In this article, the authors assess the use of gaming/simulation for research purposes within the organization and policy sciences. They describe three categories of research: (a) gaming/simulation for pure research, (b) gaming/simulation for policy development, and (c) gaming/simulation for policy implementation and organizational change. For each category, an example project is described. Studying six projects and interviewing experts on these projects, they draw lessons for each category. At the end of the article, they conclude with eight methodological characteristics of gaming for empirical-analytical study of policy and organization projects.
The authors describe why and how different types of simulations can be used to understand and support the challenges of utility deregulation. They present an overview of liberalization and deregulation efforts in three utility markets-electricity, natural gas, and drinking water-and describe the main challenges and opportunities for regulators and business managers. A general classification of seven different types of simulation is presented, including market simulations, policy simulations, dynamic business simulations, capability simulations, day-in-a-life simulations, performance simulations, and gaming simulations. The authors reflect on the role of these simulations for utility deregulation and give examples.About a decade ago, electricity, natural gas, and water were produced and distributed by public monopolies in many countries around the world (e.g., in the new EU member states, this is still the case). However, since the late 1980s, a market view has pervaded our thinking about public utilities and has had far-reaching consequences on how utilities are owned, managed, operated, and deregulated. Since then, governments in Europe and the United States have steadily implemented guidelines and reforms aiming to rationalize the "historically grown, but inefficient structures" of public ownership and regional monopolies. By and large, these reforms are characterized as liberalization (i.e., from monopolies to open markets), as privatization (i.e., from public to private ownership), as deregulation (i.e., lowering legal and formal barriers to competition), and as reregulation (i.e., the implementation of regulatory regimes that can safeguard public values and create a level playing field; see
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.