p53 monitors genomic integrity at the G1 and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints. Cells lacking p53 may show gene ampli®cation as well as the polyploidy or aneuploidy typical of many tumors. The pathways through which this develops, however, are not well de®ned. We demonstrate here that the combination of p53 inactivation and c-myc overexpression in diploid cells markedly accelerates the spontaneous development of tetraploidy. This is not seen with either N-myc or L-myc. Tetraploidy is accompanied by signi®cantly higher levels of cyclin B and its associated cdc2 kinase activity. Mitotic spindle poisons accelerate the appearance of tetraploidy in cells either lacking functional p53 or overexpressing c-myc whereas the combination is additive. Restoration of p53 function in cells overexpressing c-myc causing rapid apoptosis, indicating that cells yet to become tetraploid have nonetheless suered irreversible genomic and/or mitotic spindle damage. In the face of normal p53 function, such damage would either be repaired or trigger apoptotis. We propose that loss of p53 and overexpression of c-myc permits the emergence and survival of cells with increasingly severe damage and the eventual development of tetraploidy.

No abstract

c-myc nullizygous fibroblasts (KO cells) were used to compare the abilities of c-myc, N-myc and L-myc oncoproteins to accelerate growth, promote apoptosis, revert morphology, and regulate the expression of previously described c-myc target genes. All three myc oncoproteins were expressed following retroviral transduction of KO cells. The proteins all enhanced the growth rate of KO cells and significantly shortened the cell cycle transition time. They also accelerated apoptosis following serum deprivation, reverted the abnormal KO cell morphology, and modulated the expression of previously described c-myc target genes. In most cases, Lmyc was equivalent to c-myc and N-myc in restoring all of the c-myc-dependent activities. These findings contrast with the previously reported weak transforming and transactivating properties of L-myc. Myc oncoproteins may thus impart both highly similar as well as dissimilar signals to the cells in which they are expressed. Cell Death and Differentiation (2000) 7, 697 ± 705.

Mad proteins are basic ± helix ± loop ± helix ± leucine zipper (bHLH-ZIP)-containing members of the myc oncoprotein network. They interact with the bHLH-ZIP protein max, compete for the same DNA binding sites as myc-max heterodimers and down-regulate mycresponsive genes. Using the bHLH-ZIP domain of mad1 as a yeast two-hybrid`bait', we identi®ed Mmip-2, a novel RING ®nger protein that interacts with all mad members, but weakly or not at all with c-myc, max or unrelated bHLH or bZIP proteins. The mad1-Mmip-2 interaction is mediated by the ZIP domain in the former protein and by at least two regions in the latter which do not include the RING ®nger. Mmip-2 can disrupt maxmad DNA binding and can reverse the suppressive eects of mad proteins on c-myc-responsive target genes and on c-myc+ras-mediated focus formation in ®broblasts. Tagging with spectral variants of green¯uorescent protein showed that Mmip-2 and mad proteins reside in separate cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, respectively. When co-expressed, however, the proteins interact and translocate to the cellular compartment occupied by the more abundant protein. These observations suggest a novel way by which Mmip-2 can modulate the transcriptional activity of myc oncoproteins.