Summary 20-40% of cancer patients show emotional distress. Psychosocial support should be offered to severely distressed patients. However, little is known about the selection of patients to whom such support should be offered. This study investigated oncologists' ability to identify such patients. In a consecutive series of 298 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, distress, perceived social support and desire for supportive counselling were assessed using screening instruments. Simultaneously, 8 oncologists estimated patient distress and need for psychosocial support. A complete set of data was obtained in 80.2% of cases. Concordance of the oncologists' estimation of patient distress and perceived social support with the results of the screening instruments was weak (κ = 0.10 and κ = 0.05). Oncologists recognized the presence of severe distress only in 11 of the 30 severely distressed patients. Correct perception of distress was lower in patients with head and neck cancer and lung cancer and in lower class patients. Oncologists' recommendations for supportive counselling did not correlate with patient distress or the amount of perceived support but rather with progressive disease and less denial behaviour. Our results underline the need for educating oncologists in order to improve their ability to identify patient distress.

BACKGROUND Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is often used by cancer patients. Data on characteristics of users, concomitant psychologic disturbance, and compliance with standard treatment continue to be controversial. Use of and interest in CAM and their correlation with psychologic disturbance, ways of coping with illness, and compliance with standard treatment were examined in this study. METHODS The authors conducted a survey in a consecutive sample of 205 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, using a structured questionnaire to record use of and interest in CAM, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Hornheide Questionnaire to assess patient distress and social support, and the Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness. RESULTS Of the 172 participants, 24.4% (response rate, 83.9%) reported use of CAM, and 31.4% reported not having used but being interested in such methods. Logistic regression analysis including clinical, demographic, and psychologic characteristics as independent variables yielded 3 predictors of use of or interest in CAM: younger age (P = 0.004; odds ratio (OR), 0.96), progressive cancer (P = 0.064; OR, 1.47), and active coping behavior (P = 0.016; OR, 1.65). Patients interested in or using CAM did not show more psychologic disturbance, poorer social support, or less trust in medicine or compliance with radiotherapy than subjects without such interest. CONCLUSIONS Use of CAM by cancer patients is not associated with perceived distress or poor compliance with medical treatment but with active coping behavior. Patients seem to consider CAM as supplementary to standard medical methods and one way of avoiding passivity and of coping with feelings of hopelessness. Cancer 2000;89:873–80. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

No abstract

We asked 78 chronic low back pain patients to report on their usual pain intensity, and on the lifestyle changes caused by their pain, on a horizontally-oriented visual analogue scale (VAS). Also, the usual and the current pain intensities were examined on a vertical VAS. Statistical analysis showed normal distribution of data in the measurement of usual pain on the horizontal VAS, but no homogeneous distribution on the vertical VAS. Therefore, in the measurement of chronic low back pain VAS should be used horizontally rather than vertically, because of higher sensitivity. The intensity of usual pain was significantly correlated with the degree of lifestyle change. No correlation was found between current and usual pain. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the vertical and horizontal VAS. Also, there was no reduction of the failure rate by giving additional oral explanations in the use of the scale to the patient. Owing to a negative influence in distribution of rates and an increase in the failure rate, complex questions should be avoided. A short written introduction to the scale is sufficient, and oral explanations are not essential.

In a consecutive sample of 100 breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, cancer-related distress was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and patients' interest in and acceptance of psychosocial support with the Questionnaire for Psychosocial Support and the European Consultation Liaison Workgroup documentation form. 31% of the patients suffered moderate to severe anxiety and/or depression and 42% expressed interest in supportive counselling. The wish for psychosocial support did not correlate with distress (moderate or severe anxiety and/or depression; Kappa = 0.06; P = 0.560). Patients with elevated levels of distress and/or those expressing a wish for psychosocial support were offered counselling by a psychotherapist and a social worker within the framework of a liaison service; 69% of the 58 patients offered such support accepted it. We conclude that screening instruments are helpful in identifying and consequently offering support to patients in need of counselling.

In a first cross-validation with 108 patients, some rather high correlations were found between the SCL-90-R and the ISR. They ranged from r = 0.78 to 0.37 for the individual syndrome scales, and amounted to r = 0.78 for the GSI versus the total score.

No abstract

No abstract