Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45, p(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-8) and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p(trend) = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, p(trend) = 5 x 10(-5) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

To establish the importance of CHEK2 mutations for familial breast cancer incidence in the German population, we have screened all 14 of the coding exons in 516 families negative for mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We found 12 distinct variants in 30 unrelated patients (5.81%), including 5 that are novel and an additional 4 found for the first time in breast cancer. These aberrations were evaluated in 500 healthy women aged over 50 years and in the case of the 2 exon 10 mutations, 1100delC and 1214del4bp, in 1315 randomized healthy controls. According to our results, a statistically significant association for the exon 10 mutations was observed (p ‫؍‬ 0.006). The prevalence of the 1100delC mutation in the German population, however, is significantly lower than those reported for other Caucasian populations both in familial breast cancer patients (1.6%) and controls (0.5%), and shows independent segregation with breast cancer in 2 of 4 families analyzed. The remaining 10 variants were more abundant in patients (21) compared to the controls (12) although the difference was not statistically significant. Interestingly, we found no increased breast cancer risk associated with the splice site mutation IVS2؉1G3 A or the most common missense mutation I157T, which account for more than half (12/21) of the variants observed in patients. The low prevalence and penetrance of the exon 10 deletion mutations together with no, or an uncertain elevation in risk for other CHEK2 mutations suggests a limited relevance for CHEK2 mutations in familial breast cancer. Further evaluation of the unique variants observed in breast cancer is required to determine if they may play a role in a polygenic model of familial breast cancer. Nevertheless, it seems premature to include CHEK2 screening in genetic testing.

We have tested for large BRCA1 gene rearrangements in German high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families previously screened negative for point mutations by dHPLC and sequencing. Using the novel MLPA method, two deletions of exons 1A, 1B and 2 and exon 17, respectively, were detected in four out of 75 families investigated in Southern Germany. An identical exon 17 deletion with the same breakpoints and a deletion of exons 1A, 1B and 2 were found by fluorescent multiplex PCR in two out of 30 families investigated in Northern Germany. Combining both populations, genomic rearrangements were found in 6 % of the mutation-negative families and 3 % of all high-risk families and account for 8 % of all BRCA1 mutations. Our data indicate that the exon 17 deletion may be a founder mutation in the German population. The prevalence of BRCA1 gene deletions or duplications in our patients is similar to previous reports from Germany and France. Genomic quantification by MLPA is a useful method for molecular diagnostics in high-risk breast cancer families.

At present, the BRCA2 mutations c.4415_4418delAGAA and c.6033_6034insGT have not been identified in any investigated population except the Iranian. Whether both mutations are specific for the Iranian population or a special subgroup remains to be investigated in larger studies. The absence of BRCA1 mutations in the analysed families may suggest that penetrance or prevalence of BRCA1 mutations may be lower in Iran.

Genetic predisposition is responsible for 5% 10% of all breast cancer cases. Therefore, the inherited susceptibility to breast cancer has been intensively investigated during the last 10 years. In particular, the identification of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) and BRCA2 and the current genetic testing for mutations in both genes are the basis for estimating disease risks for women with a strong family history of breast cancer and will provide important information on the prevention and treatment of familial breast cancer.