Lacosamide-a third-generation antiepileptic drug available in multiple formulations-was first approved in 2008 as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults. In 2014, lacosamide was approved as monotherapy for POS by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A loading dose administration was approved in 2013 by the European Medicines Agency and in 2014 by the FDA. Unlike traditional sodium channel blockers affecting fast inactivation, lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation. This mechanism of action results in stabilization of hyperexcitable neuronal membranes, inhibition of neuronal firing and reduction in long-term channel availability without affecting physiological function. Lacosamide is rapidly absorbed, with maximum plasma concentrations reached 0.5-4 h after intake. Oral bioavailability is high (100 %) for a dose up to 800 mg. Bioavailability is irrespective of food intake. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters is low (coefficients of variation almost all <20 %). The pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide is consistent in healthy subjects and across different patient populations studied. Lacosamide elimination from plasma occurs with a terminal half-life of approximately 13 h in young subjects and 14-16 h in elderly subjects; this difference does not impact the dose regimen. Lacosamide produces a pharmacodynamic effect that is closely correlated with its plasma concentration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship for reduction of seizure frequency can be described by a maximum effect (E max) model. Lacosamide does not induce or inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes or known drug transporter systems, has low protein binding of less than 15 % and, because it has multiple elimination pathways, it has no clinically relevant interactions with commonly prescribed medications.

The potential effects of the dopamine agonist rotigotine on cardiac repolarization were studied in patients with Parkinson's disease, which affects electrocardiogram (ECG) quality. The parallel-group trial was double-blind and placebo- and positive (moxifloxacin 400 mg)-controlled. After two 24-h baseline ECGs, patients were randomized to rotigotine (n = 66) or placebo (n = 64). Twenty four-hour ECGs were recorded on days 14/15, 21/22, 28/29, 35/36, and 42/43 of a regimen involving weekly dose escalations of 4 mg/24 h (4 mg/24 h-24 mg/24 h). In 10-s ECGs (n = 357,948) selected from 24-h records, QT measurements were manually verified and individually rate-corrected (QTc). Assay sensitivity showed maximum mean 13.5 ms QTc prolongation after moxifloxacin with 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8-15.2 ms. Rotigotine vs. placebo differences in time-matched changes from baseline (54 data points/24 h) showed mean effects close to zero with upper one-sided 95% CI <5 ms. Accurate, thorough QTc studies are possible even in patients with diseases that profoundly affect ECG quality. Rotigotine in supra- and therapeutic doses was shown not to affect cardiac repolarization.

No abstract

ABSTRACT:The dopamine agonist rotigotine was developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. Disposition, metabolism, elimination, and absolute bioavailability of rotigotine were determined in six healthy male subjects by using two different forms of administration in a randomized sequence with a crossover design.

SUMMARYPurpose: To test for bioequivalence of 200 mg lacosamide oral tablet and syrup formulations. Additional objectives were to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide in saliva and plasma, and to evaluate its tolerability.Methods: This open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial was conducted in 16 healthy Caucasian male participants in Germany. The bioequivalence of 200 mg lacosamide tablet and syrup was evaluated using plasma to determine maximum measured concentration (C max ) and area under the curve from zero to the last time point (AUC) (0-tz) . Plasma and saliva samples for evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters of lacosamide and the major metabolite O-desmethyl lacosamide (SPM 12809) were taken over 15 time points (0.5-72 h) and used to statistically compare bioavailability of the two. Urine samples were collected predose and over five time points (0-48 h) to evaluate the cumulative amount of unchanged drug and metabolite. Key Findings: Lacosamide median time to reach C max (t max ) was 1 h for tablet and 0.5 h for syrup in plasma and saliva. Mean terminal half life (t ½ ) for tablet and syrup was 12.5 and 12.4 h in plasma, and 13.1 and 13.3 h in saliva, respectively. Tablet and syrup mean plasma AUC (0-tz) was 84.5 and 83.3 lg/mL*h, respectively. Mean AUC (0-tz) in saliva was 93.2 lg/mL*h for tablet and syrup. Mean C max for tablet was 5.26 lg/mL in plasma and 5.63 lg/mL in saliva. Syrup mean C max was 5.14 and 8.32 lg/mL in plasma and saliva, respectively. Within 2 h of syrup administration, elevated lacosamide concentration in saliva compared to plasma was observed. The ratio of lacosamide syrup to tablet was 0.98 for C max and 0.99 for AUC (0-tz) in plasma, and 1.00 for AUC (0-tz) in saliva; the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for these parameters were within the range of 0.80-1.25, which meets accepted bioequivalence criteria. The syrup-to-tablet ratio for C max in saliva was 1.48, and the 90% CIs exceeded the accepted upper boundary for bioequivalence (1.32-1.66). Both formulations were well tolerated. Metabolite concentration versus time profiles for saliva were similar to plasma following tablet and syrup administration. Significance: The tablet and syrup formulations of lacosamide 200 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated. Saliva samples were demonstrated to be a suitable surrogate to evaluate lacosamide tablet pharmacokinetics in the central compartment. Due to residual syrup in the buccal cavity, limitations exist when using saliva to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide syrup <2 h after administration.