Background Clinical pharmacists are established members of the interprofessional patient care team, but limited guidance for the optimal utilization of pharmacy resources is available. Objective measurement of medication regimen complexity offers a novel process for evaluating pharmacist activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between medication regimen complexity, as measured by a novel medication regimen complexity scoring tool (MRC‐ICU), and both pharmacist interventions and drug‐drug interactions (DDIs). Methods This was a multi‐center, prospective, observational study. The electronic medical record was reviewed to collect patient demographics, patient outcomes, and MRC‐ICU and modified MRC‐ICU (mMRC‐ICU) score at 24, 48 hours, and at discharge. Pharmacist interventions were recorded during the patients' intensive care unit (ICU) stay. DDIs were also evaluated at 24, 48 hours, and at discharge. Spearman's rank‐order correlation was used to determine any correlation between the MRC‐ICU score at each time point and the number of pharmacist interventions and DDIs. Results A total of 153 patients were evaluated from both centers. The median MRC‐ICU at 24 hours was 11 (interquartile range [IQR] 7‐15). MRC‐ICU at 24 hours was correlated with interventions at 24 hours (rs .439, P <.001). Furthermore, MRC‐ICU was correlated with total DDIs (rs .4, P < .001). A modified version of the MRC‐ICU was also correlated with number of pharmacist interventions (P < .001) and DDIs (P < .001). Conclusions Medication regimen complexity showed a relationship with number of pharmacist interventions and number of DDIs.
Background The MRC-ICU, a novel regimen complexity scoring tool, provides an objective measure of medication regimen complexity in critically ill patients. The MRC-ICU may have the ability to evaluate the impact of critical care pharmacists on patient outcomes but requires further validation. The objective of this study was to confirm the external validity of the MRC-ICU scoring tool at multiple institutions and intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Methods This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. The electronic medical record was reviewed to collect patient demographics and patient outcomes, and the medication administration record was reviewed to collect MRC-ICU scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, and ICU discharge. Validation was performed by assessing convergent and divergent validity of the score. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to determine correlation. Results A total of 230 patients were evaluated across both centers in both medical ICUs and surgical ICUs. Differences between the original center and the new site included that total number of orders (29 vs 126; P < 0.001) and total number of medication orders (17 vs 36; P < 0.001) were higher at the new site, whereas the original site had higher overall MRC-ICU scores (14 vs 11; P = 0.004). The MRC-ICU showed appropriate convergent validity with number of orders and medication orders (all P < 0.001) and appropriate divergent validity with no significant correlation found between age, weight, or gender (all P > 0.05). Conclusions External validity of the MRC-ICU has been confirmed through evaluation at an external site and in the surgical ICU population. The MRC-ICU scoring tool requires prospective evaluation to provide objective data regarding optimal pharmacist use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.