To understand the high variability of the asymptomatic interval between primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection and the development of AIDS, we studied the evolution of the C2-V5 region of the HIV-1 env gene and of T-cell subsets in nine men with a moderate or slow rate of disease progression. They were monitored from the time of seroconversion for a period of 6 to 12 years until the development of advanced disease in seven men. Based on the analysis of viral divergence from the founder strain, viral population diversity within sequential time points, and the outgrowth of viruses capable of utilizing the CXCR4 receptor (X4 viruses), the existence of three distinct phases within the asymptomatic interval is suggested: an early phase of variable duration during which linear increases (∼1% per year) in both divergence and diversity were observed; an intermediate phase lasting an average of 1.8 years, characterized by a continued increase in divergence but with stabilization or decline in diversity; and a late phase characterized by a slowdown or stabilization of divergence and continued stability or decline in diversity. X4 variants emerged around the time of the early- to intermediate-phase transition and then achieved peak representation and began a decline around the transition between the intermediate and late phases. The late-phase transition was also associated with failure of T-cell homeostasis (defined by a downward inflection in CD3+ T cells) and decline of CD4+ T cells to ≤200 cells/μl. The strength of these temporal associations between viral divergence and diversity, viral coreceptor specificity, and T-cell homeostasis and subset composition supports the concept that the phases described represent a consistent pattern of viral evolution during the course of HIV-1 infection in moderate progressors. Recognition of this pattern may help explain previous conflicting data on the relationship between viral evolution and disease progression and may provide a useful framework for evaluating immune damage and recovery in untreated and treated HIV-1 infections.
Forest soils store vast amounts of terrestrial carbon, but we are still limited in mechanistic understanding on how soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization or turnover is controlled by biotic and abiotic factors in forest ecosystems. We used phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) as biomarker to study soil microbial community structure and measured activities of five extracellular enzymes involved in the degradation of cellulose (i.e., β-1,4-glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase), chitin (i.e., β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase), and lignin (i.e., phenol oxidase and peroxidase) as indicators of soil microbial functioning in carbon transformation or turnover across varying biotic and abiotic conditions in a typical temperate forest ecosystem in central China. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed to determine the interrelationship between individual PFLAs and biotic and abiotic site factors as well as the linkage between soil microbial structure and function. Path analysis was further conducted to examine the controls of site factors on soil microbial community structure and the regulatory pathway of changes in SOC relating to microbial community structure and function. We found that soil microbial community structure is strongly influenced by water, temperature, SOC, fine root mass, clay content, and C/N ratio in soils and that the relative abundance of Gram-negative bacteria, saprophytic fungi, and actinomycetes explained most of the variations in the specific activities of soil enzymes involved in SOC transformation or turnover. The abundance of soil bacterial communities is strongly linked with the extracellular enzymes involved in carbon transformation, whereas the abundance of saprophytic fungi is associated with activities of extracellular enzymes driving carbon oxidation. Findings in this study demonstrate the complex interactions and linkage among plant traits, microenvironment, and soil physiochemical properties in affecting SOC via microbial regulations.
Although enteric glial cells (EGCs) have been demonstrated to play a key role in maintaining intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, it is not known how EGCs regulate this integrity. We therefore hypothesized that glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) produced by EGCs might be involved in this regulation. Here we investigated the role of GDNF in regulating epithelial barrier function in vivo. Recombinant adenoviral vectors encoding GDNF (Ad-GDNF) were administered intracolonically in experimental colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium (DSS). The disease activity index (DAI) and histological score were measured. Epithelial permeability was assayed using Evans blue dye. The anti-apoptotic potency of GDNF in vivo was evaluated. The expression of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity were measured by ELISA assay and/or RT-PCR. The expression of ZO-1, Akt, caspase-3, and NF-kappaB p65 was analysed by western blot assay. Our results showed that GDNF resulted in a significant reduction in enhanced permeability, inhibited MPO activity, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha expression, and increased ZO-1 and Akt expression. Moreover, GDNF strongly prevented apoptosis in vivo and significantly ameliorated experimental colitis. Our findings indicate that GDNF participates directly in restoring epithelial barrier function in vivo via reduction of increased epithelial permeability and inhibition of mucosal inflammatory response, and is efficacious in DSS-induced colitis. These findings support the notion that EGCs are able to regulate intestinal epithelial barrier integrity indirectly via their release of GDNF in vivo. GDNF is namely an important mediator of the cross-talk between EGCs and mucosal epithelial cells. GDNF may be a useful therapeutic approach to the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.
The PI3K/Akt signal transduction pathway is involved in the regulation and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and plays an important role in the development and progression of UC.
Sulfur dioxide has recently been found to be produced endogenously in the cardiovascular system and have important positive biological effects. However, it is unknown whether sulfur dioxide preconditioning has a protective effect on rat myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and whether this process involves endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). In this study, we showed that preconditioning with sulfur dioxide 10 min before ischemia (with a low concentration of sulfur dioxide of 1-10 μmol/kg) could reduce myocardial infarct size and plasma activities of lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase in rats with I/R in vivo. Sulfur dioxide preconditioning also reduced myocardium apoptosis induced by I/R. In addition, sulfur dioxide preconditioning increased cardiac function in vitro. Sulfur dioxide preconditioning induced expression of myocardial glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation of the factor 2α-subunit (p-eIF2α) prior to myocardial I/R but suppressed expression of myocardial GRP78, C/EBP homologous protein, and p-eIF2α during myocardial I/R, in association with improved myocardial injury in vivo and in vitro. Pretreatment with dithiothreitol, an ERS stimulator mimicked the above cardioprotective effect. However, pretreatment with the ERS inhibitor 4-phenylbutyrate reversed the cardioprotection provided by sulfur dioxide preconditioning. These data indicated that sulfur dioxide preconditioning reduced I/R-induced myocardial injury in vivo and in vitro, and that augmenting ERS by sulfur dioxide preconditioning prior to I/R contributed to protection against myocardial I/R injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.