This article presents evidence of the scale, relative intensity, and social determinants of immigrants' transnational political engagement. It demonstrates that a stable and significant transnational field of political action connecting immigrants with their polities of origin does indeed exist. The results help temper celebratory images of the extent and effects of transnational engagement provided by some scholars. The article shows that migrants' habitual transnational political engagement is far from being as extensive, socially unbounded, "deterritorialized," and liberatory as previously argued. Transnational political action, then, is regularly undertaken by a small minority, is socially bounded across national borders, occurs in quite specific territorial jurisdictions, and appears to reproduce preexisting power asymmetries. The potential of transnationalism for transforming such asymmetries within and across countries has yet to be determined. Grassroots symbolic and material relations connecting societies across national borders expanded to historic levels during the last third of the 20th century. These transnational connections simultaneously affect more 1 The data on which this article is based were collected by the Comparative Immigrant Entrepreneurship Project (CIEP) supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (SBR-9796286), Ford Foundation (no.
This paper summarises a research program on the new immigrant second generation initiated in the early 1990s and completed in 2006. The four field waves of the Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (CILS) are described and the main theoretical models emerging from it are presented and graphically summarised. After considering critical views of this theory, we present the most recent results from this longitudinal research program in the forum of quantitative models predicting downward assimilation in early adulthood and qualitative interviews identifying ways to escape it by disadvantaged children of immigrants. Quantitative results strongly support the predicted effects of exogenous variables identified by segmented assimilation theory and identify the intervening factors during adolescence that mediate their influence on adult outcomes. Qualitative evidence gathered during the last stage of the study points to three factors that can lead to exceptional educational achievement among disadvantaged youths. All three indicate the positive influence of selective acculturation. Implications of these findings for theory and policy are discussed.
We summarize prior theories on the adaptation process of the contemporary immigrant
second generation as a prelude to presenting additive and interactive models showing the impact of
family variables, school contexts and academic outcomes on the process. For this purpose, we regress
indicators of educational and occupational achievement in early adulthood on predictors measured
three and six years earlier. The Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study (CILS), used for the
analysis, allows us to establish a clear temporal order among exogenous predictors and the two
dependent variables. We also construct a Downward Assimilation Index (DAI), based on six indicators
and regress it on the same set of predictors. Results confirm a pattern of segmented assimilation in
the second generation, with a significant proportion of the sample experiencing downward
assimilation. Predictors of the latter are the obverse of those of educational and occupational
achievement. Significant interaction effects emerge between these predictors and early school
contexts, defined by different class and racial compositions. Implications of these results for
theory and policy are examined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.