Background: Postoperative blood product transfusions in elderly hip fracture patients cause concern for morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors and short-term sequelae of postoperative transfusion following geriatric hip fracture surgery. Methods: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) to identify geriatric (⩾65 years) patients who sustained operative femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric hip fractures in 2016. Multivariate regression was used to determine risk-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of associated perioperative risk factors and sequelae of postoperative transfusion. Results: In total, 8416 geriatric hip fracture patients were identified of whom 28.3% had documented postoperative transfusion. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.03 [1.02–1.04], p < 0.001), preoperative anaemia (OR 4.69 [3.99–5.52], p = 0.001), female sex (OR 1.61 [1.39–1.87], p < 0.001), lower BMI (OR 0.97 [0.96–0.98], p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (OR 1.14 [1.01–1.27], p = 0.031), COPD (OR 1.30 [1.06–1.59], p = 0.011), hypertension (OR 1.17 [1.01–1.35], p = 0.038), increased OR time (OR 1.02 [1.01–1.03], p < 0.001), and intertrochanteric (OR 2.99 [2.57–3.49], p < 0.001) and subtrochanteric femur fractures (OR 5.07 [3.84–6.69], p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for receiving postoperative blood transfusion. Patients with postoperative transfusion had a significantly higher risk-adjusted 30-day mortality (8.4% vs. 6.4%, OR 1.29 [1.02–1.64], p = 0.035), hospital readmission rate (9.4% vs. 7.7%, OR 1.27 [1.04–1.55], p = 0.018), and total hospital LOS (7.3 vs. 6.3 days, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative transfusion is a common occurrence in geriatric fragility hip fractures with multiple risk factors. Careful preoperative planning and multidisciplinary management efforts are warranted to reduce use of postoperative transfusions.

Introduction:Perioperative delirium in elderly hip fracture patients has been correlated with significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative risk factors for and short-term sequelae of postoperative delirium in geriatric hip fracture patients.Methods:We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify geriatric (≥65 years) patients who sustained operative hip fractures in 2016. Cohorts of patients with and without documented postoperative delirium were identified. Primary data on patient demographics and comorbidities were collected and correlated with postoperative complications and hip fracture outcome measures. Multivariate regression was used to compute risk-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of risk factors and sequelae of delirium.Results:In total, 8,439 geriatric hip fracture patients were identified of whom 2,569 patients (30.4%) had postoperative delirium. Age (OR 1.03 [1.02-1.04, p < 0.001), white race (OR 1.54 [1.19-2.00], p = 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (OR 1.20 [1.07-1.36], p = 0.003), baseline dementia (OR 2.46 [2.11-2.86], p < 0.001), and preoperative delirium (OR 10.06 [8.12-12.45], p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in multivariate analysis. Patients with postoperative delirium had a significantly higher risk-adjusted 30-day mortality (12.0% vs. 4.8%, OR 2.22 [1.74-2.84], p < 0.001) and morbidity profile. Postoperative delirium was also independently associated with higher rates of discharge to (OR 1.65 [1.32-2.06], p < 0.001) and prolonged stay in (OR 1.79 [1.53-2.09], p < 0.001) an inpatient facility, hospital readmission (OR 1.94 [1.58-2.38], p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (7.6 ± 5.0 vs. 6.1 ± 4.1 days, p < 0.001), as well as lower rates of immediate postoperative weight bearing (OR 0.73 [0.63-0.86], p < 0.001).Discussion:Postoperative delirium is a common occurrence in geriatric hip fractures with multiple risk factors. Delirium portends higher mortality and worse perioperative hospital-based outcomes.Conclusions:Multidisciplinary foreknowledge and management efforts are warranted to mitigate the risk of developing delirium, which strongly predicts perioperative morbidity, mortality, and hip fracture outcomes.

