GP ablation during thoracoscopic surgery for advanced AF has no detectable effect on AF recurrence but causes more major adverse events, major bleeding, sinus node dysfunction, and pacemaker implantation. (Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Autonomic Modulation via Thoracoscopic Surgery [AFACT]; NCT01091389).
Background— Atrial fibrosis is an important component of the arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We studied the effect of interstitial fibrosis on conduction velocity (CV) in the left atrial appendage of patients with AF. Methods and Results— Thirty-five left atrial appendages were obtained during AF surgery. Preparations were superfused and stimulated at 100 beats per minute. Activation was recorded with optical mapping. Longitudinal CV (CV L ), transverse CV (CV T ), and activation times (>2 mm distance) were measured. Interstitial collagen was quantified and graded qualitatively. The presence of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts was assessed immunohistochemically. Mean CV L was 0.55±0.22 m/s, mean CV T was 0.25±0.15 m/s, and the mean activation time was 9.31±5.45 ms. The amount of fibrosis was unrelated to CV or patient characteristics. CV L was higher in left atrial appendages with thick compared with thin interstitial collagen strands (0.77±0.22 versus 0.48±0.19 m/s; P =0.012), which were more frequently present in persistent patients with AF. CV T was not significantly different ( P =0.47), but activation time was 14.93±4.12 versus 7.95±4.12 ms in patients with thick versus thin interstitial collagen strands, respectively ( P =0.004). Fibroblasts were abundantly present and were associated with the presence of thick interstitial collagen strands ( P =0.008). Myofibroblasts were not detected in the left atrial appendage. Conclusions— In patients with AF, thick interstitial collagen strands are associated with higher CV L and increased activation time. Our observations demonstrate that the severity and structure of local interstitial fibrosis is associated with atrial conduction abnormalities, presenting an arrhythmogenic substrate for atrial re-entry.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is associated with pronounced morbidity and mortality. Its prevalence, expected to further increase for the forthcoming years, and associated frequent hospitalizations turn AF into a major health problem. Structural and electrical atrial remodelling underlie the substrate for AF, but the exact mechanisms driving this remodelling remain incompletely understood. Recent studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNA), short non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression, may be involved in the pathophysiology of AF. MiRNAs have been implicated in AF-induced ion channel remodelling and fibrosis. MiRNAs could therefore provide insight into AF pathophysiology or become novel targets for therapy with miRNA mimics or anti-miRNAs. Moreover, circulating miRNAs have been suggested as a new class of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of AF. However, the origin and function of miRNAs in tissue and plasma frequently remain unknown and studies investigating the role of miRNAs in AF vary in design and focus and even present contradicting results. Here, we provide a systematic review of the available clinical and functional studies investigating the tissue and plasma miRNAs in AF and will thereafter discuss the potential of miRNAs as biomarkers or novel therapeutic targets in AF.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10557-017-6736-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
MRAs significantly reduce new-onset AF and recurrent AF, but not POAF. MRA treatment can be considered an additive therapeutic strategy in AF.
Background: Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with higher stroke and mortality risk than paroxysmal AF (pAF). Outcomes of catheter or surgical ablation are worse in patients with persistent AF than in pAF, and the optimal invasive rhythm control strategy has not been established. Purpose: We provide a contemporary systematic overview on efficacy and safety of catheter and minimallyinvasive surgical ablation for persistent AF. Methods: We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL from inception to July 2018 for randomized trials on surgical and catheter ablation, and included all study arms on persistent AF. Outcome was AF freedom after ≥12 months follow-up without AAD use. Random effects models were used to calculate proportions with 95%-confidence intervals. Safety consisted of adverse events during treatment and follow-up. Results: We included 6 studies on minimally-invasive surgical ablation and 56 on catheter ablation, involving 7624 patients with persistent AF. AF Freedom at 12 months was 69% (95%CI 64-74%) after surgical and 51% (95%CI 46-56%) after catheter ablation. More severe procedural adverse events occurred with surgery than with catheter ablation. Conclusions: In persistent AF patients, minimally-invasive surgical ablation is associated with more procedural complications, but higher AF freedom. As adverse events after surgical ablation appear more severe than in catheter ablation, a patient-tailored therapy choice is warranted.
Intensive blood pressure lowering may have a similar favorable effect and appears to decrease cardiovascular events in both patients with and patients without T2DM.
BackgroundAcetylcholine (ACh) shortens action potential duration (APD) in human atria. APD shortening facilitates atrial fibrillation (AF) by reducing the wavelength for reentry. However, the influence of ACh on electrical conduction in human atria and its contribution to AF are unclear, particularly when combined with impaired conduction from interstitial fibrosis.ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of ACh on human atrial conduction and its role in AF with computational, experimental, and clinical approaches.MethodsS1S2 pacing (S1 = 600 ms and S2 = variable cycle lengths) was applied to the following human AF computer models: a left atrial appendage (LAA) myocyte to quantify the effects of ACh on APD, maximum upstroke velocity (Vmax), and resting membrane potential (RMP); a monolayer of LAA myocytes to quantify the effects of ACh on conduction; and 3) an intact left atrium (LA) to determine the effects of ACh on arrhythmogenicity. Heterogeneous ACh and interstitial fibrosis were applied to the monolayer and LA models. To corroborate the simulations, APD and RMP from isolated human atrial myocytes were recorded before and after 0.1 μM ACh. At the tissue level, LAAs from AF patients were optically mapped ex vivo using Di-4-ANEPPS. The difference in total activation time (AT) was determined between AT initially recorded with S1 pacing, and AT recorded during subsequent S1 pacing without (n = 6) or with (n = 7) 100 μM ACh.ResultsIn LAA myocyte simulations, S1 pacing with 0.1 μM ACh shortened APD by 41 ms, hyperpolarized RMP by 7 mV, and increased Vmax by 27 mV/ms. In human atrial myocytes, 0.1 μM ACh shortened APD by 48 ms, hyperpolarized RMP by 3 mV, and increased Vmax by 6 mV/ms. In LAA monolayer simulations, S1 pacing with ACh hyperpolarized RMP to delay total AT by 32 ms without and 35 ms with fibrosis. This led to unidirectional conduction block and sustained reentry in fibrotic LA with heterogeneous ACh during S2 pacing. In AF patient LAAs, S1 pacing with ACh increased total AT from 39.3 ± 26 ms to 71.4 ± 31.2 ms (p = 0.036) compared to no change without ACh (56.7 ± 29.3 ms to 50.0 ± 21.9 ms, p = 0.140).ConclusionIn fibrotic atria with heterogeneous parasympathetic activation, ACh facilitates AF by shortening APD and slowing conduction to promote unidirectional conduction block and reentry.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01206062 and NCT00000620.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.