This article describes an electrospinning process to fabricate double-layered ultrafine fibers. A bioabsorbable polymer, Polycaprolactone (PCL), was used as the outer layer or the shell and two medically pure drugs, Resveratrol (RT, a kind of antioxidant) and Gentamycin Sulfate (GS, an antibiotic), were used as the inner layers or the cores. Morphology and microstructure of the ultrafine fibers were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), whereas mechanical performance of them was understood through tensile test. In vitro degradation rates of the nanofibrous membranes were determined by measuring their weight loss when immersed in pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) mixed with certain amount of Pseudomonas lipase for a maximum of 7 days. The drug release behaviors of the RT and GS were measured using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, respectively. It has been found that the drug solutions without any fiber-forming additive could be encapsulated in the PCL ultrafine fibers, although they alone cannot be made into a fiber form. Beads on the fiber surface influenced the tensile behavior of the ultrafine fibers remarkably. When the core solvent was miscible with the shell solvent, higher drug concentration decreased the bead formation and thus favored the mechanical performance. The situation, however, became different if the two solvents were immiscible with each other. The degradation rate was closely related to hydrophilicity of the drugs in the cores. Higher hydrophilicity apparently led to faster degradation. The release profiles of the RT and GS exhibited a sustained release characteristic, with no burst release phenomenon.

In this work, drug-loaded fibers and threads were successfully fabricated by combining electrospinning with aligned fibers collection. Two different electrospinning processes, that is, blend and coaxial electrospinning, to incorporate a model drug tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) into poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) fibers have been used and compared with each other. The resulting composite ultrafine fibers and threads were characterized through scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and tensile testing. It has been shown that average diameters of the fibers made from the same polymer concentration depended on the processing method. The blend TCH/ PLLA fibers showed the smallest fiber diameter, whereas neat PLLA fibers and core-shell TCH-PLLA fibers showed a larger proximal average diameter. Higher rotating speed of a wheel collector is helpful for obtaining better-aligned fibers. Both the polymer and the drug in the electrospun fibers have poor crystalline property. In vitro release study indicated that threads made from the core-shell fibers could suppress the initial burst release and provide a sustained drug release useful for the release of growth factor or other therapeutic drugs. On the other hand, the threads from the blend fibers produced a large initial burst release that may be used to prevent bacteria infection. A combination of these results suggests that electrospinning technique provides a novel way to fabricate medical agents-loaded fibrous threads for tissue suturing and tissue regeneration applications.2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 89A: [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95] 2009

No abstract

No abstract

Functional core-shell structured composite nanofibers can be fabricated through electrospinning of two polymer solutions in a coaxial, two-capillary spinneret system. Composite nanofibers, polycarbonate (PC, shell)/ polyurethane (PU, core), have been developed by this technique. Morphological, structural, infrared spectroscopy, and mechanical performance are conducted for the developed nanofibers. Their applications as textile materials have been explored. POLYM. COMPOS., 27: 381-387, 2006.

To develop a novel functional composite material for textile application, a coaxial electrospinning technique was investigated to electrospin two different polymer solutions into core‐shell structured nanofibers in which polyurethane and polycarbonate were used as core and shell materials, respectively. The resultant nanofibers were subsequently characterized by means of scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscopy, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and tensile mechanical test. Furthermore, water vapour transmission rate and pliability of the resulting nonwoven mats were also measured. The preliminary results indicated that it is feasible to attach composite nanofibers, with possible fictionalization on the shell material, onto a substrate fabric. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers

No abstract

To develop a novel functional fibrous scaffold, a blend‐electrospinning technique was applied to transfer polyurethane/inorganic‐particles solutions into nanofibers, in which titanium dioxide, copper, or/and silver nanoparticles were used. The resultant nanofibers were subsequently characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and tensile mechanical test. Furthermore, the structural change and the thermal properties of the electrospun fabrics were examined by X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry, respectively. Antibacterial performance of the resulting nanofibrous mats on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was also measured. Experimental results have shown that when the ratio of polyurethane solution and titanium dioxide sol was in 3.5:1, 89.55% of the Escherichia coli and 82.35% of the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria were killed under a UV‐light activation. However, the introduction of silver or/and cuprum nanoparticles into the polyurethane/TiO2 (in the ratio of 3.5:1) nanofibers led to a significant improvement in their antibacterial ability without any photocatalysis.POLYM. COMPOS., 33:2045–2057, 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers