Summary -In order to check the reliability of micrometeorological and chamber methods for the measurement of N 2 O fluxes at the 'soil-atmosphere' interface, an experiment using these two methodologies was performed in autumn on a bare soil fertilized with 150 kg N-NH 4 NO 3 ha -1 . Micrometeorological measurements were continuously taken using either the gradient or eddy correlation methods, the N 2 O gas mixing ratio being measured with a tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer. N 2 O emission fluxes were also monitored in two automatic chambers during two 3-h periods every day, ie, around midday and midnight, whereas 16 manual chambers were monitored only around midday. Areas over which the fluxes were measured ranged from 0.18 and 0.49 m 2 for the manual and automatic chambers, respectively, to more than 10 4 m 2 for the micrometeorological methods. Additional soil variables were obtained, including the soil bulk density profile, water content, temperature and N-NO 3 -and N-NH 4 + concentrations. The different methods provided similar estimates of N 2 O fluxes with an average over the whole of the common measurement period of around 6 ng N-N 2 O m -2 s -1 . The 16 manual chambers showed coefficients of variation comprised between 30 and 150 % during the 2 weeks of common observations. This variability may explain the unusual shape of the N 2 O concentration gradient in the atmosphere observed sometimes, which led to the conclusion that the gradient data set contained information allowing the spatial variability in N 2 O emission to be characterized. Hourly micrometeorological fluxes indicated a temporal variability of about 100 % over daily periods. Microbial
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.