BackgroundThe objective of the study was to describe the baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and analyze its associated clinical and sociodemographic factors, assessing HRQOL through internet.MethodsThis was a descriptive study of 136 patients with T1DM from 5 hospitals in Catalonia, Spain (72 girls, mean age 13.4 years (range 8–19). Inclusion criteria were more than 6 months from diagnosis, more than 8 years old and without cognitive problems. Sociodemographic (age, sex, family level of education, type of family and origin) and clinical variables (type of insulin therapy, duration of disease, adherence to treatment, body mass index and HbA1c) were collected. HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-Y) and KIDSCREEN, collected via web. Mental health status was assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Multiple linear regression models were adjusted.ResultsPhysical-well-being mean scores were lower (worse) than the European average (<50) and especially in girls, older children (>11 years old), those from single-parent families, and those with low adherence. Older children and patients with poor metabolic control (HbA1c >7,5% [58 mmol/mol]) showed worse scores in the KIDSCREEN-10 index. Similar results were observed with the EQ-5D-Y. Multivariate models showed that age, single-parent families, adherence and mental health were the most influential factors.ConclusionsDiabetic patients report similar HRQOL than the population of the same age with slightly worse physical well-being. The study shows some factors to be taken into account to improve HRQOL, and also the feasibility of using web to collect information in clinical practice.
Routine assessment and face-to-face patient-physician discussion of HRQOL results improved HRQOL scores after a year of follow-up, especially in Psychological well-being and school environment. The results support the routinary use of HRQOL assessment in clinical practice.
The satellite scheduling and its version of ground station scheduling are increasingly attracting the attention of researchers from aerospace and optimization domain. While in the recent past satellite mission arise from large aero-spacial agencies, nowadays even smaller companies are interested in satellite missions for basic tasks such as telemetry, imaging, remote sensing, etc. The ground station scheduling problem consists in computing an optimal planning of communications between satellites or spacecraft (SC) and operations teams of Ground Station (GS). The problem is highly complex and multi-objective and in its general formulation has been shown NP-hard. Therefore, its resolution is tackled by heuristic and meta-heuristic methods. Although heuristic and meta-heuristic methods are well understood, their evaluation for specific problems, like ground station scheduling, remain a challenge. The design and development of benchmarks of instances is thus needful to evaluate such methods and also to provide the community with means to reproduce the experimental study for the same benchmark under the same or different parameter setting. In this paper, we present an XML-based benchmark of instances for the ground station scheduling generated with the STK simulation toolkit. Then we show the experimental evaluation of a Basic Genetic Algorithm using the benchmark.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.