Introduction Etoposide is critical in treating pediatric cancers, although hypersensitivity can be severe and treatment-limiting. Reported rates of hypersensitivity range from 2% to 51%. Hypersensitivity data for etoposide phosphate, a newer product, are lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess etoposide and etoposide phosphate hypersensitivity incidence. Secondary objectives included evaluation of potential risk factors for hypersensitivity and strategies to prevent recurrence. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated pediatric patients who received initial etoposide phosphate or etoposide dose between August 2012 and July 2017. The primary outcome was documentation of hypersensitivity within four months of initial dose. Potential risk factors evaluated included age, allergies, dose, infusion rate, infusion concentration, and premedication. Results Of 246 patients, hypersensitivity reactions occurred in five of 54 patients (9.3%) who received etoposide phosphate and 52 of 192 patients (27.1%) who received etoposide ( p = 0.0061). For etoposide, the mean initial infusion rate was 64.6 ± 40.9 mg/m2/h for patients with hypersensitivity and 49.5 ± 33.4 mg/m2/h without hypersensitivity ( p = 0.0886). Etoposide phosphate rate was not associated with hypersensitivity. Recurrent hypersensitivity occurred in one of nine patients (11.1%) who received etoposide desensitization and one of 38 patients (2.6%) who changed formulation to etoposide phosphate. Conclusions Etoposide was associated with more hypersensitivity than etoposide phosphate in pediatric patients. Etoposide hypersensitivity was associated with higher infusion rates, but not etoposide phosphate. Differences in hypersensitivity incidence and infusion rate influence indicate a formulation-effect. Etoposide hypersensitivity recurrence may be prevented by changing to etoposide phosphate formulation. During etoposide phosphate shortages, etoposide desensitization may prevent recurrent hypersensitivity.
OBJECTIVESChildren have decreased levels of antithrombin III (AT III) compared to adults. These levels may be further decreased during acute illness. Administration of exogenous AT III can increase anticoagulant efficacy. The objective of this study was to evaluate AT III doses rounded to available vial sizes compared to partial vial doses in critically ill pediatric patients, including patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).METHOD This retrospective review evaluated pediatric patients 0-18 years of age admitted to a 24-bed medical/surgical pediatric intensive care unit between June 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014, who received plasma-derived AT III. Patients received unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or no anticoagulation. This review included patients who received ECMO and CRRT.RESULTS Eighty doses of AT III were administered to 24 patients (38 full vial size doses and 42 partial vial size doses). The AT III level following dose administration was ≥80% for 26 full vial doses (70%) and 16 partial vial doses (41%; p = 0.010). For patients who received multiple doses of AT III, the median time between doses was 45 hours following full vial doses, and 23 hours following partial vial doses (p = 0.011). Seven patients (29%) had documentation of new or increased bleeding. The median waste prevented from rounding doses to full vial sizes was 363 units.CONCLUSIONS After receiving AT III doses rounded to full vial sizes, patients were more likely to have a therapeutic AT III level and a longer interval between administrations. Rounding AT III doses to full vial sizes reduces waste and can result in cost savings.
Etoposide administration can be complicated by hypersensitivity reactions. Desensitization may provide a strategy to prevent hypersensitivity recurrence. One challenge with desensitization is regimen complexity. This case series describes 12 pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients who received a simplified six-step etoposide desensitization protocol. This protocol contains 50% fewer titration steps compared with previously described protocols and eliminates infusion rate changes during titration. Simplified titration may minimize risk of error during administration and improve safety. This protocol was tolerated by 92% of patients. Given increasing frequency and duration of drug shortages, a simplified desensitization protocol provides a valuable treatment option.
Implementation of an initiative with defined workflow, multidisciplinary collaboration, and early case management efforts to obtain insurance authorization increased outpatient administration of first palivizumab doses. Patient adherence improved as demonstrated by more timely receipt of the second palivizumab dose. There was no difference in reimbursement; however, acquisition cost decreased which is valuable considering low reimbursement rates. RSV-positive readmissions did not change significantly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.