C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with progressive diabetic nephropathy in patients with type-2 diabetes (T2DN). However, role of CRP in T2DN remains unclear. We report here that CRP is pathogenic in T2DN in db/db mice that express human CRP (CRPtg-db/db). Compared to the littermate db/db mice, CRPtg-db/db developed more severe T2DN, showing higher levels of fasting blood glucose and microalbuminuria and more progressive renal inflammation and fibrosis. Enhanced T2DN in CRPtg-db/db mice were associated with over-activation of CRP-CD32b, NF-κB, TGF-β/Smad3, and mTOR signaling. Further studies in vitro defined that CRP activated Smad3 directly at 15 mins via the CD32b- ERK/p38 MAP kinase crosstalk pathway and indirectly at 24 hours through a TGF-β1-dependent mechanism. Importantly, CRP also activated mTOR signaling at 30 mins via a Smad3-dependent mechanism as Smad3 bound mTOR physically and CRP-induced mTOR signaling was abolished by a neutralizing CD32b antibody and a specific Smad3 inhibitor. Finally, we also found that CRP induced renal fibrosis through a CD32b-Smad3-mTOR pathway because blocking mTOR signaling with rapamycin inhibited CRP-induced CTGF and collagen I expression. Thus, CRP is pathogenic in T2DN. CRP may promote CD32b- NF-κB signaling to mediate renal inflammation; whereas, CRP may enhance renal fibrosis in T2DN via CD32b-Smad3-mTOR signaling.

Background: Supervised treadmill exercise is the recommended therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients with intermittent claudication (IC). However, most PAD patients do not exhibit typical symptoms of IC. The aim of the present study was to explore the efficacy and safety of intensive walking exercise in PAD patients with and without IC. Methods: The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of intensive walking exercise with usual care in patients with PAD were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: Eighteen trials with 1200 patients were eligible for the present analysis. Compared with usual care, intensive walking exercise significantly improved the maximal walking distance (MWD), pain-free walking distance, and the 6-min walking distance in patients with PAD (P < 0.00001 for all). Subgroup analyses indicated that a lesser improvement in MWD was observed in the subgroup with more diabetes patients, and that the subgroup with better baseline walking ability exhibited greater improvement in walking performance. In addition, similar improvements in walking performance were observed for exercise programs of different durations and modalities. No significant difference was found in adverse events between the intensive walking and usual care groups (relative risk 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.51, 1.39; P = 0.50). Conclusions: Regardless of exercise length and modality, regularly intensive walking exercise improves walking ability in PAD patients more than usual care. The presence of diabetes may attenuate the improvements in walking performance in patients with PAD following exercise.

Objective To compare the benefits and harms of drug treatments for adults with type 2 diabetes, adding non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (including finerenone) and tirzepatide (a dual glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) to previously existing treatment options. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central up to 14 October 2022. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Eligible randomised controlled trials compared drugs of interest in adults with type 2 diabetes. Eligible trials had a follow-up of 24 weeks or longer. Trials systematically comparing combinations of more than one drug treatment class with no drug, subgroup analyses of randomised controlled trials, and non-English language studies were deemed ineligible. Certainty of evidence was assessed following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) approach. Results The analysis identified 816 trials with 471 038 patients, together evaluating 13 different drug classes; all subsequent estimates refer to the comparison with standard treatments. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.94; high certainty) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.88, 0.82 to 0.93; high certainty) reduce all cause death; non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, so far tested only with finerenone in patients with chronic kidney disease, probably reduce mortality (0.89, 0.79 to 1.00; moderate certainty); other drugs may not. The study confirmed the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, admission to hospital for heart failure, and end stage kidney disease. Finerenone probably reduces admissions to hospital for heart failure and end stage kidney disease, and possibly cardiovascular death. Only GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce non-fatal stroke; SGLT-2 inhibitors are superior to other drugs in reducing end stage kidney disease. GLP-1 receptor agonists and probably SGLT-2 inhibitors and tirzepatide improve quality of life. Reported harms were largely specific to drug class (eg, genital infections with SGLT-2 inhibitors, severe gastrointestinal adverse events with tirzepatide and GLP-1 receptor agonists, hyperkalaemia leading to admission to hospital with finerenone). Tirzepatide probably results in the largest reduction in body weight (mean difference −8.57 kg; moderate certainty). Basal insulin (mean difference 2.15 kg; moderate certainty) and thiazolidinediones (mean difference 2.81 kg; moderate certainty) probably result in the largest increases in body weight. Absolute benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and finerenone vary in people with type 2 diabetes, depending on baseline risks for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes ( https://matchit.magicevidence.org/230125dist-diabetes ). Conclusions This network meta-analysis extends knowledge beyond confirming the substantial benefits with the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and death by adding information on finerenone and tirzepatide. These findings highlight the need for continuous assessment of scientific progress to introduce cutting edge updates in clinical practice guidelines for people with type 2 diabetes. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42022325948.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a novel family of glucose-lowering agents. Accumulating evidence suggests that DPP-4 inhibitors preserve pancreatic beta-cell function, but results in previous studies have been inconsistent. We assessed the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on the homoeostasis model assessment beta-cell function (HOMA-B) or insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index in patients with type 2 diabetes through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Relevant articles were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 27, 2016. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each included trial and pooled the data using a random-effects model. Fifty-two trials were included in the present analysis. Compared with placebo control, DPP-4 inhibitors as monotherapy significantly improved HOMA-B (WMD 9.15; 95% CI 7.48, 10.81). Similarly, DPP-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy in combination with other drugs showed significant improvement in HOMA-B (WMD 9.04; 95% CI 5.72, 12.37). However, we found no significant improvement in HOMA-IR following treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors as mono-therapy or as add-on therapy. In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibitors as monotherapy or as add-on therapy significantly improved beta-cell function but had no significant effect on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes.

No abstract

No abstract

This meta-analysis indicates ACEI/ARBs may be prescribed to RTRs with GFR and hemoglobin being carefully monitored.

Objective There is a lack of Toll interacting protein (TOLLIP) histological data in the lung tissue of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). We aim to demonstrate the features of TOLLIP expression in the lung tissue of CTD-ILD patients and to associate TOLLIP expression with polymorphisms and clinical characteristics. Methods Sixteen patients diagnosed with CTD-ILD who underwent lung transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) at our institution between 2015 and 2021 were recruited. TOLLIP was localized in lung TBCB specimens. Rs3750920 was genotyped. Clinical characteristics, CT and pathological scores, and follow-up data were recorded. Results TOLLIP expressed in both alveolar and bronchiolar epithelial cells in patients with CTD-ILD. TOLLIP expression significantly increased in fibrotic areas. The distribution of rs3750920 was C/C: 43.7%, C/T:56.3%, T/T: 0%. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between C/C and C/T groups. The average follow-up time was 39.61 ± 16.78 months. During the follow-up, the change in G-score of chest thin-section CT (HRCT) was moderately negatively correlated with TOLLIP expression level in alveolar epithelial cells (r=-0.596, P = 0.024) and strongly negatively correlated with TOLLIP expression level in bronchiolar epithelial cells (r=-0.739, P = 0.004). Conclusions TOLLIP might play an important role in the regulation of pulmonary fibrosis in CTD-ILD. Patients with higher TOLLIP expression show greater improvement of ground glass opacity on HRCT, which implies TOLLIP expression is associated with prognosis. Further research is warranted to reveal the pathophysiologic mechanisms of TOLLIP in CTD, and identify potential therapeutic strategies to mitigate these diseases.