The function of sperm is to safely transport the haploid paternal genome to the egg containing the maternal genome. The subsequent fertilization leads to transmission of a new unique diploid genome to the next generation. Before the sperm can set out on its adventurous journey, remarkable arrangements need to be made during the post-meiotic stages of spermatogenesis. Haploid spermatids undergo extensive morphological changes, including a striking reorganization and compaction of their chromatin. Thereby, the nucleosomal, histone-based structure is nearly completely substituted by a protamine-based structure. This replacement is likely facilitated by incorporation of histone variants, post-translational histone modifications, chromatin-remodeling complexes, as well as transient DNA strand breaks. The consequences of mutations have revealed that a protamine-based chromatin is essential for fertility in mice but not in Drosophila. Nevertheless, loss of protamines in Drosophila increases the sensitivity to X-rays and thus supports the hypothesis that protamines are necessary to protect the paternal genome. Pharmaceutical approaches have provided the first mechanistic insights and have shown that hyperacetylation of histones just before their displacement is vital for progress in chromatin reorganization but is clearly not the sole inducer. In this review, we highlight the current knowledge on post-meiotic chromatin reorganization and reveal for the first time intriguing parallels in this process in Drosophila and mammals. We conclude with a model that illustrates the possible mechanisms that lead from a histone-based chromatin to a mainly protamine-based structure during spermatid differentiation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin and epigenetic regulation of animal development.

In meiotic prophase, synaptonemal complexes (SCs) closely appose homologous chromosomes (homologs) along their length. SCs are assembled from two axial elements (AEs), one along each homolog, which are connected by numerous transverse filaments (TFs In meiosis, two rounds of chromosome segregation follow one round of replication. The first segregation, meiosis I, is reductional, as homologous chromosomes (homologs) move to opposite poles, whereas meiosis II is equational, because sister chromatids disjoin. The disjunction of homologs is prepared during the prophase of meiosis I, when homologs pair and nonsister chromatids of homologs recombine (for review, see Zickler and Kleckner 1999). The resulting crossovers and cohesion between the sister chromatids connect the homologs and ensure their proper disjunction at meiosis I. In most analyzed eukaryotes, meiotic recombination is accompanied by the close apposition of homologs by a zipper-like proteinaceous structure, the synaptonemal complex (SC). After premeiotic S-phase, the two sister chromatids of each chromosome develop a common axial structure, the axial element (AE), which consists of a linear array of protein complexes involved in sister chromatid cohesion (cohesin complexes), associated with various additional proteins (for review, see Page and Hawley 2004). Numerous transverse filaments (TFs) then connect the AEs of two homologs (synapsis) to form an SC. Within the SC, AEs are called lateral elements (LEs). Genes encoding TF proteins have been identified in mammals (Sycp1), budding yeast (ZIP1), Drosophila (c(3)G), and Caenorhabditis (Syp-1 and Syp-2). SYCP1, Zip1, and C(3)G are long coiled-coil proteins with globular domains at both ends. Within SCs, they form parallel coiled-coil homodimers, which are embedded with their C termini in the LEs, whereas the N termini of TF protein molecules from opposite LEs overlap in the narrow region between the LEs of the two homologs. Caenorhabditis Syp-1 and Syp-2 are two short coiled-coil proteins, which possibly take the place of a single longer coiled-coil protein in other species (for review, see Page and Hawley 2004).In the three species in which it has been analyzed, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis, and yeast, TF-deficient mu-

During meiotic prophase in male mammals, the X and Y chromosomes are incorporated in the XY body. This heterochromatic body is transcriptionally silenced and marked by increased ubiquitination of histone H2A. This led us to investigate the relationship between histone H2A ubiquitination and chromatin silencing in more detail. First, we found that ubiquitinated H2A also marks the silenced X chromosome of the Barr body in female somatic cells. Next, we studied a possible relationship between H2A ubiquitination, chromatin silencing, and unpaired chromatin in meiotic prophase. The mouse models used carry an unpaired autosomal region in male meiosis or unpaired X and Y chromosomes in female meiosis. We show that ubiquitinated histone H2A is associated with transcriptional silencing of large chromatin regions. This silencing in mammalian meiotic prophase cells concerns unpaired chromatin regions and resembles a phenomenon described for the fungus Neurospora crassa and named meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA.Chromatin remodeling is at the basis of control of