The recent discovery that the hoolock gibbon (Hylobates hoolock [Harlan, 18343) has a karyotype distinct from all other hylobatids provides a new and strong motive for revising gibbon taxonomy and establishing hoolocks in a separate, higher taxon. Revising Groves's taxonomy of 1972, we propose that hoolock, along with the fossil species sericus, occupy a subgenus, Bunopithecus. With the newly added taxon, the genus Hylobates would thus contain four subgenera: Bunopithecus, Hylobates, Nomascus, and Symphalangus. Carolina, Chapel Hill,
INTRODUCTIONThe complexity of resemblances among hylobatid species is reflected in the variety of groupings of these animals in modern classifications. Above the species level, the long-recognized differences between the siamang and other hylobatids have supported classifications containing two genera, Symphalangus and Hylobates [Schultz, 1933; Napier & Napier, 19671. Other taxonomists have emphasized continuity in major traits among hylobatids and have grouped all species into the single genus Hylobates [Kloss, 1929;Miller, 1933; Simonetta, 19571. Groves [1968, 19721 found the concolor as divergent from the lar-group as the siamang, and following Ellerman and Morrison-Scott [ 19511, has provided a genus Hylobates with three subgenera: Symphalangus, Nomascus for the concolor, and Hylobates for the rest [Groves, 19721. This classification is the most nearly comprehensive to date. On the basis of new and old information, we propose revising the classification by splitting the species hoolock from the subgenus Hylobates and placing it in a fourth subgenus with a fossil species resembling hoolock. Received December 13, 1982; accepted March 18,1983 [Groves, 19721. Data on vocalizations further distinguish the hoolock from the subgenus Hylobates and ally it variously with the siamang and the concolor gibbon. For example, in the great call sequences of the siamang and hoolock, male and female parts are interspersed, with moments of simultaneous vocalization. In all other species, either the male's part is concentrated at the end, or the great call is a solo [Marshall & Marshall, 1976; Haimoff et al, 19821.The hoolock gibbon differs from all other hylobatids in its body weight, which is greater than any gibbon species except the siamang [Schultz, 19731. Its third molars are unreduced relative to those of the other hylobatids, although it expresses the cingulum less [Frisch, 19731. A multivariate study of the cranial features of hylobatid has shown the hoolock to be one of five distinct morphological entities, the other four being the siamang and the concolor, Kloss, and lar-group gibbons [Creel & Preuschoft, 1976; cf. Corruccini, 19811. In addition to its distinguishing anatomical and vocal traits, the hoolock gibbon has a karyotype of unique form [Prouty et al, 19831. Three animals from the Greater Los Angeles Zoological Gardens on breeding loan to the Gibbon and Gallinaceous Bird Center, Saugus, California, were identified as hoolocks by pelage, dental morphology, and outer bod...