In the "placebo" control condition for paired preference testing, "identical" stimuli are presented to consumers to determine the frequency of preference and "no preference" responses induced by the hidden demand characteristics of the testing condition. As a control for bias, induced by such hidden demand characteristics, these frequencies can be compared with the actual preference frequencies of the nonidentical test stimuli to be assessed for preference. It was hypothesized that the introduction of graded preference response options might reduce the frequency of "no preference" responses in the placebo condition. Using identical yogurt stimuli with related-sample (single-group) and independent-sample (multigroup) designs, this hypothesis was not confirmed. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONSThe "placebo" condition in paired preference testing provides a way to control the tendency of consumers to give false preference. The statistical analysis can be improved by finding a protocol that maximizes the proportion of "no preference" responses in the placebo condition. This can be done by 3 Corresponding
An unspecified number of consumers who used a 9‐point hedonic scale were frustrated because they could not express preferences for products with the same ratings. Accordingly, consumers were required to rate samples of yogurt on a 9‐point structured hedonic scale. Consumers were able to express preference judgments because the testing was performed one‐on‐one with the experimenter. Thus, it was possible to determine the proportion of consumers who had given the same hedonic response to yogurts but still had preferences for one or other of the stimuli. Further testing, which included a pair of identical yogurts among the stimuli, allowed the proportion of preference and no preference responses elicited by identical stimuli to be determined in this context. Such data are useful as a control condition in preference testing, to assess the proportion of false preferences induced by the experimental conditions. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Consumer liking for various products is typically measured using the 9‐point structured hedonic scale. Sometimes, consumers will give the same score to two products yet prefer one to the other. Such preferences are not recorded if the consumer is isolated from the experimenter and has no means of reporting them. However, the situation is easily rectified if the experimenter interacts one‐on‐one with the consumer. Sometimes, false preferences can be obtained from a hedonic scale. This tendency can be monitored by including identical stimuli in the measurements. The present study investigated the extent of such problems so that methods could be devised to address the problem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.