cellspecific gene expression, cell determination, and differentiation. The nucleosome units of chromatin consist of two each of the histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. The N-terminal ends of these core histones extend from the nucleosome and can undergo posttranslational covalent modifications, such as methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ADP-ribosylation of specific amino acid residues. Together, these modifications constitute the so-called histone code (45). Interaction of other nuclear proteins with chromatin is dependent on the histone code at specific chromatin regions and determines local chromatin structure, which can be open or closed. A remarkable component of the histone code is ubiquitination of C-terminal lysine residues of histones H2A and H2B. Ubiquitin, a protein of 7 kDa, can be attached to lysine residues of a specific protein substrate through the action of a multienzyme complex containing ubiquitin-activating (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating (E2), and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes. Polyubiquitination can target proteins for degradation by the proteasome (34, 35). Monoubiquitination of histones, however, is a stable modification that does not decrease the half-life of the target histone (56).In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, histone H2A ubiquitination is not required for cell growth or sporulation (47), but histone H2B ubiquitination is an essential mechanism involved in sporulation (37). Most importantly, it has been shown that ubiquitination of H2B by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme RAD6, interacting with the ubiquitin ligase BRE1, is a prerequisite for dimethylation of histone H3 at lysine residues 4 and 79 (5,12,37,46). This mechanism is thought to be associated with potentiation of gene activation. It is not known whether this "trans-histone" mechanism is conserved between yeast and mammals. RAD6 shows marked evolutionary conservation. The two mammalian homologs of yeast RAD6, Hr6a/Ube2a and Hr6b/Ube2b, both show approximately 70% amino...

presence of the architectural protein CTCF, numerous DNA breaks, SUMO, UbcD6 and high content of ubiquitin, as well as testes-specific nuclear proteasomes at this time. Moreover, we report the first transition protein-like chromosomal protein, Tpl 94D, to be found in Drosophila. We propose that Tpl 94D -an HMG box protein -and the numerous DNA breaks facilitate chromatin unwinding as a prelude to protamine and Mst77F deposition. Finally, we show that histone modifications and removal are independent of protamine synthesis. ), the presence of CTCF and DNA breaks. We furthermore show that histone removal is independent of the presence of protamines. Both this histone removal and protamine accumulation are essential for transmission of the male genome to the oocyte, and therefore of fundamental importance for the persistence of species. ResultsCore histones and their variants are removed simultaneously from the DNA of spermatid nuclei prior to protamine accumulation In Drosophila melanogaster, sperm morphogenesis, i.e. from meiosis until sperm individualisation, lasts 3.5 days. After meiosis, the nucleus initially is round and then gradually changes its shape accompanied by reorganisation of the chromatin during the canoe stage (Jayaramaiah-Raja and Renkawitz-Pohl, 2005), resulting in sperm containing a slim nucleus in which the nuclear volume is decreased by a factor of 200 (for review see Fuller, 1993;Renkawitz-Pohl et al., 2005).In the work reported here we concentrated on post-meiotic sperm morphogenesis with particular focus on chromatin reorganisation from the nucleosomal-to the protamine-based structure, which is a dramatic switch. Previously, we have reported that the histone variant H2AvD-GFP vanishes at the canoe stage while protamines begin to accumulate simultaneously (Jayaramaiah-Raja and Renkawitz-Pohl, 2005). To analyse the timing of histone removal and protamine accumulation we brought protamine-eGFP and H2AvD-RFP (Clarkson and Saint, 1999) into one genetic background to enable a study in the same individual. We found that H2AvD-RFP disappeared before protamine-eGFP accumulation took place (data not shown). We then went on to immunostain testes of protamine-eGFP flies with an antibody recognising all histones. This antibody was raised against total histones of humans and detects all core histones and the linker histone H1 in mammals. As -in contrast to core histones -H1 is not well conserved between mammals and Drosophila, we presumably detect solely core histones with this antibody. Our findings show that core histones (Fig. 1A) are detectable up to the canoe stage whereas protamines start to be synthesised at the canoe stage (Fig. 1B) but with no apparent positional overlap. As the canoe stage is quite long, we defined the early canoe stage by the start of histone removal, and the late canoe stage by the start of protamine accumulation (see Fig. 1A-E, second and third columns). With histone H3.3, a further replacement variant is expressed in the testis and disappears in post-meiotic stages togethe...

