Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is a major and highly prevalent health problem. Given the high number of papers available, clinicians might be overwhelmed by the evidence on CLBP management. Taking into account the scale and costs of CLBP, it is imperative that healthcare professionals have access to up-to-date, evidence-based information to assist them in treatment decision-making. Therefore, this paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence non-invasive rehabilitation for CLBP. Taking together up-to-date evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analysis and available treatment guidelines, most physically inactive therapies should not be considered for CLBP management, except for pain neuroscience education and spinal manipulative therapy if combined with exercise therapy, with or without psychological therapy. Regarding active therapy, back schools, sensory discrimination training, proprioceptive exercises, and sling exercises should not be considered due to low-quality and/or conflicting evidence. Exercise interventions on the other hand are recommended, but while all exercise modalities appear effective compared to minimal/passive/conservative/no intervention, there is no evidence that some specific types of exercises are superior to others. Therefore, we recommend choosing exercises in line with the patient’s preferences and abilities. When exercise interventions are combined with a psychological component, effects are better and maintain longer over time.

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motivational interviewing (MI) have been widely implemented and tested in the field of chronic pain management, and both strategies have been shown to be effective in the short term (small effect sizes) for the management of chronic pain. PNE uses contemporary pain science to educate patients about the biopsychosocial nature of the chronicity of their pain experience. The goal of PNE is to optimize patients’ pain beliefs/perceptions to facilitate the acquisition of adaptive pain–coping strategies. MI, on the other hand, is a patient-centered communication style for eliciting and enhancing motivation for behavior change by shifting the patient away from a state of indecision or uncertainty. Conceptually, PNE and MI appear to be complementary interventions, with complementary rather than overlapping effects; MI primarily improves cognitive and behavioral awareness and, potentially, adherence to treatment principles, whereas PNE potentially increases pain knowledge/beliefs, awareness, and willingness to explore psychological factors that are potentially associated with pain. Therefore, combining PNE with MI might lead to improved outcomes with larger and longer-lasting effect sizes. The combined use of PNE and MI in patients having chronic pain is introduced here, along with a description of how clinicians might be able to integrate PNE and MI in the treatment of patients experiencing chronic pain. Clinical trials are needed to examine whether combining PNE with MI is superior to PNE or MI alone for improving pain and quality of life in patients having chronic pain.

Background Pain neuroscience education (PNE) combined with cognition-targeted exercises is an effective treatment for people with chronic spinal pain (CSP). However, it is unclear as to why some patients benefit more from this treatment. We expect that patients with more pronounced maladaptive pain cognitions, such as kinesiophobia, might show poorer treatment responses. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the influence of baseline kinesiophobia levels on the treatment outcomes of PNE combined with cognition-targeted exercises in people with CSP. This study was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Methods Outcome measures included a numeric rating scale for pain (NRS), the Pain Disability Index (PDI), quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey [SF-36]), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ). Regression models were built using treatment (PNE plus cognition-targeted exercises or neck/back school plus general exercises), baseline scores on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and time (in months) as independent variables. Results A significant three-way interaction effect was found for the models of PDI, PCS, PVAQ, and the SF-36 mental domain, with estimates of −0.01, −0.01, −0.01, and 0.07, respectively. A significant effect of baseline TSK scores was found for the physical domain of the SF-36 (estimate = −3.16). For the NRS, no significant effect of baseline TSK scores was found. Conclusions Our findings indicate that PNE plus cognition-targeted exercises can successfully decrease the unfavorable influence of pretreatment kinesiophobia on disability, mental health, pain catastrophizing, and hypervigilance over time in people with CSP. Nevertheless, higher scores in pretreatment kinesiophobia might still be a key factor for the lack of improvement in pain catastrophizing and hypervigilance following treatment. Regardless of the followed treatment program, pretreatment kinesiophobia was also shown to significantly influence physical health in people with CSP. Impact This study provides novel insight into the unfavorable influence of kinesiophobia on treatment outcomes in people with CSP, and how PNE plus cognition-targeted exercises can limit this impact. As this is one of the first studies to research possible predictors of this experimental treatment, its findings motivate further exploration of other possible influencing factors for treatment success of PNE plus cognition-targeted exercises.

