Background. Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction is often difficult. To determine whether measurement of peak oxygen consumption (Vo2) during maximal exercise testing can be used to identify patients in whom transplantation can be safely deferred, we prospectively performed exercise testing on all ambulatory patients referred for transplant between October 1986 and December 1989. Methods and Results. Patients were assigned into one of three groups on the basis of exercise data: Group 1 (n=35) comprised patients accepted for transplant (Vo2<14 ml/kg/min); group 2 (n=52) comprised patients considered too well for transplant (Vo2>14 ml/kg/min); and group 3 (n=27) comprised patients with low Vo2 rejected for transplant due to noncardiac problems. All three groups were comparable in New York Heart Association functional class, ejection fraction, and cardiac index (p=NS). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was significantly lower in group 2 than in either group 1 or 3 (p<0.05), although there was wide overlap. Patients with preserved exercise capacity (group 2) had cumulative 1-and 2-year survival rates of 94% and 84%, which are equal to survival levels after transplantation. In contrast, patients rejected for transplant (group 3) had survival rates of only 47% at 1 year and 32% at 2 years, whereas patients awaiting transplantation (group 1) had a survival rate of 790% at 1 year (both p <0.005 versus patients with Vo2> 14 ml/kg/min). All deaths in group 2 were sudden. By univariate and multivariate analyses, peak Vo2 was the best predictor of survival, with only pulmonary capillary wedge pressure providing additional prognostic information.Conclusions. These data suggest that cardiac transplantation can be safely deferred in ambulatory patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and peak exercise Vo2 of more than 14 ml/min/kg. (Circulation 1991;83:778-786)
interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur. The relationship with industry information for the writing committee members is posted on the ACC and AHA World Wide Web sites with the full-length version of the update.
This sheath-deployed, bioabsorbable device provides a safe and effective means of obtaining rapid arterial hemostasis after cardiac catheterization procedures. It appears to be particularly useful in those patients most at risk for access site complications.
In addition to the expected abnormalities in steady measures of pulmonary artery hemodynamics at rest in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, rest and exercise measures of oscillatory behavior (characteristic impedance and pulse wave reflection) are perturbed. Measures of steady and pulsatile behavior, particularly wave reflection, appear to have an important role in the exercise response of these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.