Background:Functional movement tests that are predictive of injury risk in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes are useful tools for sports medicine professionals. The Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ) measures single-leg balance and reach distances in 3 directions.Purpose:To assess whether the YBT-LQ predicts the laterality and risk of sports-related lower extremity (LE) injury in NCAA athletes.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The YBT-LQ was administered to 294 NCAA Division I athletes from 21 sports during preparticipation physical examinations at a single institution. Athletes were followed prospectively over the course of the corresponding season. Correlation analysis was performed between the laterality of reach asymmetry and composite scores (CS) versus the laterality of injury. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal asymmetry cutoff score for YBT-LQ. A multivariate regression analysis adjusting for sex, sport type, body mass index, and history of prior LE surgery was performed to assess predictors of earlier and higher rates of injury.Results:Neither the laterality of reach asymmetry nor the CS correlated with the laterality of injury. ROC analysis found optimal cutoff scores of 2, 9, and 3 cm for anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral reach, respectively. All of these potential cutoff scores, along with a cutoff score of 4 cm used in the majority of prior studies, were associated with poor sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, none of the asymmetric cutoff scores were associated with earlier or increased rate of injury in the multivariate analyses.Conclusion:YBT-LQ scores alone do not predict LE injury in this collegiate athlete population. Sports medicine professionals should be cautioned against using the YBT-LQ alone to screen for injury risk in collegiate athletes.

The highest failure rates of cemented hip replacement are in males under 50 years of age, usually from acetabular loosening and polyethylene wear. The metal-on-metal Birmingham Resurfacing offers potential advantages to this group because of its wear properties. It also has a low dislocation rate and consequently less restricted activity. The aim of this study was to compare early outcome in young patients, treated for osteoarthritis, either by the Birmingham Resurfacing or hybrid cemented stem with an uncemented cup and press-fit polyethylene liner. 54 patients in each arm were matched for age, sex, body mass index, and pre-operative activity. Outcome was measured by the Oxford Hip Score, with supplementary questions about sporting activity and manual work. 37% of hybrid hip replacements undertook sport or heavy manual work despite specific instruction to the contrary. The Birmingham Resurfacings scored significantly better than the hybrid hip replacements (Mean 3.4 points, 1.3–5.5, 95% Confidence Interval, p<0.05.). Age and duration of symptoms pre-operatively were associated with outcome in the resurfacing group. In the early stages there appears to be justification for using the Birmingham Resurfacing in active young patients. Only long-term follow-up will indicate whether metallosis and neck fracture are lesser complications than polyethylene wear and whether activity can be maintained.

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a significant source of pain and dysfunction resulting from repetitive gripping or wrist extension, radial deviation, and/or forearm supination. Although most cases are self-limiting over several years, controversy exists regarding the best treatment strategy for chronic LE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy (PT), shockwave therapy, and injections with corticosteroids or biologics are all conservative treatment options for LE. For refractory cases, surgical options include open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques. In this review, the current evidence behind these treatment strategies is presented. The data demonstrate that NSAIDs, PT, bracing, and shockwave therapy provide limited benefit for treating LE. Biologics such as platelet-rich plasma and autologous whole-blood injections may be superior to steroid injections in the long-term management of LE. Although the initial results are promising, larger comparative studies on stem cell injections are needed. For refractory LE, open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques are all highly effective, with no method seemingly superior over another. Arthroscopic and percutaneous approaches may result in faster recovery and earlier return to work.

No abstract

Knee articular cartilage defects can result in significant pain and loss of function in active patients. Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation offers a single-stage solution to address large chondral and osteochondral defects by resurfacing focal cartilage defects with mature hyaline cartilage. To date, OCA transplantation of the knee has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and long-term survivorship. However, significant variability still exists among clinicians with regard to parameters for graft acceptance, surgical technique, and rehabilitation. Technologies to optimize graft viability during storage, improve osseous integration of the allograft, and shorten recovery timelines after surgery continue to evolve. The purpose of this review is to examine the latest evidence on treatment indications, graft storage and surgical technique, patient outcomes and survivorship, and rehabilitation after surgery.

No abstract