For-profit, or proprietary, home health agencies were banned from Medicare until 1980 but now account for a majority of the agencies that provide such services. Medicare home health costs have grown rapidly since the implementation of a risk-based prospective payment system in 2000. We analyzed recent national cost and case-mix-adjusted quality outcomes to assess the performance of for-profit and nonprofit home health agencies. For-profit agencies scored slightly but significantly worse on overall quality indicators compared to nonprofits (77.18 percent and 78.71 percent, respectively). Notably, for-profit agencies scored lower than nonprofits on the clinically important outcome "avoidance of hospitalization" (71.64 percent versus 73.53 percent). Scores on quality measures were lowest in the South, where for-profits predominate. Compared to nonprofits, proprietary agencies also had higher costs per patient ($4,827 versus $4,075), were more profitable, and had higher administrative costs. Our findings raise concerns about whether for-profit agencies should continue to be eligible for Medicare payments and about the efficiency of Medicare's market-oriented, risk-based home care payment system.
There is significant literature on the importance of addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve health care outcomes. In response, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has expanded Medicare Advantage plans ability to cover SDOH-related services. Medicare home health does not cover SDOH-related services. A literature review indicates no studies on the nature, significance, or impacts of the lack of SDOH coverage in Medicare home health. This article summarizes an initial, exploratory study to address the literature gap, based on interviews of a convenience sample of 29 home care social workers between January 2013 and May 2014 in the New York City metropolitan area. Results indicate social workers believe the lack of SDOH coverage, including social work, in Medicare home health results in exacerbation of existing patient conditions; creation of new, additional patient conditions; increased home care readmissions and rehospitalizations; increased caregiver burden; and exacerbation of patients’ mental health and substance abuse needs. Policymakers are urged to consider adding coverage of social work and SDOH to Medicare home health.
There is a high prevalence of depression among the general elderly population. There is an even higher prevalence among elderly receiving home health care, with a conservative estimate of 13.5% having clinically defined major depression. The Medicare Home Health Benefit provides limited coverage, eligibility, and payment for mental health services, and the national Outcome Assessment and Information Set (OASIS) assessment instrument has had limited requirements on assessing, diagnosing, and treating depression. However, the new OASIS-C significantly increases the depression-related requirements, though still not requiring assessments and not adding prospective payment reimbursement for patients with depression. The new OASIS-C requirements provide a gateway to home care providers seeking to expand depression care, especially combined with evidence-based models of primary care-based collaborative depression management programs such as the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) program. The article explains IMPACT, explores its cost savings and care improvement outcomes, and explores how Medicare and private duty home care providers might use IMPACT-type models to improve their patient care and agency fiscal health.
There is significant data on the adverse impact of COVID-19 on persons who were poor, minorities, had compromised physical or mental health, or other vulnerabilities prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. A significant portion of the overall Medicare population has such vulnerabilities. The Medicare home health beneficiary population is even more vulnerable than the overall Medicare population based on gender, race, income level, living alone status, and number of chronic conditions. A literature review indicates there is only 1 study on the impact of COVID-19 in Medicare home health on home care workers and none on the impact on home health beneficiaries. The current study is a qualitative study based on interviews of a convenience sample of 48 home care nurses from 9 different home health agencies in New York City between April 1 and August 31, 2020. Six major themes emerged: need for social service supports increased; loneliness and depression increased among patients; physical and mental health conditions became exacerbated; substance use and abuse increased; evidence of domestic violence against patients increased; and there was a limited amount of staff and equipment to care for patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.