The RAD52 epistasis group is required for recombinational repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) and shows strong evolutionary conservation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RAD52 is one of the key members in this pathway. Strains with mutations in this gene show strong hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in recombination. Inactivation of the mouse homologue of RAD52 in embryonic stem (ES) cells resulted in a reduced frequency of homologous recombination. Unlike the yeast Scrad52 mutant, MmRAD52 ؊/؊ ES cells were not hypersensitive to agents that induce DSBs. MmRAD52 null mutant mice showed no abnormalities in viability, fertility, and the immune system. These results show that, as in S. cerevisiae, MmRAD52 is involved in recombination, although the repair of DNA damage is not affected upon inactivation, indicating that MmRAD52 may be involved in certain types of DSB repair processes and not in others. The effect of inactivating MmRAD52 suggests the presence of genes functionally related to MmRAD52, which can partly compensate for the absence of MmRad52 protein.Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the DNA of living organisms occur during several physiological processes including meiotic recombination, mating-type switching in yeast, and V(D)J rearrangement in developing B and T lymphocytes. Agents such as ionizing radiation and certain chemicals also lead to the induction of DSBs in the genome. If left unrepaired, DSBs result in broken chromosomes and cell death, as has been shown convincingly in yeast (5). Alternatively, incorrect repair of DSBs may generate deletions, chromosome rearrangements, and cell transformation and eventually lead to the formation of tumors.Two main pathways are known to be involved in the repair of DSBs in eukaryotes: end-to-end rejoining, a homology-independent but error-prone process, and error-free repair via (homologous) recombination. Repair of DSBs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs predominantly via recombination, whereas a contribution of end-to-end rejoining can be observed only in a recombination-deficient background (9, 27, 47). Recombinational repair in S. cerevisiae involves the genes of the RAD52 epistasis group, of which nine members have been identified thus far (ScRAD50, ScRAD51, ScRAD52, ScRAD54, ScRAD55, ScRAD57, ScRAD59, ScMRE11, and ScXRS2) (2,11,15,16,44). Interestingly, it has been shown that ScRAD50, ScMRE11, and ScXRS2 are also involved in end-to-end rejoining (10,28,55). Mutations in genes of the RAD52 group result in an increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation and defects in one or more types of recombination. Among these mutants, the Scrad51, Scrad52, and Scrad54 mutants display the most severe radiation sensitivity and defects in recombination.Biochemical experiments with S. cerevisiae have shown that the ScRad51 protein forms nucleoprotein filaments with single-stranded DNA and promotes pairing and limited strand exchange (51). The ScRad52 protein alone or a heterodimer of ScRad55 and ScRad57 functions as a cofactor in this reaction, ...

Male infertility in HR6B knockout mice is associated with impairment of spermatogenesis. The HR6B gene is a mammalian, autosomal homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene Rad6 encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. In addition, X-chromosomal HR6A has been identified, in human and mouse. RAD6 in yeast is required for a variety of cellular functions, including sporulation, DNA repair, and mutagenesis. Since RAD6 and its mammalian homologs can ubiquitinate histones in vitro, we have investigated the pattern of histone ubiquitination in mouse testis. By immunoblot and immunohistochemical analysis of wild-type mouse testis, a high amount of ubiquitinated H2A (uH2A) was detected in pachytene spermatocytes. This signal became undetectable in round spermatids, but then increased again during a relatively short developmental period, in elongating spermatids. No other ubiquitinated histones were observed. In the HR6B knockout mice, we failed to detect an overt defect in the overall pattern of histone ubiquitination. For somatic cell types, it has been shown that histone ubiquitination is associated with destabilization of nucleosomes, in relation to active gene transcription. Unexpectedly, the most intense uH2A signal in pachytene spermatocytes was detected in the sex body, an inactive nuclear structure that contains the heterochromatic X and Y chromosomes. The postmeiotic uH2A immunoexpression in elongating spermatids indicates that nucleosome destabilization induced by histone ubiquitination may play a facilitating role during histone-to-protamine replacement.

