26Due to uniform shrinkage along the radial direction, drying from both top and bottom surfaces has been 27 recommended to replace drying from outer circumference surface in the restrained circular ring test to assess 28 cracking tendency of concrete. However, non-uniform shrinkage along the height direction under drying 29 conditions is significant, and its effect on crack initiation and propagation in a concrete ring is not clearly 30 understood. To investigate the fracture mechanism of the restrained ring test under drying from top and bottom 31 surfaces, three series of circular and elliptical ring specimens with heights of 30 mm, 50 mm and 75 mm are 32 tested to measure the cracking ages. A fracture mechanics based numerical method is proposed by introducing 33 fictitious crack model to simulate the fracture process and predict the cracking age of a concrete ring under 34 restraint. The effects of ring geometric profile, specimen height and moisture gradient on crack development 35 are discussed. The results indicate that, under drying from both top and bottom surfaces, crack initiates partly 36 along the height direction at the inner circumference of a concrete ring, and propagates along the radial 37 direction, one by one, until the crack propagated throughout the whole cross-section. The moisture gradient 38 along the height direction has significant effect on the crack driving force, which is dominated by the moisture 39 gradient and steel ring restraint near the exposed surface, whose proportion increases with the increase in 40 distance from the exposed surface. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 1 Introduction
59Concrete is likely to experience shrinkage in response to cement hydration, temperature reduction and 60 moisture dissipation in the process of maintenance, most notably at early ages. When the shrinkage is 61 restrained, cracks initiate easily in concrete structures due to its low cracking resistance, resulting in low 62 structure durability and significant maintenance costs [1]. Therefore, it is important to choose the appropriate 63 laboratory test methods to assess the cracking tendency of concrete used in the field. So far, several test 64 methods have been developed to assess cracking resistance of cementitious materials in the restrained 65 condition, including restrained uniaxial test [2, 3], restrained slab test [4, 5], restrained beam test [6, 7], and 66 restrained ring test [8-12]. Due to its relatively low cost and capacity of providing uniformity end restraint, the 67 restrained ring test has been widely adopted over the other test methods for assessing cracking potential of 68 concrete mixtures. 69 To standardize the restrained ring test, American Association of State Highway and Transportation 70 Officials (AASHTO) (i.e. AASHTO PP34-99: Standard Practice for Cracking Tendency Using a Ring Specimen)
71recommended a certain version of ring specimen: a 75 mm thick concrete ring restrained by a 12.5 mm thick 72 steel ring and dried from its outer circumferential surface. It was reported that, in ...