NF1 patients display CNS abnormalities including learning disabilities, clumsiness, astrocytomas, and abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging exams. To determine whether the cellular and neuroanatomical distribution of neurofibromin reveals possible function for neurofibromin in the brain, we stained rat brain tissue sections with anti-neurofibromin antibodies. Neurofibromin is highly enriched in large projection neurons, such as cortical and hippocampal pyramidal cells and cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neurofibromin is present in cell bodies and in axons, but is highly enriched in dendrites. Immunoelectron microscopic analysis demonstrates that NF1 is associated with smooth vesiculotubular elements and cisternal stacks and with multivesicular bodies in the cell body and dendrites, but not with the plasma membrane, nucleus, nuclear envelope, Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, or rough endoplasmic reticulum. The preferential localization of neurofibromin to the smooth endoplasmic reticulum, together with evidence that neurofibromin modulates ras GTPase activity, suggests that some, if not all, of the CNS manifestations of NF1 might result from the altered expression of neurofibromin in neurons, perhaps through disruption of Ca2+ signaling, translocation of organelles, or endocytic pathways.

Summary Freshwater polyculture systems should efficiently utilise natural food resources and pond habitats with the consequent effects of reducing costs and increasing productivity. However, understanding of the primary carbon sources and food web within polyculture ponds, and especially macrophyte‐dominated ponds, remains limited. Stable‐isotope analysis was used to identify the main carbon sources and describe the trophic patterns of freshwater fauna in a polyculture pond around Lake Gucheng, China. An isotope mixing model (SIAR) was also used to estimate the relative contribution of four basal sources (suspended particulate organic matter [SPOM], sedimentary organic matter [SOM], macrophytes and epiphytes) to invertebrates and different fish trophic groups. Basal resources showed distinct δ13C values, ranging from −24.3 to −20.5‰, which allowed for a powerful discrimination of carbon sources. Consumers were also well separated in δ13C (−24.0 to −20.0‰ for invertebrates and −24.4 to −18.9‰ for fish), suggesting considerable differences in ultimate sources of carbon. Results from the SIAR model indicated that epiphytes were the most important carbon sources for crustaceans, herbivorous fish, omnivorous fish and piscivorous fish, while SPOM made the highest contribution to zooplankton, chironomids, molluscs, annelids, planktivorous fish and benthivorous fish. Mean δ15N values, combined with calculated food source contributions, were used to elucidate the food‐web structure of this polyculture pond, which suggested that carbon fixed by primary producers could be transported up the food chain to piscivorous fish through four main trophic pathways: one based mainly on SPOM, one on both SPOM and SOM, one on SPOM, SOM, macrophytes and epiphytes, and one based on both macrophytes and epiphytes. Our results emphasised the trophic importance of epiphytes on submerged macrophytes, a key component in the polyculture ponds, for the main culture species: Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis: Varunidae), freshwater shrimp (Macrobrachium nipponense: Palaemonidae), and high‐value piscivorous fish. This study also revealed the high level of complexity of polyculture pond food webs, and suggests that a diversity of major trophic pathways may be a characteristic of macrophyte‐dominated aquatic ecosystems.

No abstract