No abstract

No abstract

Zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes were coated onto polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes by interfacial polymerization of amine and acid chloride monomers in the presence of Linde type A zeolite nanocrystals. A matrix of three different interfacial polymerization chemistries and three different-sized zeolite crystals produced nanocomposite thin films with widely varying structure, morphology, charge, hydrophilicity, and separation performance (evaluated as reverse osmosis membranes). Pure polyamide film properties were tuned by changing polymerization chemistry, but addition of zeolite nanoparticles produced even greater changes in separation performance, surface chemistry, and film morphology. For fixed polymer chemistry, addition of zeolite nanoparticles formed more permeable, negatively charged, and thicker polyamide films. Smaller zeolites produced greater permeability enhancements, but larger zeolites produced more favorable surface properties; hence, nanoparticle size may be considered an additional "degree of freedom" in designing thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes. The data presented offer additional support for the hypothesis that zeolite crystals alter polyamide thin film structure when they are present during the interfacial polymerization reaction.

Although silver nanoparticles are being exploited widely in antimicrobial applications, the mechanisms underlying silver nanoparticle antimicrobial properties in environmentally relevant media are not fully understood. The latter point is critical for understanding potential environmental impacts of silver nanoparticles. The aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of inorganic aquatic chemistry on silver nanoparticle stability (aggregation, dissolution, reprecipitation) and bacterial viability. A synthetic "fresh water" matrix was prepared comprising various combinations of cations and anions while maintaining a fixed ionic strength. Aggregation and dissolution of silver nanoparticles was influenced by electrolyte composition; experimentally determined ionic silver concentrations were about half that predicted from a thermodynamic model and about 1000 times lower than the maximum dispersed silver nanoparticle concentration. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles was much lower than Ag(+) ions when compared on the basis of total mass added; however, the actual concentrations of dissolved silver were the same regardless of how silver was introduced. Bacterial inactivation also depended on bacteria cell type (Gram-positive/negative) as well as the hardness and alkalinity of the suspending media. These simple, but systematic studies--enabled by high-throughput screening--reveal the inherent complexity associated with understanding silver nanoparticle antibacterial efficacy as well as potential environmental impacts of silver nanoparticles.

Extended DLVO interaction potentials were determined for spherical particles approaching nanopatterned substrates using the numerical surface element integration (SEI) technique. In most cases, nanopatterned ("rough") surfaces produced smaller interaction potentials than chemically identical planar ("smooth") surfaces. For unfavorable scenarios, electrostatic double layer and acid-base potentials were reduced to a greater extent than van der Waals potentials, which made rough surfaces "more attractive" than smooth ones. Two influential surface morphological descriptors emerged: (1) the ratio of particle size to asperity size, a/r, and (2) the ratio of asperity separation to asperity size, p/r. As a/r increased, particle-substrate interaction energy decreased, while the opposite was true for p/r. The simple morphological descriptors gave rise to an analytical model based on the Derjaguin integration (DI) method that compared reasonably well with numerical SEI results, where the size and density of nanopatterned surface features dictated the magnitude of interaction potentials. In fact, changes in the size of nanopatterned surface features impacted the magnitudes of interaction potentials to the same extent as similar changes in the magnitudes of acid-base free energy and zeta potential, which begs the question, "is surface morphology a 'scapegoat' or a primary consideration when defining particle-substrate interactions?"

Organic fouling plagues many environmental membrane processes. In this study, well-controlled laboratory experiments were performed to elucidate seawater RO membrane fouling by alginic acid. Interfacial free energies derived from multiple probe liquid contact angle analyses (including different seawater matrices) correlated strongly with the rates of membrane fouling. More importantly, the Lewis acid-base interfacial free energy quantitatively described the impacts of calcium-carboxylate complex formation and predicted membrane fouling and cleaning behavior. Calcium ions made polyamide composite RO membranes (and alginic acid) more hydrophobic, enhanced the rate and extent of flux decline, and reduced the effectiveness of chemical cleaning. The implications for seawater RO membrane fouling are clear. Selective removal of calcium ions via pretreatment can reduce the gel forming ability of carboxylate rich biomacromolecules and, hence, the extent to which they foul RO membranes. In addition, RO membranes should be produced with smooth, hydrophilic interfaces comprising monopolar electron-donor functionality and no carboxylic acid residue. More broadly, this paper presents a facile approach for quantifying the impacts of specific ion interactions on aquatic colloid stability, aggregation, and deposition.

Onset of TSS was generally insidious but may be triggered acutely by apparently trivial events. Myelopathy mainly affected the lower limbs. The most common cause was OLF in the lower thoracic spine. Cervical or lumbar spinal disease was often also evident; therefore, comprehensive clinical assessment is required to avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.

Mounting evidence reveals a continuing disconnect between resistin's role in rodents and humans due to significant differences between these two species with respect to resistin's gene and protein structure, differential gene regulation, tissue-specific distribution, and insulin resistance induction as well as a paucity of evidence regarding the resistin receptor and downstream signaling mechanisms of action.