No abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Asia has an incidence rather lower than in Western countries yet tends to afflict a younger population. As in the West, imatinib mesylate (IM, Glivec) has supplanted busulphan, hydroxyurea and interferon-alpha as first-line treatment. Its use has resulted in a dramatic decline in the number of hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) performed. Although it is expensive, IM induces a complete cytogenetic response in 60-90% of newly diagnosed patients, and up to 10% for those in blastic phase. The standard dose of 400 mg is well tolerated by most patients, although adverse events have been observed, including drug-induced cytopenia. Through the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program, the majority of CML patients has access to IM and can expect prolonged survival, even in the absence of HSCT. However, just as in Western countries, resistance to imatinib has emerged in Asian countries. They will require the novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (dasatinib, nilotinib) becoming available through either clinical trials or market approval. This review examines the available data on CML in China, Hong Kong, India, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand.

The acetylator phenotype and genotype of AIDS patients, with and without an acute illness, was compared with that of healthy control subjects (30 per group). Two probe drugs, caffeine and dapsone, were used to determine the phenotype in the acutely ill cohort. Polymerase chain reaction amplification and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis served to distinguish between the 26 known NAT2 alleles and the 21 most common NAT1 alleles. The distribution (%) of slow:rapid acetylator phenotype seen among acutely ill AIDS patients differed with the probe substrate used: 70:30 with caffeine versus 53:47 with dapsone. Phenotype assignment differed considerably between the two methods and there were numerous discrepancies between phenotype and genotype. The NAT2 genotype distribution was 45:55 slow:rapid. Control subjects, phenotyped only with caffeine, were 67:33 slow:rapid versus 60:40 genotypically. Stable AIDS patients, phenotyped only with dapsone, were 55:45 slow:rapid versus 46:54 genotypically. Following resolution of their acute infections, 12 of the acutely ill subjects were rephenotyped with dapsone. Phenotype assignment remained unchanged in all cases. The distribution of NAT1 alleles was similar in all three groups. It is evident from the amount of discordance between caffeine phenotype and dapsone phenotype or genotype that caution should be exercised in the use of caffeine as a probe for NAT2 in acutely ill patients. It is also clear that meaningful study of the acetylation polymorphism requires both phenotypic and genotypic data.

Adverse reactions to sulfonamides occur at a higher frequency in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) than noninfected patients. Some studies have suggested that patients with the slow acetylator phenotype are predisposed to these reactions, whereas other studies suggest that the slow acetylator genotype is not a predisposing factor. To rationalize these seemingly contradictory observations, the authors determined the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genotype and phenotype in patients with and without a history of hypersensitivity reactions to sulfonamides. HIV-infected patients with a history of a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were enrolled, along with a group of AIDS patients with no history of hypersensitivity (delayed or immediate). NAT2 phenotype was determined in both groups using dapsone, while the genotype was determined using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Ten of 14 patients (71%) with a history of hypersensitivity exhibited the slow acetylator phenotype, while 8 of 14 patients (57%) without such a history exhibited this same phenotype (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-9.0; p = 0.69, Fisher's Exact Test). While 9 of 14 patients (64%) with a history of hypersensitivity exhibited a slow acetylator genotype, only 4 of 14 patients (29%) without such a history exhibited this genotype (ns). There were more instances of discordance between deduced and actual phenotype in the nonhypersensitive patients (n = 4) than in the hypersensitive patients (n = 1). The reported higher frequency of the slow acetylator phenotype among patients with a history of hypersensitivity to sulfonamides does not appear to be explained by metabolic changes that would cause discordance between acetylator genotype and phenotype.