Single antigen-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may be insufficient to induce a durable response in pediatric aggressive B-cell lymphomas. The clinical trial (ChiCTR1800014457) examined the feasibility of sequential different B cell antigen-targeted CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric refractory/relapsed Burkitt lymphoma. Twenty-three patients received the first CD19 CAR T-cell infusion. The patients who did not achieve an ongoing complete response sequentially underwent one or more additional infusions of CAR T-cell targeting CD22 followed by CD20 according to their disease status and CAR T-cell persistence after each infusion. The median time from the last infusion to cutoff date was 17 months (range, 15 to 23). The estimated 18-month complete response rate was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 91). The estimated 18-month progression-free survival rate was 78% (95% CI, 55 to 90), with 78% (95% CI, 37 to 94) in patients with bulky diseases and 60% (95% CI, 25 to 83) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. During the first CD19 CAR T-cell infusion, grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity occurred in 34.8% and 21.7% of all patients, respectively. During subsequent infusions, few incidences of higher than grade 2 CRS and neurotoxicity were observed. All adverse events were reversible. The severity of neurotoxicity was not significantly different between patients with CNS and non-CNS involvement. Sequential CAR T-cell therapy may result in a durable response and is safe in pediatric refractory/relapsed Burkitt lymphoma. Patients with CNS involvement may benefit from sequential CAR T-cell therapy. This trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx as ChiCTR1800014457.
Background:Outcomes for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are poor despite use of high-intensity chemotherapy. CAR-T has shown efficacy in treating refractory/relapsed leukemia in pediatric patients and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adult patients. Objectives:To assess the safety and efficacy of sequential CAR-T in the treatment of refractory/ relapsed B-NHL in pediatric patients. Design/Methods:In our ongoing clinical trial (ChiCTR1800014457), we enrolled and treated 17 pediatric patients with refractory/relapsed B-NHL. Following leukapheresis, T cells were activated with CD3 and CD28 antibodies for 24h, then transduced with lentivirus encoding anti-CD19-CD3zeta-4-1BB CAR and cultured for 5-6 days in serum-free media containing IL2, IL7, IL15, IL21. Meanwhile, all patients briefly received lympho-depleting chemotherapies consisting of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/day) on days −5, −4 and −3 according to tumor burden and patient state. On day 0, all patients received a single-dose infusion of CAR-T cells. CAR-T cell dose ranged from 0.5 to 3 million/kg. CAR-T cell numbers and cytokines were measured weekly. Tumor responses were evaluated at day 30 and day 60 post infusion and every two months thereafter. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAEv4 except cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded according to Lee et al. Results:Treated patients had relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma (BL) (13/17), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (2/17), B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-LBL) (2/17), and ranged from 4.5-18.0 years old. By St Jude's staging, 9 cases (46.7%) were in stage III, 8 cases (53.3%) were in stage IV. There were 3 cases with CNS involvement (17.6%) and 7 cases with bone marrow involvement (41.2%). They all failed at prior treatment including an average of 8.9 (6-15) courses of chemotherapy. They were then treated with sequential CAR-T cell therapy. A total of 26 courses of CAR-T cell infusion were administered. The overall complete response rate (CRR) was 41.7% (7/17) when first course of CAR-T therapy was conducted, which were all CD19 targeted. Among the 10 patients who did not achieve CR, 2 patients achieved PR with ongoing response, 1 patient died of severe CRS and progression at day 6 and another patient refused to continue the following therapy when tumor progressed at day 99, and he died 1 week later, the other 6 continued to receive second course of CAR-T therapy targeting CD20 or CD22, and 3 of them achieved CR. Thus the overall CRR increased to 58.8% (10/17). The 3 patients, who still did not achieve CR, continued to receive third course of CAR-T therapy targeting CD20 or CD22. Two of them finally achieved CR and the other failed to get CR and is now retreated with chemotherapy and oral Olaparib and Venclexta. Thus, with a median follow-up of 6.2 months (1-18 months), the overall response rate of sequential CAR-T therapy was 94.1% (16/17) and the overall CRR was 70.6% (12/17). Toxicity information through day 30 revealed the occurrence of mild CRS in 8 subjects (47.1%, grade I n=8, grade II n=0), severe CRS in 9 subjects (52.9%, grade III n=8, grade IV n=1). Neurotoxicity was observed in 7 cases (41.2%, seizure in 3 cases, tremor in 4 cases, headache in 1 cases). One case who died rapidly at day 6 of therapy suffered severe CRS (high fever, Capillary leak syndrome, severe pleural effusion, respiratory failure, shock, cardiopulmonary arrest) and neurotoxicity besides disease progression. Other patients with severe CRS and neurotoxicity recovered fully after glucocorticoid use and symptomatic treatment including anti-epilepsy, fluid, dehydrating agent. No case used tocilizumab. Response assessments were performed at day 15, 30, 45, 60. Updated enrollment, toxicity and response assessments will be presented. Conclusion: CD19/CD20/CD22-CAR-T therapy showed promising efficacy for pediatric patients with r/r B-NHL and the toxicities are tolerable with proper symptomatic and supportive treatment. Sequential CAR-T therapy can improve the efficacy compared with a single course of CAR-T infusion. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.