During fetal development, anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) is produced only by Sertoli cells, but postnatally, granulosa cells also produce this peptide growth/differentiation factor. We recently identified a candidate AMH type II receptor (AMHRII). In the present study, postnatal ovarian AMH and AMHRII messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was studied by in situ hybridization and ribonuclease protection. In ovaries from adult rats, AMH and AMHRII mRNAs were found to be mainly expressed in granulosa cells from preantral and small antral follicles. Corpora lutea and large antral follicles express little or no AMH and AMHRII mRNA, and primordial follicles and oocytes appeared to be AMH and AMHRII mRNA negative. Thecal and interstitial cells express no detectable AMH mRNA and little or no AMHRII mRNA. The colocalization of AMH and AMHRII mRNAs in granulosa cells of specific follicle types suggests that actions of AMH via AMHRII are autocrine in nature. There is a decreased level of AMH and AMHRII mRNA expression when follicles become atretic. Both mRNA species are eventually lost from atretic follicles, although AMHRII mRNA expression seems to persist somewhat longer than AMH mRNA. During the estrous cycle, no marked changes in the patterns of AMH and AMHRII mRNA expression were detected, except at estrus, when expression of both mRNA species in preantral follicles was decreased compared to that on the other days of the cycle. On postnatal day 5, total ovarian AMH mRNA expression is low and is located in small preantral follicles. During the first weeks of postnatal development, AMH mRNA expression in preantral follicles increases, and the later formed small antral follicles also express AMH mRNA. In contrast, AMHRII mRNA is expressed on postnatal day 5 at a higher level than AMH mRNA, but cannot be localized to specific cell types. From postnatal day 15 onward, AMHRII mRNA expression becomes more restricted to the preantral and small antral follicles. Treatment of prepubertal rats with GnRH antagonist (Org 30276) and human recombinant FSH (Org 32489) or with GnRH antagonist and estradiol benzoate resulted in follicle growth and inhibition of AMH and AMHRII mRNA expression in some, but not all, preantral and small antral follicles. These results indicate that FSH and estrogens may play a role in the down-regulation of AMH and AMHRII mRNA expression in vivo when small antral follicles differentiate into large antral follicles. Furthermore, the FSH surge on the morning of estrus may inhibit AMH and AMHRII mRNA expression in preantral follicles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Homologous recombination is a versatile DNA damage repair pathway requiring Rad51 and Rad54. Here we show that a mammalian Rad54 paralog, Rad54B, displays physical and functional interactions with Rad51 and DNA that are similar to those of Rad54. While ablation of Rad54 in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells leads to a mild reduction in homologous recombination efficiency, the absence of Rad54B has little effect. However, the absence of both Rad54 and Rad54B dramatically reduces homologous recombination efficiency. Furthermore, we show that Rad54B protects ES cells from ionizing radiation and the interstrand DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C. Interestingly, at the ES cell level the paralogs do not display an additive or synergic interaction with respect to mitomycin C sensitivity, yet animals lacking both Rad54 and Rad54B are dramatically sensitized to mitomycin C compared to either single mutant. This suggests that the paralogs possibly function in a tissue-specific manner. Finally, we show that Rad54, but not Rad54B, is needed for a normal distribution of Rad51 on meiotic chromosomes. Thus, even though the paralogs have similar biochemical properties, genetic analysis in mice uncovered their nonoverlapping roles.DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among a plethora of lesions that threaten the integrity of the genome. If not properly processed, DSBs can lead to cell cycle arrest or illegitimate DNA rearrangements such as translocations, inversions, or deletions. These rearrangements can contribute to cell dysfunction, cell death, or carcinogenesis (22). DSBs can arise through the action of exogenous DNA-damaging agents, but they also arise from endogenous sources, such as oxidative DNA damage and as a consequence of DNA replication (10,22). Homologous recombination is a major DNA repair pathway by which DSBs are repaired. Homologous recombination is generally a precise way of resolving DSBs, because it uses homologous sequence, usually provided on the sister chromatid, as a repair template (54).Homologous recombination is a complex process requiring a number of proteins of the RAD52 epistasis group, including Rad51 and Rad54. Rad51 is the key player in this process because it is critical for homology recognition and performs strand exchange between recombining DNA molecules. A pivotal intermediate in these reactions is the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. This forms when Rad51 polymerizes on singlestranded DNA that results from DNA damage processing (54). Rad54 is an important accessory factor for Rad51 (56). A number of biochemical characteristics of Rad54 have been well defined for different species ranging from yeasts to humans (8,18,24,31,37,38,42,47,48,53,55,59). Rad54 is a doublestranded-DNA-dependent ATPase that can translocate on DNA, thereby affecting DNA topology. Biochemically, Rad54 has been implicated in participation in multiple steps of homologous recombination. It can stabilize the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament in an early stage of recombination (30). At a subsequent stage it can promote chromatin rem...