Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) is implicated in multiple biological processes including metabolism, gene expression, cell fate determination, proliferation, and survival. GSK-3 activity is inhibited through phosphorylation of serine 21 in GSK-3␣ and serine 9 in GSK-3␤. These serine residues of GSK-3 have been previously identified as targets of protein kinase B (PKB͞Akt), a serine͞threonine kinase located downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Here, we show that serine 21 in GSK-3␣ and serine 9 in GSK-3␤ are also physiological substrates of cAMPdependent protein kinase A. Protein kinase A physically associates with, phosphorylates, and inactivates both isoforms of GSK-3. The results indicate that depending on the stimulatory context, the activity of GSK-3 can be modulated either by growth factors that work through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B cascade or by hormonal stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors that link to changes in intracellular cAMP levels.

SUMMARY Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) acts through high affinity G protein-coupled receptors to mediate a plethora of physiological and pathological activities associated with tumorigenesis. LPA receptors and autotaxin (ATX/LysoPLD), the primary enzyme producing LPA, are aberrantly expressed in multiple cancer lineages. However, the role of ATX and LPA receptors in the initiation and progression of breast cancer has not been evaluated. We demonstrate that expression of ATX or each Edg-family LPA receptor in mammary epithelium of transgenic mice is sufficient to induce a high frequency of late-onset, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, invasive and metastatic mammary cancer. Thus ATX and LPA receptors can contribute to the initiation and progression of breast cancer.

No abstract

Using differential display PCR, we have identified a gene [NOEY2, ARHI (designation by the Human Gene Nomenclature Committee)] with high homology to ras and rap that is expressed consistently in normal ovarian and breast epithelial cells but not in ovarian and breast cancers. Reexpression of NOEY2 through transfection suppresses clonogenic growth of breast and ovarian cancer cells. Growth suppression was associated with down-regulation of the cyclin D1 promoter activity and induction of p21 WAF1͞CIP1 . In an effort to identify mechanisms leading to NOEY2 silencing in cancer, we found that the gene is expressed monoallelically and is imprinted maternally. Loss of heterozygosity of the gene was detected in 41% of ovarian and breast cancers. In most of cancer samples with loss of heterozygosity, the nonimprinted functional allele was deleted. Thus, NOEY2 appears to be a putative imprinted tumor suppressor gene whose function is abrogated in ovarian and breast cancers.

We have investigated the effects of phospholipids on activation and proliferation of ovarian and breast cancer cells. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), lysophosphatidylserine (LPS) and sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC) all induce transient increases in cytosolic free Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) in both ovarian and breast cancer cell lines. The ability of LPA, LPS and SPC to induce increases in [Ca2+]i in ovarian and breast cancer cells is likely to be due to an interaction with cell-surface receptors as the increases in [Ca2+]i were: (1) due to release of calcium from intracellular stores and not from transmembrane uptake due to changes in permeability; (2) blocked by lanthanum and suramin which do not enter cells; (3) blocked by phorbol esters which interrupt increases in [Ca2+]i induced through a number of different receptors; and (4) not detected in freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, indicating cell type specificity. In addition, increases in [Ca2+]i induced by LPA, LPS and SPC in ovarian and breast cancer cells completely self-desensitized and cross-desensitized each other, but did not block increases in [Ca2+]i induced by thrombin. Lysophosphatidylglycerol (LPG), but not other lysophospholipids, inhibited LPA- but not LPS- or SPC-induced increases in [Ca2+]i, suggesting that LPA may interact with a different receptor(s) to LPS or SPC and that their downstream signalling pathways converge or interact. LPA, SPC and LPS also induced rapid increases in tyrosine phosphorylation of specific cellular proteins, including p125FAK. Strikingly, LPA, but not LPS or SPC, induced activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Despite an ability to activate similar intracellular signaling events, LPA, LPS and SPC exhibited markedly different effects on cell proliferation. Whereas LPA induced a significant increase in cell proliferation, LPS did not substantially alter cell proliferation and SPC inhibited cell proliferation. Surprisingly, phosphatidic acid (PA), which did not induce increases in [Ca2+]i, p125FAK activation or activation of MAP kinases, did induce proliferation of ovarian cancer cells, albeit at higher concentrations that LPA. The discordance between sensitivity to LPG, early biochemical events stimulated, and the eventual proliferation response combine to suggest that LPA probably utilizes a different receptor from LPS, SPC and PA. Therefore ovarian and breast cancer cells are sensitive to the effects of a number of different phospholipids which may play a role in the growth of these tumour cells in the cancer patient and are thus potential targets for therapy.

A potential role for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) in human oncogenesis was first suggested by the observation that LPA is present at elevated levels in ascites of ovarian cancer patients. In the current study, we demonstrated that LPA is a potent inducer of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 ( The LPA 2 receptor was identified to be the most efficient in linking LPA to IL-6 and IL-8 production although LPA 1 and LPA 3 were also capable of increasing the response to a certain degree. These studies elucidate the transcriptional mechanism and the Edg LPA receptors involved in LPA-induced IL-6 and IL-8 production and suggest potential strategies to restrain the expression of these cytokines in ovarian cancer.

The function of the pro-apoptotic molecule BAD is regulated by phosphorylation of two sites, serine-112 (Ser-112) and . Phosphorylation at either site results in loss of the ability of BAD to heterodimerize with the survival proteins BCL-X L or BCL-2. Phosphorylated BAD binds to 14-3-3 and is sequestered in the cytoplasm. It has been shown that phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-136 is mediated by the serine/threonine protein kinase Akt-1/PKB which is downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). The signaling process leading to phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-112 has not been identi®ed. In this study, we show that phosphorylation of the two serine residues of BAD is di erentially regulated. While Ser-136 phosphorylation is concordant with activation of Akt, Ser-112 phosphorylation does not correlate with Akt activation. Instead, we demonstrate that activated Ras and Raf, which are upstream of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), stimulate selective phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-112. Furthermore, phosphorylation of Ser-112, but not Ser-136 requires activation of the MAPK pathway as the MEK inhibitor, PD 98059, blocks EGF-, as well as activated Ras-or Raf-mediated phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-112. Therefore, the PI3K-Akt and Ras-MAPK pathways converge at BAD by mediating phosphorylation of distinct serine residues.

Cancer cells undergo metabolic reprogramming such as enhanced aerobic glycolysis, mutations in the tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes, and upregulation of de novo lipid synthesis and glutaminolysis. These alterations are pivotal to the development and maintenance of the malignant phenotype of cancer cells in unfavorable tumor microenvironment or metastatic sites. Although mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation (FAO) is a primary bioenergetic source, it has not been generally recognized as part of the metabolic landscape of cancer. The last few years, however, have seen a dramatic change in the view of cancer relevance of the FAO pathway. Many recent studies have provided significant evidence to support a "lipolytic phenotype" of cancer. FAO, like other well-defined metabolic pathways involved in cancer, is dysregulated in diverse human malignancies. Cancer cells rely on FAO for proliferation, survival, stemness, drug resistance, and metastatic progression. FAO is also reprogrammed in cancer-associated immune and other host cells, which may contribute to immune suppression and tumor-promoting microenvironment. This article reviews and puts into context our current understanding of multi-faceted roles of FAO in oncogenesis as well as anti-cancer therapeutic opportunities posed by the FAO pathway.