment. Based on six studies (1716 patients), the pooled ORs for lung cancer increased with emphysema severity and were higher for visual assessment (2.5, 3.7, and 4.5 for trace, mild, and moderate to severe, respectively) than for quantitative assessment (1.9, 2.2, and 2.5) based on point estimates. Compared with no emphysema, only centrilobular emphysema (three studies) was associated with lung cancer (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 3.2; P , .001). Conclusion:Both visual and quantitative CT assessments of emphysema were associated with a higher odds of lung cancer, which also increased with emphysema severity. Regarding subtype, only centrilobular emphysema was significantly associated with lung cancer.Clinical trial registration no. CRD42021262163

Importance: The incidence of dyslipidemia increases after menopause. Menopause hormone therapy (MHT) is recommended for menopause related disease. However, it is benefit for lipid profiles is inconclusive.Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of MHT on lipid profile in postmenopausal women.Evidence Review: Related articles were searched on PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2020. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed using the “Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist”.Results: Seventy-three eligible studies were selected. The results showed that MHT significantly decreased the levels of TC (WMD: −0.43, 95% CI: −0.53 to −0.33), LDL-C (WMD: −0.47, 95% CI: −0.55 to −0.40) and LP (a) (WMD: −49.46, 95% CI: −64.27 to −34.64) compared with placebo or no treatment. Oral MHT led to a significantly higher TG compared with transdermal MHT (WMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04–0.21). The benefits of low dose MHT on TG was also concluded when comparing with conventional-dose estrogen (WMD: −0.18, 95% CI: −0.32 to −0.03). The results also showed that conventional MHT significantly decreased LDL-C (WMD: −0.35, 95% CI: −0.50 to −0.19), but increase TG (WMD: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.18–0.65) compared with tibolone. When comparing with the different MHT regimens, estrogen (E) + progesterone (P) regimen significantly increased TC (WMD: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.20), LDL-C (WMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07–0.17) and Lp(a) (WMD: 44.58, 95% CI:28.09–61.06) compared with estrogen alone.Conclusion and Relevance: MHT plays a positive role in lipid profile in postmenopausal women, meanwhile for women with hypertriglyceridemia, low doses or transdermal MHT or tibolone would be a safer choice. Moreover, E + P regimen might blunt the benefit of estrogen on the lipid profile.Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018092924], identifier [No. CRD42018092924].

BackgroundThe present study focused on understanding the prognostic value of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) single nucleotide polymorphisms rs1801133 (C667T) and rs1801131 (A1298C) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in March 2016. Databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Chinese databases (including CNKI, Wanfang and VIP), were searched to identify the relevant articles describing MTHFR polymorphisms in patients with CRC. Data regarding overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were collected and analysed.ResultsTwenty‐four studies with 5423 patients with CRC were included. Significant differences in OS, PFS and DFS were not observed among the different comparisons of patients carrying different alleles of the MTHFR rs1801133 polymorphism (including TT versus CC, TT versus CT + CC, CT + TT versus CC and CT versus CC). Compared with patients with the rs1801131 CA + AA genotypes, patients with the CC genotype had a shorter OS (hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% confidence interval = 1.30–2.65) and DFS (hazard ratio = 2.16; 95% confidence interval= 1.19–3.93). Significant differences in OS, PFS and DFS were not observed among the other patient groups (including CC versus AA, CC + CA versus AA and CA versus AA). Subgroup analysis of rs1801133 and rs1801131 showed that patients with CRC from Asian regions and Western regions demonstrated similar results.ConclusionsThe MTHFR rs1801133 polymorphism was not associated with the prognosis of patients with CRC; however, rs1801131 may be associated with the prognosis of patients with CRC. Well‐designed prospective studies are necessary to obtain a better understanding of the prognostic value of rs1801133 and rs1801131.

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the association between visual emphysema and the presence of lung nodules, and Lung-RADS category with low-dose CT (LDCT). Methods Baseline LDCT scans of 1162 participants from a lung cancer screening study (Nelcin-B3) performed in a Chinese general population were included. The presence, subtypes, and severity of emphysema (at least trace) were visually assessed by one radiologist. The presence, size, and classification of non-calcified lung nodules (≥ 30 mm3) and Lung-RADS category were independently assessed by another two radiologists. Multivariable logistic regression and stratified analyses were performed to estimate the association between emphysema and lung nodules, Lung-RADS category, after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, pack-years, and passive smoking. Results Emphysema and lung nodules were observed in 674 (58.0%) and 424 (36.5%) participants, respectively. Participants with emphysema had a 71% increased risk of having lung nodules (adjusted odds ratios, aOR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.26–2.31) and 70% increased risk of positive Lung-RADS category (aOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.09–2.66) than those without emphysema. Participants with paraseptal emphysema (n = 47, 4.0%) were at a higher risk for lung nodules than those with centrilobular emphysema (CLE) (aOR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.32–4.50 and aOR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23–2.09, respectively). Only CLE was associated with positive Lung-RADS category (p = 0.02). CLE severity was related to a higher risk of lung nodules (ranges aOR: 1.44–2.61, overall p < 0.01). Conclusion In a Chinese general population, visual emphysema based on LDCT is independently related to the presence of lung nodules (≥ 30 mm3) and specifically CLE subtype is related to positive Lung-RADS category. The risk of lung nodules increases with CLE severity. Key Points • Participants with emphysema had an increased risk of having lung nodules, especially smokers. • Participants with PSE were at a higher risk for lung nodules than those with CLE, but nodules in participants with CLE had a higher risk of positive Lung-RADS category. • The risk of lung nodules increases with CLE severity.