Objective The present cross-sectional study aims to unravel associations between pain intensity and cognitions versus quantitative sensory testing in people scheduled for surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Additionally, insight will be provided in the presence of dysfunctional nociceptive processing and maladaptive pain cognitions in this population. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Data from three hospitals in Belgium. Subjects The final sample comprised 120 participants with lumbar radiculopathy scheduled for surgery, included between March 2016 and April 2019. Methods Self-reported pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue scale and pain cognitions were assessed using self-reported questionnaires (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire). Quantitative sensory testing (detection thresholds, pain thresholds, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation) was evaluated as well. Results Evidence was found for the presence of an impaired inhibitory response to nociceptive stimuli and maladaptive pain cognitions in this population. Kinesiophobia was found to be present to a maladaptive degree in the majority of the patients (n = 106 (88%)). Significant, but weak, associations between electrical pain thresholds at the Sural nerves and leg pain intensity (Sural nerve symptomatic side: r=-0.23; p = 0.01; non-symptomatic side: r=-0.22; p = 0.02) and kinesiophobia levels (Sural nerve non-symptomatic side: r=-0.26; p = 0.006) were identified. Conclusions Electrical detection thresholds and correlates for endogenous nociceptive facilitation and inhibition were not found to be related with any of the pain cognitions, nor with pain intensity in people scheduled to undergo surgery for lumbar radiculopathy.

with details of the nature of the infringement. We will investigate the claim and if justified, we will take the appropriate steps.

(1) Background: Dysregulation in serotonergic and noradrenergic systems may be implicated in the neurobiophysiological mechanisms underlying pain-related cognitive impairment in chronic whiplash-associated disorders (CWAD). This study aimed to unravel the role of serotonergic and noradrenergic descending pathways in cognitive functioning at rest and in response to exercise in people with CWAD. (2) Methods: 25 people with CWAD were included in this double-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study. Endogenous descending serotonergic and noradrenergic inhibitory mechanisms were modulated by using a single dose of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (Citalopram) or a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (Atomoxetine). Cognitive performance was studied at rest and in response to exercise (1) without medication intake; (2) after intake of Citalopram; and (3) after intake of Atomoxetine. (3) Results: After Atomoxetine intake, selective attention improved compared with the no medication day (p < 0.05). In contrast, a single dose of Citalopram had no significant effect on cognitive functioning at rest. When performing pairwise comparisons, improvements in selective attention were found after exercise for the no medication condition (p < 0.05). In contrast, after intake of Citalopram or Atomoxetine, selective and sustained attention worsened after exercise. (4) Conclusions: A single dose of Atomoxetine improved selective attention only in one Stroop condition, and a single dose of Citalopram had no effect on cognitive functioning at rest in people with CWAD. Only without medication intake did selective attention improve in response to exercise, whereas both centrally acting medications worsened cognitive performance in response to a submaximal aerobic exercise bout in people with CWAD.

No abstract

This cross-sectional study explored associations between demographics, pain intensity and cognitions on the one hand and healthcare use (HCU) on the other hand in people undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. HCU during the 2 months preceding surgery was evaluated using a retrospective questionnaire. Demographics included sex, age and level of education and equivalent income. Back and leg pain intensity were evaluated using a visual analogue scale. Pain cognitions were assessed with the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia, the pain catastrophizing scale and the pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire. The sample comprised 120 participants (52% males; 49 years (Quartile (Q)1–Q3: 37.3–57.43)). The number of visits to the general practitioner was associated with sex (incidence rate ratio (IRR) for males = 0.811; p = 0.050), pain catastrophizing (IRR = 1.010; p = 0.041), pain magnification (IRR = 1.058; p = 0.004) and leg pain intensity (IRR = 1.004; p = 0.038). The number of neurosurgeon visits was associated with level of education (IRR moderate education = 1.518; p = 0.016 (reference: low education)). Receiving zero physiotherapy visits was associated with higher back pain intensity (Beta = 0.018; p = 0.028). Highest level of analgesics used was associated with sex (IRR for males = 0.502; p = 0.047) and leg pain (IRR = 1.014; p = 0.034). Only the association between general practitioner visits and pain magnification remained significant in multivariable analyses (IRR = 1.061; p = 0.033). The results suggest a rather indirect relationship between HCU and demographics, pain intensity and cognitions, involving a potential interplay between several patient- and healthcare system-related factors.