In radiation therapy one is confronted with the task of formulating a treatment plan which delivers a specified dose to a tumour but avoids irreparable damage to surrounding uninvolved structures. Radiation therapy treatment planning (RTTP) involves an inverse and a forward problem. The inverse problem is to devise a treatment plan, i.e. a radiation beam configuration and beam weighting, which provides a specified dose distribution to the delineated region. The forward problem is to calculate the dose distribution within the patient that results from the weighted radiation beam configuration. Since no analytic closed-form mathematical formulation of the forward operator exists, the inverse problem actually calls for computerised inversion of data. This inversion is achieved by constructing a fully discretised model that leads to a system of linear inequalities. These inequalities are solved either by a row-action method or a block-Cimmino algorithm which allows the assignment of weights within each block of inequalities.
This article evaluates the responses of 14 dogs with brain masses using orthovoltage irradiation for definitive treatment. Dogs were anesthetized for computed tomography (CT) examination, formation of head immobilization and positioning devices, radiation treatment simulation, and treatments. Total doses of 39 Gy (9 dogs) or 45 Gy (5 dogs) to the tumor were administered over 25 to 41 days. Two or three portals (parallel opposed lateral with or without a dorsal field) were used. Treatment volumes included the tumor and peritumoral edema, as determined by CT scan, and a I-cm margin. Histopathologic diagnoses were available in 9 of 14 dogs. There were 4 meningiomas, 1 lymphosarcoma, 1 pituitary adenoma, 1 metastatic anaplastic carcinoma, 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma and 1 dog with granulomatous meningoencephalitis. At the end of radiation therapy, 10 dogs could be evaluated for progression of clinical signs: 3 dogs deteriorated or failed to improve, and 7 dogs improved. At the time of analysis, all dogs were dead. Mean and median survival times, measured from the beginning of radiation, were 345 and 489 days, respectively. This was compared with mean survival times of 30 to 81 days reported in the literature for dogs with brain tumors that did not receive treatment. The median survival time of 9 dogs treated with 39 Gy was 153 days, versus 519 days for 5 dogs that received 45 Gy. It appears that radiation therapy prolongs survival times for dogs with brain masses. Although megavoltage therapy would be optimal, orthovoltage radiation can be applied in total doses of 45 Gy in 3.75 Gy fractions over 28 days without adverse effects. Histopathologic evidence of multifocal demyelination and astrocytosis may be found.
103 patients with the diagnosis of AAF were identified from the RT/BCNU arms of 3 RTOG malignant glioma trials. Pre-treatment tumor size was less than 5 cm for 48% and greater than or equal to 5 cm for 52%, and tumor sites were frontal lobe in 55%, temporal in 25%, and parietal in 16%. Surgery consisted of biopsy for 30%, partial resection for 56%, and total resection for 14%. Extent of surgery correlated with age, with 81% of patients less than 40 undergoing partial/total resection vs. 60% of those over 40 (P = 0.019). The median survival time (MST) of patients undergoing partial/total resection was 49 mo., vs. 18 mo. for those biopsied only (P = 0.002). Patients with frontal location had longer MST than those with non-frontal lesions (MST: 49 vs. 25 mo., P = 0.047), while no survival difference was apparent by univariate analysis of tumor size. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only younger age, frontal location, and smaller tumor size correlated significantly with extended survival. Extent of surgery was not predictive. The close correlation between young age and extensive surgery obscures the survival advantage for greater surgery seen with univariate analysis. Smaller tumor size and frontal location favorably influence outcome even when adjusted by age.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.