Background Surgical incision, endotracheal intubation, structural changes in the oral cavity, and other factors lead to a divergence in oral care between patients after oral surgery and ordinary inpatients. High-quality oral care can reduce the incidence of incision infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, there is a lack of guidelines or expert consensus on oral care after oral cancer surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the practicing situation of nurses in the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative patients with oral cancer and their need for training. Methods A multicenter cross-sectional study design was conducted in 19 ICUs of 11 tertiary hospitals from Henan province in China. Data were collected from 173 nurses and 19 head nurses online using a structured questionnaire. Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were performed to analyze the data using SPSS (Version 25.0). Results Seven ICUs (36.8%) developed evaluation regulations for the oral care of postoperative patients with oral cancer, and eight ICUs (42.1%) described the operating standards. A total of 173 nurses completed the questionnaire, and the median score was 75 (68, 78). Almost all of the examined nurses (91.2%) assessed patients’ oral hygiene at a fixed time, while in 52.0% and 28.3% of nurses, the first oral care and frequency of oral care after surgery was determined based on the individual patient’s situation. More than half of the nurses (55.5%) spent approximately 5–10 min conducting oral care for patients. Physiological saline solution (82.7%), swabbing (91.9%), and oral care package with cotton ball (86.1%) were the most popular oral care mouthwash, method, and tool, respectively. Nurses sought help from senior nurses (87.3%) and doctors (83.8%), mostly to solve difficulties of oral care. Moreover, 76.9% of the nurses believed that the lack of knowledge and skills surrounding oral care was the main barrier for nurses to implement oral care. The majority of participants (69.4%) had never received continuing education or training in oral care for postoperative patients with oral cancer, and almost all (98.8%) of the respondents stated their preference to receive training in standardized oral care skills. Indications and contraindications (84.4%), tools (81.5%), and mouthwash (80.9%) of oral care were the items that the respondents were most eager to learn about. Approximately three quarters of nurses preferred scenario simulation practice as the training method. Conclusion Although the participants had high oral care scores for postoperative patients with oral cancer, there was great diversity in the practice. The lack of oral care knowledge was deemed the main barrier in delivering quality oral care, and the educational need was stated by almost all participants. We suggest that a standard protocol or clinical practice guidelines for oral care for postoperative patients with oral cancer should be developed, and nurses should be educated to equip them with professional knowledge and skills.
Background: Structural changes in oral cavity, surgical incision, endotracheal intubation and other factors lead to divergence in oral care between patients after oral surgery and ordinary inpatients. High-quality oral care can reduce the incidence of incision infection and ventilator associated pneumonia. However, there is a lack of guidelines or expert consensus on oral care after oral cancer surgery . The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess ICU nurses’ practicing situation of oral care for postoperative patients with oral cancer and their need for training.Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study design was conducted in 19 intensive care units of 11 tertiary hospitals from Henan province in China. Data was collected from 173 nurses and 19 head nurses online using a structured questionnaire. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallies H tests were performed to analyze the data using SPSS (Version 25.0). Results: There were 7 (36.8%) ICUs and 8 (42.1%) ICUs formulating standard regulations on evaluation and procedure of oral care for postoperative patients with oral cancer respectively. A total of 173 nurses completed the questionnaire, and the median number of score was 75 (68, 78). Almost all nurses (91.2%) assessed patients’ oral hygiene at fixed time, while 52.0% and 28.3% of nurses depended on patient’s situation to conduct the first oral care and decide the frequency of oral care after surgery. More than half of the nurses (55.5%) spent about 5~10 min to conduct oral care for patients. Physiological saline solution (82.7%), swabbing (91.9%) and oral care package with cotton ball (86.1%) were the most popular oral care mouthwash, method and tool respectively. Nurses sought help from senior nurses (87.3%) and doctors (83.8%) mostly to solve difficulties of oral care, and 76.9% of nurses believed that the lack of knowledge and skills of oral care was the main barrier for nurses to implement oral care. Majority of participants (69.4%) have never received continuing education or training in oral care for postoperative patients with oral cancer and almost all (98.8%) of the respondents wanted standardized oral care skills. They thought that indications and contraindications (84.4%), the needed tools (81.5%) and mouthwash (80.9%) of oral care were the most eager to learn for ICU nurses. Approximately three quarters of nurses preferred scenario simulation practice as the training method.Conclusion: The participants had high scores in the oral care for the postoperative patients with oral cancer, nevertheless, there were great diversities in the practice. Lack of oral care knowledge was considered to be the main barrier in delivering quality oral care, and educational need was stated by almost all participants. We suggested that standard protocol or clinical practice guidelines of oral care for postoperative patients with oral cancer should be developed, and nurses should be educated with professional knowledge and skills.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.