Background: To share our experience of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (U-RATS) anatomic pulmonary resection.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of U-RATS and biportal-RATS (B-RATS; 2 ports). From March 2021 to June 2022, 109 patients were enrolled in this study. The perioperative results of U-RATS and B-RATS were compared. Results: Perioperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups, including the length of hospital stay and the rate of post-operative (post-op) complications. The mean duration of surgery of the two groups were 124.1 vs. 103.6 min (P=0.049), mean intraoperative blood loss was 131.7 vs. 143.1 mL, mean post-op hospital stay was 3.83 vs. 3.05 days (P=0.037), and the thoracic drainage of the first day after surgery were 230.9 vs. 207.1 mL. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after the first post-op day were 3.83 vs. 4.57 (P=0.018). No perioperative mortality occurred in either group. Conclusions: Both U-RATS and B-RATS are safe and feasible methods for major pulmonary resections. U-RATS achieved similar perioperative outcomes and lower VAS-scores for the patients, which may improve the post-op experience and the quality of patients' lives. Further follow-up investigations are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of U-RATS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.