Background Increasing in popularity, social media provides powerful marketing and networking tools for private practice plastic surgeons. The authors sought to examine social media utilization by academic plastic surgery training programs. Methods Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were queried for plastic surgery training program, program director, and chief/chair accounts. Training program posts were categorized as educational, operative, social, informational, self-promotional, visiting lecturer, research-related, and other. Factors influencing total number of followers were analyzed including number of accounts followed, frequency, total number, and types of posts as well as duration of account. Other variables included geographic location, 2018 to 2019 Doximity residency ranking, and US News and World Report rankings of affiliated hospital systems and medical schools. Social media accounts were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum, and regression analysis. Results Facebook is the most popular social media platform among chiefs/chairs (34, 35.7%), followed by Instagram (20, 21.1%) and Twitter (19, 20.0%). Facebook is used more by program directors (31, 32.6%) followed by Instagram (22, 23.1%) and Twitter (15, 15.7%). The majority of Facebook and Twitter leadership accounts are for personal use (62%–67%), whereas Twitter is used primarily for professional purposes (60%–84%). Training program social media use is rising, with Instagram and Twitter presence growing at exponential rates (R 2 = 0.97 and 0.97, respectively). Of 95 training programs evaluated, 54 (56.8%) have Instagram accounts, 29 (30.5%) have Facebook accounts, and 27 (28.4%) have Twitter accounts. Most training programs using social media have 2 or more accounts (37, 67.3%). West coast programs have more Instagram followers than other geographic regions, significantly more than Southern programs (P = 0.05). Program accounts with more followers are affiliated with top-ranked hospitals (P = 0.0042) or top-ranked Doximity training programs (P = 0.02). Conclusions Similar to its adoption by private practice plastic surgery, social media use in academic plastic surgery is growing exponentially. Now, over half of residency programs have Instagram accounts. Program leaders are using Facebook and Instagram primarily for personal use and Twitter for professional use. Programs affiliated with a top-ranked hospital or ranked highly by Doximity have more followers on social media.

Background Traumatic limb salvage with free flap reconstruction versus primary amputation for lower extremity (LE) injuries remains an oft debated topic. Limb salvage has well-studied benefits and advances in microsurgery have helped reduce the complication rates. A subset of patients eventually requires secondary amputation after a failed attempt at limb salvage. A better understanding of risk factors that predict subsequent amputation after failed free flap reconstruction of LE injuries may improve operative management. Patients and Methods A retrospective study (2002–2019) was conducted on all patients who underwent free flap reconstruction of the LE within 120 days of the original inciting event at a single institution. Patient and operative factors were reviewed including comorbidities, severity of the injury, flap choice, outcomes, and complications. Predictors of subsequent amputation were analyzed. Results A total of 129 patients requiring free flap reconstructions for LE limb salvage met inclusion criteria. Anterolateral thigh flaps (70.5%) were performed most frequently. Secondary amputation occurred in 10 (7.8%) patients. Preoperative factors associated with eventual amputation include diabetes mellitus (p = 0.044), number of preoperative debridements (p = 0.013), evidence of any arterial injury/pathology (p = 0.008), specifically posterior tibial artery (p = < 0.0001), and degree of three-vessel runoff (p = 0.007). Operative factors associated with subsequent amputation include evidence of recipient artery injury/pathology (p = 0.008). Postoperative factors associated with secondary amputation include total flap failure (p = 0.001), partial flap failure (p = 0.002), minor complications (p = 0.037), and residual osteomyelitis (p = 0.028). Conclusion Many factors contribute to the reconstructive surgical team's decision to proceed with limb salvage or perform primary amputation. Several variables are associated with failed limb salvage resulting in secondary amputation. Further studies are required to better guide management during the limb salvage process.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Despite advanced wound care techniques, open fractures in the setting of lower extremity trauma remain a challenging pathology, particularly when free tissue transfer is required for coverage. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with flap failure in this setting using a large, heterogeneous patient population. Methods Retrospective review of patients who underwent traumatic lower extremity free flap reconstruction (2002–2019). Demographics wound/vessel injury characteristics, pre and perioperative factors, and flap outcomes were analyzed. Results One hundred eighty‐eight free flaps met inclusion criteria, with 23 partial (12.2%) and 13 total (6.9%) flap failures. Angiography was performed in 87 patients, with arterial injury suffered in 43.1% of those evaluated. Time to flap coverage varied within 3 days (4.5%), 10 days (17.3%), or 30 days of injury (42.7%). In all, 41 (21.8%) subjects suffered from major flap complications, including failure and takebacks. Multivariate regression demonstrated the presence of posterior tibial (PT) artery injury predictive of both flap‐failure (Odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, p < .015) and major flap complications (OR = 12.1, p < .012). Immunocompromised status was also predictive of flap failure (OR = 12.6, p < .004) and major complications (OR = 11.6, p < .007), while achieving flap coverage within 30 days was protective against flap complications (OR = 0.413, p < .049). Defect size, infection, and injury location were not associated with failure. Conclusions When examining a large, heterogeneous patient cohort, free flap outcomes in the setting of lower extremity open fractures can be influenced by multiple factors. This presence of PT artery injury, flap coverage beyond 30 days of injury, and immunocompromised status appear predictive of flap complications in this context.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The number of adults with master's, professional, and doctoral degrees has doubled since 2000. The relevance of advanced degrees in plastic surgery has not been explored. Methods: Faculty, residents, and recent alumni with advanced degrees from the United States plastic surgery training programs were identified. Degrees were analyzed based on geography, program/hospital rankings, department versus division status, gender, leadership/editorial roles, private versus academic practice, subspecialization training, academic productivity/H-indices, and National Institutes of Health funding. Results: A total of 986 faculties, 1001 residents, and 761 alumni credentials from 95 training programs were reviewed: 9.3% of faculties, 7.1% of residents, and 6.3% of alumni have advanced degrees, majority being men (71%). Residency programs ranked top 10 by Doximity or affiliated with a top 10 medical school/hospital have more faculty/residents/alumni with advanced degrees (P < 0.01). Faculty holding PhDs are less likely fellowship trained (52.5% versus 74.0%, P = 0.034). Master's in Business Administration (MBA) is associated with chair/chief status (30.0% versus 8.57%, P = 0.01) or other major academic title (eg, Dean, Director) (70.0% versus 37.14%, P = 0.01). No significant associations exist between degree type and professor status, research productivity, academic versus private practice, or subspecialization (eg, craniofacial surgery). Conclusion: The majority of plastic surgeons with advanced degrees have PhDs, although there is an increasing trend of other research degrees (eg, Master's in Public Health) in current trainees. MBA is associated with chair/chief status or other major academic title. Reasons for obtaining an advanced degree and impact on career deserve further attention.