Background: The aim of electroencephalogram (EEG) source localization is to find the brain areas responsible for EEG waves of interest. It consists of solving forward and inverse problems. The forward problem is solved by starting from a given electrical source and calculating the potentials at the electrodes. These evaluations are necessary to solve the inverse problem which is defined as finding brain sources which are responsible for the measured potentials at the EEG electrodes.
The electroencephalogram (EEG) is often contaminated by muscle artifacts. In this paper, a new method for muscle artifact removal in EEG is presented, based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) as a blind source separation (BSS) technique. This method is demonstrated on a synthetic data set. The method outperformed a low-pass filter with different cutoff frequencies and an independent component analysis (ICA)-based technique for muscle artifact removal. In addition, the method is applied on a real ictal EEG recording contaminated with muscle artifacts. The proposed method removed successfully the muscle artifact without altering the recorded underlying ictal activity.
Summary:Purpose: To investigate the potential clinical relevance of a new algorithm to remove muscle artifacts in ictal scalp EEG.Methods: Thirty-seven patients with refractory partial epilepsy with a well-defined seizure onset zone based on full presurgical evaluation, including SISCOM but excluding ictal EEG findings, were included. One ictal EEG of each patient was presented to a clinical neurophysiologist who was blinded to all other data. Ictal EEGs were first rated after bandpass filtering, then after elimination of muscle artifacts using a blind source separation-canonical correlation analysis technique (BSS-CCA). Degree of muscle artifact contamination, lateralization, localization, time and pattern of ictal EEG onset were compared between the two readings and validated against the other localizing information.Results: Muscle artifacts contaminated 97% of ictal EEGs, and interfered with the interpretation in 76%, more often in extratemporal than temporal lobe seizures. BSS-CCA significantly improved the sensitivity to localize the seizure onset from 62% to 81%, and performed best in ictal EEGs with moderate to severe muscle artifact contamination. In a significant number of the contaminated EEGs, BSS-CCA also led to an earlier identification of ictal EEG changes, and recognition of ictal EEG patterns that were hidden by muscle artifact.Conclusions: Muscle artifacts interfered with the interpretation in a majority of ictal EEGs. BSS-CCA reliably removed these muscle artifacts in a user-friendly manner. BSS-CCA may have an important place in the interpretation of ictal EEGs during presurgical evaluation of patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Key Words: Epilepsy-Muscle artifact-Ictal EEGBlind source separation-Canonical correlation analysis.The electroencephalogram (EEG) is frequently contaminated by electrophysiological potentials generated by muscle activity, and these electromyogram (EMG) artifacts often interfere with the interpretation of the EEG (Lopes da Silva, 2005). Ictal EMG artifact on EEG due to movement during a seizure may be problematic in the setting of the preoperative evaluation of patients with refractory seizures, since ictal recordings are crucial for the localization of the seizure onset zone. Ictal scalp EEG recordings that provide clear localizing information streamline the presurgical evaluation, often obviating the need for intracranial EEG.Ictal EEG recordings give localizing information in around 50-70% of cases, more often in temporal than extratemporal lobe epilepsy Walczak et al., 1992;Foldvary et al., 2001). Although muscle arti-
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.