BackgroundDiabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common chronic complications of diabetes and the strongest initiating risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration. Early diagnosis of DPN through screening measures is, therefore, of great importance for diabetic patients. Recently, shear wave elastography (SWE) has been used as a method that is complementary to neuroelectrophysiological examination in the diagnosis of DPN. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis based on currently available data to evaluate the performance of tibial nerve stiffness on SWE for diagnosing DPN.MethodsBoth PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of SWE for DPN up to March 1th, 2022. Three measures of diagnostic test performance, including the summary area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), the summary sensitivity and specificity, and the summary diagnostic odds ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SWE. All included studies were published between 2017 and 2021.ResultsSix eligible studies (with 170 DPN patients, 28 clinically defined DPN patients, 168 non-DPN patients, and 154 control participants) that evaluated tibial nerve stiffness were included for meta-analysis. The summary sensitivity and specificity of SWE for tibial nerve stiffness were 75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68–80%) and 86% (95% CI: 80–90%), respectively, and the summary AUROC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81–0.87), for diagnosing DPN. A subgroup analysis of five two-dimensional SWE studies revealed similar diagnostic performance, showing the summary sensitivity and specificity of 77% (95% CI: 69–83%) and 86% (95% CI: 79–91%), respectively, and a summary AUROC value of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83–0.89).ConclusionsSWE is found to have good diagnostic accuracy for detecting DPN and has considerable potential as an important and noninvasive adjunctive tool in the management of patients with DPN.
BackgroundAspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) are the two most widely studied noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for liver fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) using liver biopsy as the reference standard.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for studies (published as of May 1st, 2021) that assessed the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 for liver fibrosis in AIH. The summary area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for detecting liver fibrosis.ResultsFourteen studies (including 1015 patients) were selected with 13 studies each evaluating the use of APRI and FIB-4 for detecting different stages of fibrosis in AIH. For prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, the summary AUROC value was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–0.70], 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67–0.75), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71–0.79) for APRI, and the summary AUROC value was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71–0.79), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69–0.77) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75–0.82) for FIB-4, respectively. The summary sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 90% and 36%, 78% and 55%, and 77% and 61% for APRI, and 70% and 70%, 65% and 70%, and 78% and 65% for FIB-4, respectively.ConclusionsAPRI and FIB-4 showed suboptimal diagnostic performance for identifying liver fibrosis in AIH with mediocre sensitivity and specificity.
BackgroundBiliary atresia (BA) is a severe inflammatory obliterative cholangiopathy of infancy that requires early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention. In this study, we aimed to obtain comprehensive evidence on the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement by ultrasound elastography in the detection of BA through a meta-analysis.MethodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography in the detection of BA up to January 10, 2022. In this study, in order to summarize the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) modeling was constructed. Heterogeneity was estimated with the I2 statistic. Multiple subgroup analyses were also performed.ResultsFourteen studies from eleven articles, including 774 BA patients, 850 non-BA patients, and 173 controls were included in the present meta-analysis. The summary sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound elastography for liver stiffness were 85% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79–89%] and 82% (95% CI: 73–88%) with the I2 value of 82.90 and 84.33%, respectively. The area under the SROC curve (AUROC) using ultrasound elastography for diagnosing BA was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92). In addition, a subgroup analysis of 9 two-dimensional shear wave elastography studies was also performed. Subgroup analysis revealed that the summary sensitivity and specificity were 85% (95% CI: 77–91%) and 79% (95% CI: 71–86%), respectively, and the summary AUROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92).ConclusionsUltrasound elastography exhibits good diagnostic accuracy for BA and can be served as a non-invasive tool to facilitate the differential diagnosis of BA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.