The landing preferences of fed males of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) were measured under constant conditions in a two-choice situation. Pairs of black-and-white landing targets were presented on the grey walls of an arena ca 60 cm in diameter. In a simple choice of blackness vs whiteness, G. m. morsitans showed a ninefold greater preference for black; S. calcitrans displayed no preference. G. m. morsitans landed twice as frequently on a 15 x 30-cm vertical black stripe as on a horizontal one, but S. calcitrans preferred the horizontal one. Comparisons between a vertical stripe (or a horizontal one) and similar stripes sloping at various angles indicated that at about 50° G. m. morsitans distinguished the sloping stripe from the vertical (or the horizontal), but did not well distinguish slopes closer to the vertical (or horizontal). Tests with multiple vertical stripe patterns indicated that G. m. morsitans did not significantly distinguish between a single 15-cm stripe and two-or threestriped targets of the same total black area, but landed significantly less frequently on targets of four or five stripes, implying an angular, behavioural visual 'resolution' of roughly 17°; S. calcitrans responded similarly. Both species showed a marked preference for landing near the edge of the black on all targets, with G. m. morsitans strongly biassed to the black side of an interface.
BackgroundIn Zimbabwe, cases of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) are caused by the unicellular protozoan Trypanosoma brucei, sub-species T. b. rhodesiense. They are reported from the tsetse-infested area in the northern part of the country, broadly corresponding to the valley of the Zambezi River. Tsetse-transmitted trypanosomes, in particular T. congolense and T. vivax, also cause morbidity and mortality in livestock, thus generating poverty and food insecurity. Two species of tsetse fly, Glossina morsistans morsitans and G. pallidipes, are known to be present in the Zambezi Valley, although their distributional patterns and densities have not been investigated in detail. The present study tries to address this gap by providing some insight into the dynamics of trypanosomiasis in humans and livestock.MethodsTsetse distribution and trypanosome infections were studied using traps and fixed fly rounds located at 10 km intervals along a 110 km long transect straddling the southern escarpment of the Zambezi Valley. Three km long fly rounds were conducted on 12 sites, and were repeated 11 times over a 7-month period. Additional traps were deployed and monitored in selected sites. Microscopic examination of 2092 flies for trypanosome infections was conducted.ResultsSurveys confirmed the presence of G. morsitans morsitans and G. pallidipes in the Zambezi Valley floor. Moving south, the apparent density of tsetse flies appears to peak in the vicinity of the escarpment, then drops on the highlands. Only one fly was caught south of the old game fence separating protected and settled areas. A trypanosome infection rate of 6.31% was recorded in tsetse flies dissected. Only one infection of the T. brucei-type was detected.ConclusionsTsetse fly distribution in the study area appears to be driven by ecological factors such as variation in land use and altitude-mediated climatic patterns. Although targeted control of tsetse flies have played a role in determining distribution, no major control operations have been implemented in the area for 15 years. Trypanosome infections in tsetse flies are consistent with HAT epidemiological data, which considers the situation to be generally ‘low risk’. Nonetheless, underreporting is likely to conceal the true epidemiological picture, and efforts are needed to strengthen the diagnostic capacities of health facilities.
A field trial in Zimbabwe investigated the efficacy of insecticide-treated cattle as a barrier to prevent the re-invasion of tsetse, Glossina morsitans and G. pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae), into cleared areas. The original tsetse barrier consisted of insecticide-treated odour-baited targets, at an operational density of four to five targets per km2, supported by insecticide-treatments of cattle with either deltamethrin dip (Decatix, Coopers) at two-weekly intervals, or deltamethrin pouron (Spoton, Coopers) at monthly intervals, in a band approximately 20 km wide from the re-invasion front. Tsetse catch, and trypanosomiasis incidence in nine sentinel herds was recorded for 7-8 months, respectively, before the targets were removed, leaving only the insecticide treatment of the local cattle to stem the re-invasion of tsetse. After the removal of the target barrier, the tsetse readily invaded the trial area and the incidence of trypanosomiasis in sentinel herds increased, while their PCVs decreased. After seven months without the targets in place, trypanosomiasis prevalence in the local stock had reached alarmingly high levels; the trial was terminated prematurely and the target barrier re-deployed. Immediately after the re-deployment of the target barrier, the tsetse catch in the trial area reverted to acceptable levels along the re-invasion front, and trypanosomiasis incidence in the sentinel cattle decreased. It is concluded that, under the conditions of the field trial, the insecticidal treatment of local cattle did not in itself form an effective barrier to tsetse re-invasion. By contrast, the target barrier performed as was predicted by mathematical and experimental analysis, and readily cleared the tsetse infestation and reduced trypanosomosis incidence in the trial area.
The tsetse fly (Glossina spp.) inhabits 11 million km2 of Africa (Greekmore, 1989) where it is responsible for the transmission of trypanosomosis to man and animals. Because of its slow rate of reproduction, with females producing only four to five pupae per annum, control of the tsetse fly is the best means of controlling trypanosomosis. A number of different methods have been and are used but, whilst successes have been achieved, a long term solution has not been found.
Background In the 1980s and 1990s, great strides were taken towards the elimination of tsetse and animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) in Zimbabwe. However, advances in recent years have been limited. Previously freed areas have been at risk of reinvasion, and the disease in tsetse-infested areas remains a constraint to food security. As part of ongoing control activities, monitoring of tsetse and AAT is performed regularly in the main areas at risk. However, a centralized digital archive is missing. To fill this gap, a spatially explicit, national-level database of tsetse and AAT (i.e. atlas) was established through systematic data collation, harmonization and geo-referencing for the period 2000–2019. Methods The atlas covers an area of approximately 70,000 km2, located mostly in the at-risk areas in the north of the country. In the tsetse component, a total of 33,872 entomological records were assembled for 4894 distinct trap locations. For the AAT component, 82,051 samples (mainly dry blood smears from clinically suspicious animals) were collected at 280 diptanks and examined for trypanosomal infection by microscopy. Results Glossina pallidipes (82.7% of the total catches) and Glossina morsitans morsitans (17.3%) were the two tsetse species recorded in the north and northwest parts of the country. No fly was captured in the northeast. The distribution of AAT follows broadly that of tsetse, although sporadic AAT cases were also reported from the northeast, apparently because of transboundary animal movement. Three trypanosome species were reported, namely Trypanosoma brucei (61.7% of recorded infections), Trypanosoma congolense (28.1%) and Trypanosoma vivax (10.2%). The respective prevalences, as estimated in sentinel herds by random sampling, were 2.22, 0.43 and 0.30%, respectively. Discussion The patterns of tsetse and AAT distributions in Zimbabwe are shaped by a combination of bioclimatic factors, historical events such as the rinderpest epizootic at the turn of the twentieth century and extensive and sustained tsetse control that is aimed at progressively eliminating tsetse and trypanosomiasis from the entire country. The comprehensive dataset assembled in the atlas will improve the spatial targeting of surveillance and control activities. It will also represent a valuable tool for research, by enabling large-scale geo-spatial analyses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.