Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma (CSM) is a recently recognized, histopathological variant of myoepithelial (ME) tumors of the skin. It is characterized by a syncytial arrangement of spindled, ovoid, and/or epithelioid cells forming a well-circumscribed, unencapsulated dermal nodule.There is a paucity of intervening stroma, and absent duct or gland formation. Strong immunohistochemical staining for S100 and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) has been described, while cytokeratin expression has been uncommon. The majority of CSMs harbor a rearrangement involving the EWSR1 gene. Although various fusion partner genes have been discovered in ME tumors at other anatomic sites, none has yet been described in CSM. We present a case of CSM represented clinically by a papule on the mid-upper back of a healthy 44-year-old female. It exhibited morphological and immunohistochemical features of a CSM with strong, diffuse S100 and alpha-actin expression, and focal positivity for EMA and cytokeratin AE1/AE3. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization showed an EWSR1 gene rearrangement. Massively parallel next-generation RNA sequencing revealed PBX3 as the fusion partner. The EWSR1-PBX3 gene fusion has been previously identified in three cases of ME tumors of bone and soft tissue, and in a case of retroperitoneal leiomyoma. This is the first report of an EWSR1-PBX3 fusion in CSM.

Apocrine hidradenomas (AH) once believed to harbor myoepithelial cells are now considered pure epithelial neoplasms. They are categorized separately from adenomyoepitheliomas which consist of apocrine epithelial and myoepithelial components. Reports of myoepithelial tumors arising in AH have suggested a link between the 2. Our goal was to explore whether cases diagnosed on routine microscopy as AH harbored occult myoepithelial elements, which would be disclosed by an immunohistochemical evaluation. Twenty-nine such cases, derived from a teaching collection of one of the authors, formed the basis of the study. Clinical and demographic data were documented, and morphological details of the cases were recorded. A panel of immunohistochemistry (AE1AE3, CK8/18, epithelial membrane antigen, p63, S100 protein, glial fibrillary acid protein, calponin, alpha actin, and others), designed to identify myoepithelial cells, was used. The population consisted of 14 women and 15 men (mean age 55.8; range 26–82 years). The tumors, located on the head/neck (14), limbs (10), and trunk (5), were solid (2) and solid/cystic (27). They exhibited varied (often combined) cytological elements (clear, squamoid, polygonal, and mucinous cells). On immunohistochemistry, aggregates of myoepithelial cells were identified in 5 (17%) cases. Four were calponin+ and AE1AE3+; they occupied ≤30% of tumor volumes and exhibited fusiform cytomorphology. One was S100 protein+ and AE1AE3+; it occupied 70% of tumor volume and exhibited polygonal cytomorphology. The gradation in the volume of myoepithelial elements disclosed by immunohistochemistry in a subset of our cases suggests that AH and adenomyoepitheliomas exist on a biological continuum of adnexal neoplasia. The diagnostic categorization of lesions with dual elements requires further study, but we propose that the term adenomyoepithelioma be restricted to those in which myoepithelial cells constitute ≥25% of tumor volume.