Graphical Abstract Highlights d The exRNA Atlas provides access to human exRNA profiles and web-accessible tools d Atlas analysis reveals six exRNA cargo types present across five human biofluids d Five of the cargo types associate with specific vesicular and non-vesicular carriers d These findings and resources empower studies of extracellular RNA communication An extracellular RNA atlas from five human biofluids (serum, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, and urine) reveals six extracellular RNA cargo types, including both vesicular and nonvesicular carriers. SUMMARY To develop a map of cell-cell communication mediated by extracellular RNA (exRNA), the NIH Extracellular RNA Communication Consortium created the exRNA Atlas resource (https://exrna-atlas.org). The Atlas version 4P1 hosts 5,309 exRNA-seq and exRNA qPCR profiles from 19 studies and a suite of analysis and visualization tools. To analyze variation between profiles, we apply computational deconvolution. The analysis leads to a model with six exRNA cargo types (CT1, CT2, CT3A, CT3B, CT3C, CT4), each detectable in multiple biofluids (serum, plasma, CSF, saliva, urine). Five of the cargo types associate with known vesicular and non-vesicular (lipoprotein and ribonucleoprotein) exRNA carriers. To validate utility of this model, we re-analyze an exercise response study by deconvolution to identify physiologically relevant response pathways that were not detected previously.To enable wide application of this model, as part of the exRNA Atlas resource, we provide tools for deconvolution and analysis of user-provided case-control studies.

Highlights d exceRpt processes and analyzes exRNA profiling data d exceRpt generates quality control metrics, RNA abundance estimates, and reports d A user-friendly, browser-based graphical interface is available d exceRpt processes all RNA-seq datasets in the exRNA Atlas

No abstract

Our results suggest that student physician attitudes to climate change are mutable. Priming students into "medical mode" may alter their opinions on the scientific merit of nonmedical issues, and may be a vestige of a hidden medical curriculum. Further studies should explore the interrelationship between other sociopolitical beliefs and medical decision making.

No abstract